![]() |
Originally Posted by MDescent
(Post 3353281)
Sorry for the left field question. If I purchase bottles of liquor at Duty Free on my first leg to a foreign destination, will I have a problem at known crew member with those bottles in my suitcase after my domestic layover?
|
Originally Posted by MDescent
(Post 3353281)
Sorry for the left field question. If I purchase bottles of liquor at Duty Free on my first leg to a foreign destination, will I have a problem at known crew member with those bottles in my suitcase after my domestic layover?
|
Originally Posted by Omar 111
(Post 3353308)
Only if you get randomed! Limited to 100ml per regs.https://www.tsa.gov/travel/security-...tcanibring/all
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3353317)
but still exempt in uniform
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3353346)
wait, so if you get randomed and you're not in uniform, you are hosed on the 3 ounces or > liquids? Serious question, didn't know the answer
from the KCM website: Crewmembers not in uniform:
|
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3353346)
wait, so if you get randomed and you're not in uniform, you are hosed on the 3 ounces or > liquids? Serious question, didn't know the answer
If you go to KCM and get random'd and have to go through TSA Pre-check with the normal travelers, you are subject to the 3-1-1 liquid rule unless you are in uniform. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3353284)
no issue. It’s not prohibited
|
Originally Posted by MDescent
(Post 3353281)
Sorry for the left field question. If I purchase bottles of liquor at Duty Free on my first leg to a foreign destination, will I have a problem at known crew member with those bottles in my suitcase after my domestic layover?
Their rules allow 5L of alcohol below 140 proof in sealed retail packaging. |
Another one to file under "we didn't think they would do that." Batch size limitations have made the greenslip coverage process clunky enough that in some cases scheduling has been skipping the process if the senior pilot eligible declines the trip and rerouting pilots instead. That way it "appears" they have followed the coverage ladder when in fact, they have not. ALWAYS file an Ace report if you're rerouted. That is all.
|
Originally Posted by 172skychicken
(Post 3353784)
Another one to file under "we didn't think they would do that." Batch size limitations have made the greenslip coverage process clunky enough that in some cases scheduling has been skipping the process if the senior pilot eligible declines the trip and rerouting pilots instead. That way it "appears" they have followed the coverage ladder when in fact, they have not. ALWAYS file an Ace report if you're rerouted. That is all.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands