Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Carl Spackler 12-05-2014 04:22 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1776527)
There have been TEN (10) regular or Special MEC meetings since the August 2013 Meeting (in SEA)where the Virgin JV topic has been addressed with the negotiators and MEC.

483 days to collect feedback and 10 meetings to provide direction.

How many more times do they need to have a meeting to redirect and choose the parameters before making a decision?

"Blind trust" would be 10 days to email your rep and one meeting they vote; done.

"Trust, but verify" would look a lot more like 483 days of taking input, 10 meetings to give direction, ask questions, get more information, narrow the direction, redirect and let your NC do what you hired them to do!

Not in a single one of those 10 meetings did the MEC give direction to the negotiating committee to:

1. Hide from the MEC the data required to determine whether the percentage share of the flying represents a loss, gain, or neutrality from our current baseline.

2. Negotiate the ability of management to be massively out of compliance during every other year of the agreement as long as they're in compliance every other year.

3. Allow for no penalties whatsoever if the company decides they won't be in compliance every other year.

This is the exact same model as C2012. Our negotiators have signed a TA with management that specifically does NOT meet the direction of the MEC and the negotiators are daring the reps to vote it down.

This is now the second time this has happened. C2015 will undoubtedly be the third. When will a majority of us ever fix this? When will a majority of us say BULLSHIZNIT to anyone who calls it "Blind Trust" to give members 10 days to read the TA and give input to their reps before the ratification vote? How twisted must one be to refer to that as "Blind Trust?"

Carl

Cogf16 12-05-2014 05:28 AM


Originally Posted by maddogmax (Post 1774473)
As a A-7 guy the only good think about going 1V1 with the F4 was you could see them coming miles away. Still usually got my butt kicked.

I got 1500 hrs in the "SLUFF" and many hours fighting F-4's. If you could fight them in subsonic airspace, you could stay with them and beat em if they got slow(which they did all the time) We had the maneuvering flaps(AMF) and at light weights and low/med alt, we could turn with them. Fight them out over the ocean(supersonic, 60 nm looks, up to 50K) they could beat you up if flown properly. The Mako's really new how to fly that jet in those conditions. :(

Bucking Bar 12-05-2014 05:36 AM

Intellectual rant of the day ...

Why has human progress ground to a halt? ? Michael Hanlon ? Aeon

Examines why the rapid progress of 1945 to 1971 does not seem to happen today. Or, as Buzz Aldrin said, "you promised missions to Mars, I got Facebook instead."

Bucking Bar 12-05-2014 05:38 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1776527)
There have been TEN (10) regular or Special MEC meetings since the August 2013 Meeting (in SEA)where the Virgin JV topic has been addressed with the negotiators and MEC.

483 days to collect feedback and 10 meetings to provide direction.

How many more times do they need to have a meeting to redirect and choose the parameters before making a decision?

"Blind trust" would be 10 days to email your rep and one meeting they vote; done.

"Trust, but verify" would look a lot more like 483 days of taking input, 10 meetings to give direction, ask questions, get more information, narrow the direction, redirect and let your NC do what you hired them to do!

Well stated.

Sputnik 12-05-2014 05:52 AM

So, if SEA opened as a 737 base, does a new category waive seat locks?

And is a new category one of those things that can get you a paid move?

TeddyKGB 12-05-2014 06:01 AM


Originally Posted by Sputnik (Post 1776617)
So, if SEA opened as a 737 base, does a new category waive seat locks?

And is a new category one of those things that can get you a paid move?

I don't think a seat lock applies to a new category such as SEA 737, however I don't think you would get a free move out of it if you bid it voluntarily.

badflaps 12-05-2014 06:08 AM


Originally Posted by Bucking Bar (Post 1776603)
Intellectual rant of the day ...

Why has human progress ground to a halt? ? Michael Hanlon ? Aeon

Examines why the rapid progress of 1945 to 1971 does not seem to happen today. Or, as Buzz Aldrin said, "you promised missions to Mars, I got Facebook instead."

Hero that he is, I'm not sure Buzz is all tied together.

CheapTrick 12-05-2014 06:30 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1776527)
There have been TEN (10) regular or Special MEC meetings since the August 2013 Meeting (in SEA)where the Virgin JV topic has been addressed with the negotiators and MEC.

483 days to collect feedback and 10 meetings to provide direction.

How many more times do they need to have a meeting to redirect and choose the parameters before making a decision?

"Blind trust" would be 10 days to email your rep and one meeting they vote; done.

"Trust, but verify" would look a lot more like 483 days of taking input, 10 meetings to give direction, ask questions, get more information, narrow the direction, redirect and let your NC do what you hired them to do!


This is the perfect response to those former DPA shills that just choose to hate everything DALPA does, says, doesn't do or doesn't say. It is always the same shrill whine. Everything is "we're doomed". The truth is always something much more benign even if DALPA screws up.

A few here have become white noise by choosing to stand outside the arena and shout at the players. Want change so bad? Get involved. Your histrionics change nothing but are irritating.

DeadHead 12-05-2014 06:31 AM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 1776380)
You and I have always had very civil discourse. I have always appreciated that. We might not agree on some things but it has always been a pleasure.

I see your point but I'm not ready to "throw the baby out with the bath water" so to speak. I think there are a lot of good guys on the MEC. If the MEC Admin is doing something the MEC doesn't like, then the MEC needs to take care of that.

The true problem we, as a union, have...........is apathy. And I'm just as guilty of it as the next person. We need 12000 members giving 12000 opinions to their reps. Unfortunately my guess is that very few people do this on a regular basis.

Anyway, a better union alternative (IMO) has not come forward so we have what we have and need to improve it.

Denny

Nice post Denny!

You've persuaded me to actually email my rep as opposed to complaining about circumstances after the fact.

My concerns are with the vacuity of information provided in this LOA. If it's going to be voted on soon, we have a right as constituents to be informed about all the specifics as to give guidance to our elected representatives.

PilotFrog 12-05-2014 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1776389)
Edward Jones expects their franchisees to tow the party line. If he went off the reservation, even a little, he's done. EJ, IMO, is a hedge fund-ish business. They expect the little people to maneuver the market for them.

Your guy is not supposed to think for himself. If he did, that's a no no.

Turns out that is exactly why he was let go. He never pushed any EJ products and I guess they got fed up with that. I'd just moved a bunch of my stuff over to EJ cause of him. Oh well, I'd been managing on my own the last 20 years, I guess I can keep on doing it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:32 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands