|
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 747107)
Richard was asked in his "chat" about the baggage fees if they were appropiate. His response was essentially that we are charging increase fees because we can.
Stupid question, does having to gate check 20+ bags per flight really help the operation? Do you think it will impact future bookings / loyalty? I personally think DAL made a big error when we decided to charge for bags and aligned ourselves with NWA (not knocking NWA ... just saying). I see the profit potential in charging for bags, but I think the 2nd increase is not good for our passengers. Any thoughts? Well, when it give the company 130 million plus a year in revenue, yes it is a good business decision. They are even talking about charging ppl at the gate with those hand held FOB's. Not DAL per se but airlines in general. Get off of price line and do it the way WN does and maybe you can play that game. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 747086)
Exactly. Filing claims like this doesn't exactly help matters. The irony comes from the fact that the claim states that the 777 is replacing 742 flying.
When was the last time you saw a 742 in DTW on a regular basis? Not to mention flying the point to point legs they are doing. What a waste of money and energy.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 747090)
Both the North and the South though an assessment, have paid one million each in to a fund for these types of things. There goes your money.
(This post in no way is intended to disparage the intergity of any ALPA union member.) :) |
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 747094)
Maybe we've spent too much time on L&G:confused:
MY LIVING WILL Last night, my kids and I were sitting in the living room and I said to them, 'I never want to live in a vegetative state, dependent on some machine and fluids from a bottle. If that ever happens, just pull the plug.' They got up, unplugged the Computer, and threw out my beer. They're such *********s ... |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 747110)
Exactly!! Please everyone, don't forget that..........both sides
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 747119)
But the arbitrators can....
One theory on why Roberts kept writting such crappy awards......kept the gravy train running:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by dragon
(Post 747094)
Maybe we've spent too much time on L&G:confused:
MY LIVING WILL Last night, my kids and I were sitting in the living room and I said to them, 'I never want to live in a vegetative state, dependent on some machine and fluids from a bottle. If that ever happens, just pull the plug.' They got up, unplugged the Computer, and threw out my beer. They're such *********s ... |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 747122)
that easily might be one of the funniest damn things I've ever read on this forum.
copied and mass mailed to all my homies:D |
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 747105)
That's not the one going to arbitration. The 742 one is being "studied". The DRC has no control over who files what.
Reading comprehension was never one of my strong points... |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 747076)
It's a she, and I didn't feed her........just bought her a drink:D
Ferd; Were you a swabbie or AF? AF guys do the dundee check first. |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 747120)
Oh no, the arbitratiors like this stuff..........keeps paying for their kids college.
One theory on why Roberts kept writting such crappy awards......kept the gravy train running:rolleyes: And they aren't cheap either. The arbitrators or the kids. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:03 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands