Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 04-16-2015 | 06:48 PM
  #180951  
Wilbur Wright's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wilbur Wright
While the A330/350 are the same type rating, the question will be if the FAA requires maintaining recency in both types. If so, then you're correct, the company will not make them the same category.
A330



A350


Last edited by Wilbur Wright; 04-16-2015 at 07:29 PM.
Old 04-16-2015 | 08:00 PM
  #180952  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by profit
Great article. Thanks.
Old 04-16-2015 | 08:10 PM
  #180953  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 276
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
When you were "experiencing" this before, was your company retiring half the seniority list in the amount of time that we will be? I'm just curious. Mandatory retirements are the one thing we can count on. Pilots WILL leave at age 65, and they WILL be leaving in droves. And they tend to be at the top of the list too btw.

You guys that are beating this drum need to empirically prove that it is the crisis you are alleging. Short of that it is just more emotional drivel.

And fwiw, I haven't made up my mind yet on this issue. I want proof though one way or the other.
Simple math can show the loss of potential income.

Beating the drum of planned retirements is dumb, sorry. Age 65 probably won't stay. I'd like to see it go back to age 60, but thatS an entirely different conversation.

With no reason for people to bid, or progress their career, stagnation occurs. Simple. Loss of QOL. If you want pay banding, go work for an airline with one fleet type. A benefit of DAL is options. Lots. For QOL of a base, of different categories. Throw pay banding in... Those options shrink as there is less motivation for others to bid around the system.

It greatly reduces staffing. Do I need to explain that?

If, and if this was 9/15/2001 or during BK.... And it solved some huge problem to keep us afloat, talk to me then. I'm all for saving the company bacon... But this is not the right time nor place for pay banding.

I've told my reps... So be it. 15yrs of BS ALPA. I'm hoping for a better experience at DALPA. If not, I'll sign a card... I haven't yet, because I want to see this section 6 first.
Old 04-17-2015 | 02:16 AM
  #180954  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
Default pay banding

What kind of restriction Is the company looking for with banding? Because that will be the most important factor. Can you change in your band, only go up in bands etc.that determines how bad it is. Can anyone shed light on what the co wants in terms of band restrictions. Also what would the bands be.
Thanks
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:17 AM
  #180955  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by ilinipilot
What kind of restriction Is the company looking for with banding? Because that will be the most important factor. Can you change in your band, only go up in bands etc.that determines how bad it is. Can anyone shed light on what the co wants in terms of band restrictions. Also what would the bands be.
Thanks
Since section 3 is the last part of the contract discussed, this is all just mental whackin off. When someone throws a grenade in a room, we all debate the heck out of it and watch it blow up.

That said, pay banding as we are discussing it just equals the pay rate across similarly size aircraft. In this way training is reduced since there is no reason to chase pay rate within the band.

No one can shed light on what the company want except the guys that have signed NDAs.
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:20 AM
  #180956  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Big E 757
By state of the business, he means that with all of the retirements coming up we shouldn't worry about things that slow progression or reduce head count.

I disagree, we have stagnated for so long, now that things are finally moving in the right direction, I don't want anything to slow movement down one bit. I'm also concerned about age 67 rearing it's ugly head when retirements really kick in a few years from now. But that's just me.
It's actually age 68 In Japan. you can still pilot an airliner when you're 67 but must retire at 68, so it was a 3 year extension.

So age 68 in the way we say things.
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:23 AM
  #180957  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
It's actually age 68 In Japan, you can still pilot an airliner when you're 67 but must retire at 68.

So age 65 + 3 years not 2.
I think the company should hand out samurai swords when guys reach sixty. You know, as an act of goodwill.
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:24 AM
  #180958  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 2
From: Capt
Default

AE QUESTION:

I was awarded a different base on an AE and am happy with my seniority in that base. (say 50% in category) If I suspect in the next few AE's that I will be bumped back quite a bit, does a request in the first request of new base 50%, then 2nd request of old base do anything for me?

Current Award : ATL 73N 50%
next ae request: ATL73N 50%, NYC 73N

Meaning if I can't stay at 50% in base, I want to go back to my old base, where I was senior if there is an opening.

or do I have to risk it and just bid back to old base?

Thanks
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:24 AM
  #180959  
Elliot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,685
Likes: 0
From: "Prof" button manipulator
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
It's actually age 68 In Japan, you can still pilot an airliner when you're 67 but must retire at 68.

So age 65 + 3 years not 2.
I see your age 68 rule and raise you one! I vote for age sixty-nine! Flyin' til you be dyin' has a nice ring to it on a bag tag. Sixty will be the new 40! http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/technol...living-5525916
Old 04-17-2015 | 04:32 AM
  #180960  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by boog123
AE QUESTION:

I was awarded a different base on an AE and am happy with my seniority in that base. (say 50% in category) If I suspect in the next few AE's that I will be bumped back quite a bit, does a request in the first request of new base 50%, then 2nd request of old base do anything for me?

Current Award : ATL 73N 50%
next ae request: ATL73N 50%, NYC 73N

Meaning if I can't stay at 50% in base, I want to go back to my old base, where I was senior if there is an opening.

or do I have to risk it and just bid back to old base?

Thanks
If you have an AE request in, you are asking for the move. My guess, because I didn't get it clearly in the explanation, is that you are 50% in ATL 73n if you can't stay at 50% or higher! you want to go be senior in JFK again.

If you're in category, an AE preference for your current category is a waste. A voluntary displacement might be more what you want or a simple AE back to your old base.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices