![]() |
Thanks for participating :) Sorry for everyone else who got tied up in a scope debate between us two.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769836)
Ball is in your Court. I ask that you tell us:
(1) Why going forward is the 76 seat RJ with current weight limitations the logical hinge point for outsourcing? My opinion is it was at 70 seats but 1113C raised the bar by a first class section. Now that those jets are off property, it is not the economics of operation is it is the economics of buy back. A point was lost on citing "opinion." Here are a few documented opinions: JB - Left seat of the 777 BK - 76 seats, the jobs below that are worth less LM - It depends, 76 seats works for now TD - Go for scope purity and let the airlines figure out how to buy airplanes & staff the rest of their employees Subjective opinions can not be counted on and result in a beauty contest, which can be won by Ms. South Carolina based on her "poise" :YouTube - Miss Teen USA 2007 - South Carolina answers a question
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769836)
(2) Will this job security breakwater hold in future bargaining?
According to some we are just delaying the inevitable. I disagree. It depends on education. You know this. Showing our group that the 100 seat concession in the next Ch11 round will effect their jobs will in the end make the group as a whole decide that standing strong at all costs is worth it. Until then it is a question mark. I have answered this before. I know I am willing to fight for that line. Period. Simply put after that it is not my fight as if I survive the sale, the career will not be worth having with my seniority. Even if I was senior enough to clear this collision, I would fight for it. Why? That is simple, my job will be next. We will lose unless we return to our representational roots. The Romans understood this, the Christians understood this. Great, enduring, powers, have inclusion as a matter of policy. Apartied government structures inevitably fail as the elites draw an ever smaller circle until they are overthrown.
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769836)
(3) Is it appropriate for our union to allow one pilot to deal away another pilot's job security and career progression?
Loaded question. Are you suggesting we dump ALPA and go to the Jet Blue style of contract where each pilot signs their own five year deal? If not you need to have a group that takes the best interest of the gander and not a single goose to mind. IMO, D-ALPA is morphing more to a position that is favorable to this. Back to you! The only way our Association is relevant is if we return to the basics. As Dave Behnke said "If one pilot has a problem, we all have a problem." We may have to make pragmatic compromises, but our union was founded on the very principle that junior pilots would replace more senior pilots cheaper unless we came together and put up barriers to pilot replacement. In your example, the Gander has gotten senile and forgotten why he ever hooked up with the Goose to begin with. When he's sitting fat, slow and alone on a lake, he's an easy target. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 769841)
On a side note,
Anybody know how long a delinquent credit card payment stays on a credit report? I missed one 5+ years ago during my Flight Instruction days and all 3 agencies still show it! :confused: When will they let it go?? :( |
Originally Posted by JobHopper
(Post 769858)
7 years. Some transgressions, like bankruptcy, stay for 10.:eek:
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 769434)
Nu;
Large Animal Medicine. That is where it is at. Oh I don't know.. I'll bet paris hilton pays some good coin when that rat she carries around sneezes... |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 769841)
On a side note,
Anybody know how long a delinquent credit card payment stays on a credit report? I missed one 5+ years ago during my Flight Instruction days and all 3 agencies still show it! :confused: When will they let it go?? :( |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 769490)
That's an awfully broad brush you're painting with there Satch. There are many in that group that do not feel the same way.............myself included.
Denny |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 769524)
+1 but man there are a lot of senior folks who really really want it. I must've heard it from a lot of the ER pilots I flew with.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 769844)
Quote: ACL65 Bar; I told you Slow would jump on here and tell you they had been done. Originally Posted by acl65pilot http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/im...s/viewpost.gif Bar; I told you Slow would jump on here and tell you they had been done. Of course. I understand that prior to the merger, prior to bankruptcy, economic analysis was done. btw, while the methods were different, they came to the same result. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 769871)
Oh I don't know.. I'll bet paris hilton pays some good coin when that rat she carries around sneezes...
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 769881)
Again, Bar, you're wrong. There were meetings as recently as last March/April to determine if costs were being appropriately allocated among DCI/Mainline carrier in the determination of aircraft routes and profitability. We looked at the different methods NWA and DAL had used in making those decisions and how merged Delta was going to do it going forward.
btw, while the methods were different, they came to the same result. Well you saved me the trouble of telling him that. The numbers are new. They were run again after the CPS issue. Not because of it, just after it. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:51 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands