![]() |
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 2002185)
757-300, 220+ people on board, pull into gate and shut down the APU ASAP even if they don't have air on board the jet yet. Oh yeah! Great idea! Awesome! Save gas! Screw passengers, they didn't pay for comfort. Well, maybe we care about comfort, 'like how's the ride?' 20x in flight and dammit you better get up and tell them goodbye in case they fill out a survey, but as far as AC, let em burn.
Not just 757. Had crews doing that out west on the 717 and this week on an 88 when I was deadheading. I don't get it. Why? Why why why why, WHY? Standby for rant about people seeing no problem with being 2000 agl 17 miles from an airport at 250 knots. If you are the CA then I would ask why you are ignoring the company guidelines. If your the FO I would politely point out that the company places passenger comfort behind only safety in the list of priorities. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2002250)
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
|
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2002239)
You and I have went down this road before and you are wrong.
It is not a contract issue. 117 did away with the 30 block hour limit in 7 days and replaced it with a 30 hour rest in 168 hour rolling period. After our last go around I don't think you really worked for an airline pre 117 because anyone who did knows 117 made it WAY easier for companies to schedule us for consecutive days in a row. It has NOTHING to do with the required break in duty, but the 30 hour block limit in 7 days disappearing. You were arguing that pre-117 was better because you were guaranteed a day off in base. That was never the case. It only guaranteed 24 hours free from duty. 117 requires more, 30 hours of rest, so I don't see your gripe with that issue. I'll ask you again, didn't 12 day trips exist pre-117? While 117 did eliminate the 30 hours of block hours in 7 days, it gave us 60 hours of flight duty limit in 7 days. The old rules could have allowed 80+ hours of flight duty in 7 days. I also worked 121 pre-117 and I have had a lot more time at home and more rest during trips than pre-117.
Originally Posted by hammer189
(Post 2002176)
I remember the old 24 hrs off had to be in BASE but now it's 30 hrs off anywhere, even on a layover. This was not an improvement.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2002250)
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2002256)
Exactly. The fact that 404yxl jumps in every time we bring this up and tells us we are crazy and 117 is way better tells me he never worked under the old rules and ran into the 30 in 7 violation. Every regional pilot in the world had that at least a couple times a month pre 117.
|
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2002257)
You're talking about two different things here. 30 hours in 7 replaced 24 hours in 7. 30 hours of block in 7 days was replaced with a 60 hours of flight duty in 7 days.
You were arguing that pre-117 was better because you were guaranteed a day off in base. That was never the case. It only guaranteed 24 hours free from duty. 117 requires more, 30 hours of rest, so I don't see your gripe with that issue. I'll ask you again, didn't 12 day trips exist pre-117? While 117 did eliminate the 30 hours of block hours in 7 days, it gave us 60 hours of flight duty limit in 7 days. The old rules could have allowed 80+ hours of flight duty in 7 days. I also worked 121 pre-117 and I have had a lot more time at home and more rest during trips than pre-117. We have never been guaranteed rest at home, but the block hour rule didn't allow them to schedule you for more than 4.3 hours of average block per day before you had to have a day off which ended up being at home because they couldn't schedule you for more than that. We all used the trick of backing trips up as close as we could and getting 29:30 block within 7 days. Then you tried to get 30 minutes over block sometime in the first 6 days and you got an extra day off when they had to drop a day because you were over 30 hours block. The 30 in 7 block hour limit was the biggest scheduling issue airlines ran into domestically pre 117. The fact that it is gone tells you who had the most lobbying dollars during 117......ALPA......wait I meant the Airlines. ;) |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 2002250)
That's not correct. It was 24 hours off. Did not matter where. The big difference from a domestic standpoint was you could not exceed 30 block hours in 7 days. That tended to spread domestic hours around more.
Currently, as long as you know ahead of time (THAT IS THE KEY), the company can use you around the system for as long as they like until you hit your times. 117 allows you to be away from home for longer period of times as compared to the old rules. TEN ^^Duty period means the period of elapsed time between reporting for an assignment involving flight time and release from that assignment by the certificate holder conducting domestic, flag, or supplemental operations. The time is calculated using either Coordinated Universal Time or local time to reflect the total elapsed time. Rest period means the period free of all restraint or duty for a certificate holder conducting domestic, flag, or supplemental operations and free of all responsibility for work or duty should the occasion arise. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2002261)
I don't care what replaced what, the fact is that pre 117 the 30 in 7 block hour limit basically guaranteed you a day at home every 7 days. Removing that now allows companies to back up trips keeping you on the road domestically for as long as they can find you a 30 hour layover.
We have never been guaranteed rest at home, but the block hour rule didn't allow them to schedule you for more than 4.3 hours of average block per day before you had to have a day off which ended up being at home because they couldn't schedule you for more than that. We all used the trick of backing trips up as close as we could and getting 29:30 block within 7 days. Then you tried to get 30 minutes over block sometime in the first 6 days and you got an extra day off when they had to drop a day because you were over 30 hours block. I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual 24 hour layover. During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days. While we're on this subject, the old rules allowed your 8 scheduled block hour day to turn into 12+ hours. 117 limits it to 9 hard hours. No good-to-start, good-to-finish. |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2002263)
The companies could back trips up under the old rules too. To add to that, you could have gotten 80+ hours of flight duty every 7 days, while the new rules limits that to 60 hours.
I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual 24 hour layover. During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days. |
Originally Posted by RockyBoy
(Post 2002267)
Who did you work for pre 117?
Don't you think it is a good thing that we don't see a 8 hour block day turn into 12 hours and that it is limited to a hard 9 hours now? That our 24 hours of rest in 7, turned into 30 hours? |
Originally Posted by 404yxl
(Post 2002263)
The companies could back trips up under the old rules too. To add to that, you could have gotten 80+ hours of flight duty every 7 days, while the new rules limits that to 60 hours.
I don't know why you think it was impossible to work over 6 days in a row under the old rules. Imagine you are a reserve pilot and you get a lot of DH flying and/or short flying days with 2-3 hours. Very easy to work every single day of a 13 day stretch and only receive 1 actual 24 hour layover . During that 13 day stretch you could have seen 160+ hours of flight duty. 117 would limit that to 120 hours and 190 hours in the last 28 days. The old rules could have allowed 360+ hours of flight duty in 28 days.While we're on this subject, the old rules allowed your 8 scheduled block hour day to turn into 12+ hours. 117 limits it to 9 hard hours. No good-to-start, good-to-finish. TEN |
Originally Posted by TenYearsGone
(Post 2002270)
Unless I am wrong, Layover counted as being under the company's watch thus not satisfying the 24 hours off of duty in 7.
TEN |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:33 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands