![]() |
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1784022)
Ever since the JV agreement was signed as a six party agreement, they were supposed to end up with a 50/50 split of EASK's.
From 51.5% to our approx 47% today represents an awful lot of actual jobs lost, and jobs we never got. Carl |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1784093)
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1784022)
DAL was operating roughly 54-46% of the EASK's but had planned to growth to be "in the window" to comply.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1784022)
Then the European meltdown happened and the transatlantic flying started to become unprofitable. DAL drew down flying to match capacity with demand.... AF and KL did not.
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1784022)
AF was viewed as a jobs creator for the French economy and the govt didn't want them to shrink and layoff more workers into the economy. UNSAT, IMHO... Business is business. Similar story with KL, but they did drawdown a little bit more than AF, but still not enough to match the DAL drawdown. RA doesn't want to lose money unless it's a strategic long term play.... Keeping up those North Atlantic numbers didn't fit any strategic plan.
Oh wait... Carl |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1784119)
George, what you have just posted matches up almost exactly with what I posted a few days ago that you said was all wrong. I stated we were above 47%. The above confirms it and does not account for the AF strike which adds about a half percent.
Take a look at the entire 36-month look-back period. You'll see that the initial 36 months from April 2011 to March 2014 contain considerable portions above the lower compliance band. When we measure the 36-months look-back at the end of March 2015, the start point will shift right to April 2012, and even the highest point of the 36-month rolling average will then fall below the 48.5% lower band... https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...ng-average.png I'm sure you understand this... Cheers George |
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1781097)
How many 757s are there now? When will the fleet stabilize? Where do the NBA charter planes that I've heard so much about fit in?
|
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 1784145)
I just heard from a reliable company pilot that the 757 fleet will be 100 +/- a few. Kinda looking for some "newer" used ones as well to replace some of our oldest ones. Keeping ER's longer as well.
You are correct. I don't know what the confusion on this issue is. On September 30 S.D. and his team rolled into LAX for the FLT OPS roadshow. This exact question was asked and the answer was 90 DAL owned 757s and 10 leased back from the NBA. Now everything is obviously subject to change but I have heard about 15 different numbers since then, but if you cant trust the FLT OPs team with the Network guy and the Fleet guy both saying 90 + 10, then all other numbers are also meaningless. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 1784145)
I just heard from a reliable company pilot that the 757 fleet will be 100 +/- a few. Kinda looking for some "newer" used ones as well to replace some of our oldest ones. Keeping ER's longer as well.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 1784168)
How many do we have right now? Anyone know that answer?
|
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1784022)
So now DAL EASK's fall as a survival measure, not as a "screw those Delta Pilots" move.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1784184)
Unbelievable. A survival measure? We were and are making billions. Keeping those flights (and their word in the contract they signed with us) would have made those flights unprofitable most likely, but would have had no bearing on the survival of Delta. It might not have been "screw those Delta pilots", but it definitely was: "I'm not about to let that contract diminish our profit and my bonus." And with DALPA It was: If Richard's happy...we're happy."
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands