Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 10-17-2019 | 08:04 PM
  #198541  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 169
Default

Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
from the base meeting...AE will be coming out more than likely in November....

Hiring 1350 next year...expect 3% growth every year for awhile, expect to be a net gain of 400 pilots a year, this includes growth, retirement, and attrition


2 New 350's coming in Q1 and Q2....LATAM jets are still up in air (need seat configure and cabin overhaul, will take approximately 2 years for cabin mod (marketing may put jets in as is Q4 of 2020 or Q1 of 2021

Opening 717 Base in MSP (30 crews) but removing 30-40 crews/FOs off 7ER on this next AE

Still looking at BOS as 320/7ER base with the growth there, surprisingly also looking at AUS as 320 base. MCO in mix as well...
757's to be redeployed into more shorthaul markets from ATL due to lower NPS scores than the 321 and believe it or not, quicker turnaround time from the 321 by about 5-10 minutes. 757 will be mainly going to a domestic market in the next 1-2 years. A321 NEOs will be doing transcons to start and Hawaii eventually

88's going away end of 2020, keeping around 15 MD90's for unknown time...

717's will stay at least till 2024 with potential till 2031 (life cycle ends in 2031)

7ER replacement still looking at NMA with Boeing but need to make decision soon

Airbus is having a quality control problem with jets out of Hamburg, which is pushing back some of our 321 deliveries 8-9-10 months

330-900NEO having some issues as well with certification of certain systems...

most new 350's will be deployed to DTW

No issues with A220 engines as ours are have lower thrust rating than Swiss and Baltic, buuuuuut, still having some growing pains with some of the quality coming out of Mirabel...
Good info thx. Any word on new A220 bases?
Old 10-17-2019 | 08:05 PM
  #198542  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 458
Likes: 1
From: 320B
Default

Good scoop! Any west coast information on bases/planes?


Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
from the base meeting...AE will be coming out more than likely in November....

Hiring 1350 next year...expect 3% growth every year for awhile, expect to be a net gain of 400 pilots a year, this includes growth, retirement, and attrition


2 New 350's coming in Q1 and Q2....LATAM jets are still up in air (need seat configure and cabin overhaul, will take approximately 2 years for cabin mod (marketing may put jets in as is Q4 of 2020 or Q1 of 2021

Opening 717 Base in MSP (30 crews) but removing 30-40 crews/FOs off 7ER on this next AE

Still looking at BOS as 320/7ER base with the growth there, surprisingly also looking at AUS as 320 base. MCO in mix as well...
757's to be redeployed into more shorthaul markets from ATL due to lower NPS scores than the 321 and believe it or not, quicker turnaround time from the 321 by about 5-10 minutes. 757 will be mainly going to a domestic market in the next 1-2 years. A321 NEOs will be doing transcons to start and Hawaii eventually

88's going away end of 2020, keeping around 15 MD90's for unknown time...

717's will stay at least till 2024 with potential till 2031 (life cycle ends in 2031)

7ER replacement still looking at NMA with Boeing but need to make decision soon

Airbus is having a quality control problem with jets out of Hamburg, which is pushing back some of our 321 deliveries 8-9-10 months

330-900NEO having some issues as well with certification of certain systems...

most new 350's will be deployed to DTW

No issues with A220 engines as ours are have lower thrust rating than Swiss and Baltic, buuuuuut, still having some growing pains with some of the quality coming out of Mirabel...
Old 10-18-2019 | 04:05 AM
  #198543  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by 20fathoms
good info thx. Any word on new a220 bases?
sea q1/q2 2020
Old 10-18-2019 | 05:07 AM
  #198544  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,308
Likes: 51
Default

If they are adding 30 717 crews to MSP, where are they displacing from?
Old 10-18-2019 | 05:40 AM
  #198545  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Two years for a cabin mod??? It doesn’t take that long to build a 350.


Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
from the base meeting...AE will be coming out more than likely in November....

Hiring 1350 next year...expect 3% growth every year for awhile, expect to be a net gain of 400 pilots a year, this includes growth, retirement, and attrition


2 New 350's coming in Q1 and Q2....LATAM jets are still up in air (need seat configure and cabin overhaul, will take approximately 2 years for cabin mod (marketing may put jets in as is Q4 of 2020 or Q1 of 2021

Opening 717 Base in MSP (30 crews) but removing 30-40 crews/FOs off 7ER on this next AE

Still looking at BOS as 320/7ER base with the growth there, surprisingly also looking at AUS as 320 base. MCO in mix as well...
757's to be redeployed into more shorthaul markets from ATL due to lower NPS scores than the 321 and believe it or not, quicker turnaround time from the 321 by about 5-10 minutes. 757 will be mainly going to a domestic market in the next 1-2 years. A321 NEOs will be doing transcons to start and Hawaii eventually

88's going away end of 2020, keeping around 15 MD90's for unknown time...

717's will stay at least till 2024 with potential till 2031 (life cycle ends in 2031)

7ER replacement still looking at NMA with Boeing but need to make decision soon

Airbus is having a quality control problem with jets out of Hamburg, which is pushing back some of our 321 deliveries 8-9-10 months

330-900NEO having some issues as well with certification of certain systems...

most new 350's will be deployed to DTW

No issues with A220 engines as ours are have lower thrust rating than Swiss and Baltic, buuuuuut, still having some growing pains with some of the quality coming out of Mirabel...
Old 10-18-2019 | 06:08 AM
  #198546  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 384
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by waldo135
If they are adding 30 717 crews to MSP, where are they displacing from?
ATL but adding more ER
Old 10-18-2019 | 08:47 AM
  #198547  
GogglesPisano's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
20M Airline Miles
10 Years
Gets Weekends Off
50 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 6,561
Likes: 311
From: Sitting SC at the Five Towns
Default

Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
from the base meeting...AE will be coming out more than likely in November....

Hiring 1350 next year...expect 3% growth every year for awhile, expect to be a net gain of 400 pilots a year, this includes growth, retirement, and attrition


2 New 350's coming in Q1 and Q2....LATAM jets are still up in air (need seat configure and cabin overhaul, will take approximately 2 years for cabin mod (marketing may put jets in as is Q4 of 2020 or Q1 of 2021

Opening 717 Base in MSP (30 crews) but removing 30-40 crews/FOs off 7ER on this next AE

Still looking at BOS as 320/7ER base with the growth there, surprisingly also looking at AUS as 320 base. MCO in mix as well...
757's to be redeployed into more shorthaul markets from ATL due to lower NPS scores than the 321 and believe it or not, quicker turnaround time from the 321 by about 5-10 minutes. 757 will be mainly going to a domestic market in the next 1-2 years. A321 NEOs will be doing transcons to start and Hawaii eventually

88's going away end of 2020, keeping around 15 MD90's for unknown time...

717's will stay at least till 2024 with potential till 2031 (life cycle ends in 2031)

7ER replacement still looking at NMA with Boeing but need to make decision soon

Airbus is having a quality control problem with jets out of Hamburg, which is pushing back some of our 321 deliveries 8-9-10 months

330-900NEO having some issues as well with certification of certain systems...

most new 350's will be deployed to DTW

No issues with A220 engines as ours are have lower thrust rating than Swiss and Baltic, buuuuuut, still having some growing pains with some of the quality coming out of Mirabel...
Always appreciate the synopsis. Thanks.

I doubt very much we will open a new pilot base (AUS) for one aircraft type. Especially if it's a non-hub.

Unless they mean a base for aicraft.
Old 10-18-2019 | 09:11 AM
  #198548  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 131
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by NeverFlexTO
from the base meeting...AE will be coming out more than likely in November....

Hiring 1350 next year...expect 3% growth every year for awhile, expect to be a net gain of 400 pilots a year, this includes growth, retirement, and attrition


2 New 350's coming in Q1 and Q2....LATAM jets are still up in air (need seat configure and cabin overhaul, will take approximately 2 years for cabin mod (marketing may put jets in as is Q4 of 2020 or Q1 of 2021

Opening 717 Base in MSP (30 crews) but removing 30-40 crews/FOs off 7ER on this next AE

Still looking at BOS as 320/7ER base with the growth there, surprisingly also looking at AUS as 320 base. MCO in mix as well...
757's to be redeployed into more shorthaul markets from ATL due to lower NPS scores than the 321 and believe it or not, quicker turnaround time from the 321 by about 5-10 minutes. 757 will be mainly going to a domestic market in the next 1-2 years. A321 NEOs will be doing transcons to start and Hawaii eventually

88's going away end of 2020, keeping around 15 MD90's for unknown time...

717's will stay at least till 2024 with potential till 2031 (life cycle ends in 2031)

7ER replacement still looking at NMA with Boeing but need to make decision soon

Airbus is having a quality control problem with jets out of Hamburg, which is pushing back some of our 321 deliveries 8-9-10 months

330-900NEO having some issues as well with certification of certain systems...

most new 350's will be deployed to DTW

No issues with A220 engines as ours are have lower thrust rating than Swiss and Baltic, buuuuuut, still having some growing pains with some of the quality coming out of Mirabel...
Interesting how you could get on here and relay the info like that. The “possible new bases” 🤦*♂️ was nothing more than a response to a pilot asking “if we were to add new bases, what would they be?” The usual names were thrown out, Boston, Austin, etc. Which was followed by Bob stating all the reasons we won’t be adding any......

The hiring # was 850 - 1,350. 1,350 sounded unlikely as it was the number if they decided to “full kit” some of the pairings (pilots stay with the flight attendants throughout the day).

Interesting how two people can attend the same meeting and come away with very different impressions.

Ps. PB was explaining the different optimizers and admitted that in a perfect world they’d like to run the schedule just as the pre-month optimizer suggests (lowest pre month credit). The only reason they are backing it off now is they have realized they should really be trying to reduce “end of month” credit. This requires more buffers in the original schedule. Not because they really care about our QOL. It’s 100% about the numbers to them, as most of us know.
Old 10-18-2019 | 09:50 AM
  #198549  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 16
From: Hoping for any position
Default

Originally Posted by max gross
Interesting how you could get on here and relay the info like that. The “possible new bases” 🤦*♂️ was nothing more than a response to a pilot asking “if we were to add new bases, what would they be?” The usual names were thrown out, Boston, Austin, etc. Which was followed by Bob stating all the reasons we won’t be adding any......

The hiring # was 850 - 1,350. 1,350 sounded unlikely as it was the number if they decided to “full kit” some of the pairings (pilots stay with the flight attendants throughout the day).

Interesting how two people can attend the same meeting and come away with very different impressions.

Ps. PB was explaining the different optimizers and admitted that in a perfect world they’d like to run the schedule just as the pre-month optimizer suggests (lowest pre month credit). The only reason they are backing it off now is they have realized they should really be trying to reduce “end of month” credit. This requires more buffers in the original schedule. Not because they really care about our QOL. It’s 100% about the numbers to them, as most of us know.
What?!?!? Rumors or stories are wrong AND the company doesn’t care about my QOL over profits? I can’t handle all this in one post.
Old 10-18-2019 | 10:34 AM
  #198550  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 382
Likes: 2
From: 737B
Default

So, you mean the end-of-month optimizer (reality) should take priority over the pre-month optimizer (unicorn/fantasy land)..... blasphemy... Organize the witch hunt!!!!
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices