Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
08-05-2020, 03:05 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
So did anyone else see the town hall when JL said they are looking into using Force mejure to get out of scope restrictions and furlough pay?
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
08-05-2020, 03:13 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,724
Welcome to 2006 part deux.
08-05-2020, 03:47 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 443
Originally Posted by gloopy
What scope would be subject to that clause anyway? FM doesn't mean a self imposed unlimited internal Ch.11/1113c process whereby they rewrite the entire CBA as they wish. FM is specific so what applies to scope? Even the furlough pay would most likely be a slam dunk win for us, although its certainlly possible they might roll the dice just to "go for it" as it costs nothing to try.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
08-05-2020, 04:11 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Originally Posted by gloopy
What scope would be subject to that clause anyway? FM doesn't mean a self imposed unlimited internal Ch.11/1113c process whereby they rewrite the entire CBA as they wish. FM is specific so what applies to scope? Even the furlough pay would most likely be a slam dunk win for us, although its certainlly possible they might roll the dice just to "go for it" as it costs nothing to try.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
If there isn't a very specific section of scope that's even subject to FM language, then who would even ask that question and why? Unless it was internally planted for FUD.
08-05-2020, 04:26 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
I'm guessing the RJ seat restriction if they furlough past Dec. 2006.
08-05-2020, 04:33 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Originally Posted by OOfff
I’m guessing he was responding to the furlough pay part of the question
08-05-2020, 05:01 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,459
Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
So did anyone else see the town hall when JL said they are looking into using Force mejure to get out of scope restrictions and furlough pay?
Can't believe he actually said it and can't believe no one has mentioned it.
Can't believe he actually said it and can't believe no one has mentioned it.
08-05-2020, 05:25 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,890
I’ll post this here again. It’s an excerpt from the PWA that outlines what force majeur does NOT apply to.
Furlough pay
Furlough pay
08-05-2020, 05:35 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,126
The FM comments were from a ‘preciously submitted question’. I would be shocked (and disappointed) if they had not worked for hours on crafting the answers to those (and this) question.
08-05-2020, 06:21 PM
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 443
Originally Posted by waldo135
The FM comments were from a ‘preciously submitted question’. I would be shocked (and disappointed) if they had not worked for hours on crafting the answers to those (and this) question.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
