Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Ferd,
Me too. If this deal was so bad, I think we would have been much (much) more vocal in opposing it. One letter by Moak, and one letter by congressional members asking for reasonable terms does not a spirited opposition make. I don't care what AMR says about our lobbying: it doesn't look like an effort to kill a deal. Just to make a deal bearable. 5th Freedom rights go away, and we're not in the streets with pitchforks?
And now... we applaud the results. That could tell you we're trying to put a brave face on things and trying not to look even more desperate for a JAL deal. Or maybe not.
Here is another thing I find interesting. Our stock on Friday during the day went up about 50% more than AMR. Our stock Friday after hours went up over 100% more than AMR's. I wonder why.
I don't know the answers to all the questions, but I'm going to sit tight and see what happens. Besides, I've said it before: this maybe a case of "winners lose". As an investor, I want JAL. As a pilot, I'm not sure. Not everything that's bad in the medium-term for Delta is bad for me in the short-term, or long-term. Maybe it's better if we scramble for a competitive response.
Me too. If this deal was so bad, I think we would have been much (much) more vocal in opposing it. One letter by Moak, and one letter by congressional members asking for reasonable terms does not a spirited opposition make. I don't care what AMR says about our lobbying: it doesn't look like an effort to kill a deal. Just to make a deal bearable. 5th Freedom rights go away, and we're not in the streets with pitchforks?
And now... we applaud the results. That could tell you we're trying to put a brave face on things and trying not to look even more desperate for a JAL deal. Or maybe not.
Here is another thing I find interesting. Our stock on Friday during the day went up about 50% more than AMR. Our stock Friday after hours went up over 100% more than AMR's. I wonder why.
I don't know the answers to all the questions, but I'm going to sit tight and see what happens. Besides, I've said it before: this maybe a case of "winners lose". As an investor, I want JAL. As a pilot, I'm not sure. Not everything that's bad in the medium-term for Delta is bad for me in the short-term, or long-term. Maybe it's better if we scramble for a competitive response.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Having used both extensively:
They both are virtually the same. The WDR is obviously a totally different deal over here, so it's obviously going to be different on ACARS. Never quite understood the 88/ prefix before runway change... but it quickly becomes part of your language, like anything with this job and it's many acronyms. I still try to type "9L-M2" the old NW way sometimes instead of "9LTWYM2" the way we do it... error! error!
I vastly prefer the DL WDR system over the NW, though. The detail and choices in flex temps as opposed to "this or full power" is so much more logical.
I would imagine we'll get TP requests integrated into the DL ACARS before too long. That's not in ours...because well, we didnt have it.
The one thing I truly miss is the connecting gate option on the NWA ACARS. That was so nice to be able to put in a flight number and find the gate and ETD.
They both are virtually the same. The WDR is obviously a totally different deal over here, so it's obviously going to be different on ACARS. Never quite understood the 88/ prefix before runway change... but it quickly becomes part of your language, like anything with this job and it's many acronyms. I still try to type "9L-M2" the old NW way sometimes instead of "9LTWYM2" the way we do it... error! error!
I vastly prefer the DL WDR system over the NW, though. The detail and choices in flex temps as opposed to "this or full power" is so much more logical.
I would imagine we'll get TP requests integrated into the DL ACARS before too long. That's not in ours...because well, we didnt have it.
The one thing I truly miss is the connecting gate option on the NWA ACARS. That was so nice to be able to put in a flight number and find the gate and ETD.
Not sure we still have an operable gate conex feature anymore.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Ferd's right, hope we got something for the open skies...don't think its going to work well...the 78 was selected for the overflights, anticapating this probable outcome in the Asian market.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
Let's just say that I think the merger is still a plus, but that I think the fNW guys should breathe a sigh of relief if NRT takes it on the chin, considering the B742 is already toast, and the DC-9's are looking a little tanned.
Again, the merger will probably be a win-win, and I have no problem with it. Now that the SLI is settled, a lot of the fables heard at the hearing are being exposed, and fortunately the bed-time stuff isn't turning into a "Nightmare in the North".
I think there will still be some 757s out there (hope hope). We may get Guanghzou back and that will require the longer legs. Too bad SGN goes away in March as that required an Atlantic 757 (winglets and fewer seats) to make. Oh well, if they pull the 757s out of NRT then I may actually be forced to go upgrade somewhere........NewK, see ya in SYR for BBQ

BBQ in SYR - are you talking the Dinosaur BBQ? I haven't been there since I was flying turboprops. Great food there!
Regardless, I've never quite understood how the Tokyo hub was going to be the future for U.S.-Asia travel, with the advent of small aircraft that can fly thinner routes, direct. I don't think passengers easily tolerate three-leg trips anymore. A business trip from a small city in the U.S. to a large Asian city would probably entail a US carrier, into a mega hub, to a 787 or 777, direct to destination.
This is because nobody outside of NWA and a few airliners.net types understood that NRT is more than just a connection point for people going to/from Asia.
With 5th Freedom, NWA was able to solicit and carry Japanese O&D traffic, not just to the US, but to all points in Asia, just as if it was a native Japanese Flag carrier.
This is HUGE. This is something that no other airline (other than UAL, to a limited extent) could do. Did a majority of the traffic go US-Asia at some point? Sure, BUT, what it allowed NWA (and DAL) to do is to "top off" those flights with local traffic. Sure, a lot of it was comparatively low yeild, but it WAS yeild for a seat that would have otherwise gone out empty. Pure profit, in other words. Everybody is so darm US centric, they don't see the big picture.
Now as far as the 5th freedom rights mentioned here:
*Removal of restrictions of 5th freedom rights beyond each country (but approval from 3rd country remains required)
That sounds like a relaxation in 5th freedom restrictions, NOT tightening them. And it states that approval from 3rd country is STILL required...if 5th freedoms are eliminated why state this? This makes it sound like 5th freedoms are still in place.
THAT could be why DAL isn't causing as much of a fuss as they might have...I mean, look at the NMB voting rules dust up, or heck, even the LGA deal ("write your congresscritter! your job is COUNTING on it! Here's a link! Do it NOW!"). When this issue came up in the 90's, NWA brought every trick and legislative effort they could muster, even to the point where non-NWA types noticed what was happening...we're talking full page ads in the Washington Post, every day, for months at a time.
40 slots a day, for the whole world at Haneda will dent NRT traffic, but I'm not guessing quite as much as the pundits might say.
Plus there is the whole slot issue. So what if it's open skies? If you don't have landing slots, it doesn't matter. Just like Heathrow. We can't even fill a DC-9 from ATL to Birmingham, and you're telling me you're going to fill a 787 from Nowheresan, Japan to East Butthole, Minnesota? Ain't going to happen. Traffic flows the way it flows for a reason.
Do we need a partner in Asia? It might help, but I'm not seeing this as the epic fail some are seeing.
Nu
Last edited by NuGuy; 12-12-2009 at 03:26 PM.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
The statement in the latest FOM is the same one we have always had for the south concerning commutes. It is not however a flight ops policy. It is a contractual right that is written in the contract.
The commuter policy at NWA while better then Delta's was a flight ops policy and could be revoked on any whim of management. The fact it was not contractual and not in the NWA contract is one reason we were not able to bring it over with the merger.
The commuter policy at NWA while better then Delta's was a flight ops policy and could be revoked on any whim of management. The fact it was not contractual and not in the NWA contract is one reason we were not able to bring it over with the merger.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
One unknown is that I saw an article stating that the Japanese eventually want to have international ops out of HND during the daytime, i.e. after the agreement is passed they will (magically) open it up.
And, surprise, surprise, the Japanese carrieres have all the slots they need at HND. Gone is the seventh daily to Osaka (I'm making up an example), in comes a round-trip to ORD. Gone is the third daily to Okinawa. In comes LAX. Etc.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 5,113
Likes: 0
...or did I get that wrong, and the bilateral only allows for 40 slots total, forever, from HND to the US?
20 go to Japanese carriers. The remaining 20 are divided up amongst everyone else with 4 going to the US.
Not all of those 20 slots going domestically are going to go to the US. My guess is a lot will be to Europe.
Nu
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




