Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

acl65pilot 06-17-2010 09:27 AM

Well this little squatting match will probably get is 50 pages. Lets get divisive right as we head in to the most important PWA negotiating cycle.

Also, just to point out the SLI was arbitrated, not agreed to. It was a third party that gave two hoots about you and I. Their were "impartial" and we got their point of view.
FWIW, F-DAL pilots like myself have moved down too, and a lot. I am one of the luckier ones that I am clinging on to my seat, but many have not. It was not one seat but two or three. I do not complain, why? It is over. I have moved on, and realize that we need to focus on tomorrows battles and no try to rehash ones that are in the history books. We can fix some things, but there is a lot that is what it is.

Want to fix the DC, write your reps and every LEC rep every day. Make it an issue that gains consensus. It has been explained on here why it is the way it is, and it appears that is not acceptable, so force your leadership to work for you.

Also, blaming ALPA for the SLI is short sighted. WE the pilots of DAL agreed and ratified the JPWA and the TFA. We are to responsible for what we have.

acl65pilot 06-17-2010 09:29 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 828087)
For what??

Their seniority, not longevity. NWA generally hired dispatchers off the street so a guy with less longevity was holding better skeds than a guy that was an internal transfer at DAL. So they ratioed their "seniority" so that post integration they would hold a similar schedule to what they did at their pre-merger airline.

johnso29 06-17-2010 09:34 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 828088)
Well this little squatting match will probably get is 50 pages. Lets get divisive right as we head in to the most important PWA negotiating cycle.

Also, just to point out the SLI was arbitrated, not agreed to. It was a third party that gave two hoots about you and I. Their were "impartial" and we got their point of view.
FWIW, F-DAL pilots like myself have moved down too, and a lot. I am one of the luckier ones that I am clinging on to my seat, but many have not. It was not one seat but two or three. I do not complain, why? It is over. I have moved on, and realize that we need to focus on tomorrows battles and no try to rehash ones that are in the history books. We can fix some things, but there is a lot that is what it is.

Want to fix the DC, write your reps and every LEC rep every day. Make it an issue that gains consensus. It has been explained on here why it is the way it is, and it appears that is not acceptable, so force your leadership to work for you.

Also, blaming ALPA for the SLI is short sighted. WE the pilots of DAL agreed and ratified the JPWA and the TFA. We are to responsible for what we have.

I have ZERO beef with the SLI. But don't think it's fair that I get less DC because of a pension that I don't even get. Not to mention I'll get less then a newhire. How is that fair?

jabwmu 06-17-2010 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 828075)
I feel your pain. As a NWA 08 hire I get 6% to my 401K while a flow up at the end of this year will get 10%. Not to mention his longevity will be determined by DOH while mine is some random date that DAL got to determine for their convient 'net zero'. Oh, and I couldn't even vote on the JCBA so I just got the crap sandwich shoved down my throat not to mention the hundreds of procedure changes.

I really hope DALPA does the right thing and fixes the longevity/DC issue to match everyone else. After all, we are in unity......right? :rolleyes:

Also completely agree and wrote similiar to this in my comments section. I hope everyone else did too.

Sink r8 06-17-2010 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by Superpilot92 (Post 828061)
Next question, how would someone have gotten access to this if it was comments on a alpa survey?

I suspect the answer is that the author forwarded it to make a point. CTRL-C; CTRL-V.

At least that better be the answer. I doubt DALPA is stupid enough to post this on their own. Unless, of course, it's some kind of disgruntled committee member that feel they were slighted somehow.

Either way, this discussion is crap. If a guy that lives in ATL isn't happy about a payraise and dropping the commute, and can only focus on his forecast of where he would have been in a hypothetical world in ten years, then [expletive deleted] him.

acl65pilot 06-17-2010 09:37 AM

Johnso, What I think does not matter. What mattes is what the NWA negotiating team thought was fair. If I had a beef it would be with them for selling you short. This is their part of the deal, or at least how it has been framed on here and other places.

My suggestion is that it be one of the items we get in the next LOA. I know it does not help "all" pilots but it helps with unity and that is key.

acl65pilot 06-17-2010 09:40 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 828096)
I suspect the answer is that the author forwarded it to make a point. CTRL-C; CTRL-V.

At least that better be the answer. I doubt DALPA is stupid enough to post this on their own. Unless, of course, it's some kind of disgruntled committee member that feel they were slighted somehow.

Either way, this discussion is crap. If a guy that lives in ATL isn't happy about a payraise and dropping the commute, and can only focus on his forecast of where he would have been in a hypothetical world in ten years, then [expletive deleted] him.

I doubt that this was forwarded by alpa. As you say, Ctrl C, Ctrl V then send. FWIW, I beleive that ALPA has not even seen any of it. From the e-mail they saw 20% participation and extended it to make the survey scientific. In that regard, call all your buds and implore them to do it.

shiznit 06-17-2010 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by keenster (Post 828050)
My June 2010 SS# is 4,5xx. The DAL guy hired the same day as me, #2,6xx. (I’ll do the math for you, that’s 1,870#’s) I’m almost 49 yrs old. That is a huge disparity, forever......

DTW 747 f/o, 22+ yrs with the company, on reserve, not by choice.

OK. The most junior "4,5xx" is 135/200 on the DTW744B list for June.

The PBS actual line count for DTW744B in June is 147.

135 is Guaranteed a line......FAIL.

http://kyle.stoddardfamily.net/pictu...IFs/bsflag.gif


BTW....The next number below him that is holding an ATL position is ATLM88A.....202/473.....LINEHOLDER!!

(actually better percentage wise than his commute seat, not to mention $12/hr. more including intl. ovrd.)

Sink r8 06-17-2010 09:45 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 828092)
I have ZERO beef with the SLI. But don't think it's fair that I get less DC because of a pension that I don't even get. Not to mention I'll get less then a newhire. How is that fair?

We all agree that this isn't fair, but it is a short-lived problem. What isn't a short-lived problem is the seniority divide that could potentially resurface on this point. There are plenty of guys that can make very, very coherent arguments that they got screwed in terms of retirement. And each one of those is a little blow to the precious unity that might yield results when we negotiate. Each argument like this gets us one step closer to some sort of "matrix", or other mechanism to "rectify" everyone's retirement picture. And there isn't one such outcome out there that you or I, as fairly junior pilots, would like.

I suggest you quit complaining about what you get relative to a newhire, and focus on the difference between where you've been, and where you are. And please do that quickly, so we can focus on where we're going instead.

Ferd149 06-17-2010 09:50 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 828096)
Either way, this discussion is crap. If a guy that lives in ATL isn't happy about a payraise and dropping the commute, and can only focus on his forecast of where he would have been in a hypothetical world in ten years, then [expletive deleted] him.

Come on sink.........it isn't crap!

I've always been thankful for the raise but neither of us is where we were or where we should be so lets don't pat ourselves too much.

I agree with Super, I have no beef with the SLI. As NewK and I have said numerous times, us '95 guys keep our mouths shut when the SLI comes up for good reasons.

But, everything else, while over the top, is true. I understand adopt and go and confuse the small number than the big number. But, you have to admit, the division of labor in this marriage has just $ucked. From procedures to bidding to uniforms to insurance (and the list goes on) you guys have never said "it's cool guys, we've got this one just relax".

Over time, I've come to believe "adopt and go" is just code for "let the NWA guys do it." I'm ok so far, but please don't blow sunshine up my buttocks.

Rant over!:D
Your Uncle Ferd


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands