As has been said before, and influenced by a few glasses of wine, I don't care why anyone has a beef with the -9. It is flown by mainline pilots. That's all I care about. I'm about 20% up the list on the 757 and flown Boeing my entire eight year career at DAL. However, I'm beginning to think that with my anticipated displacement, that a DC9 SIC rating lies in my future. As much as I don't want to leave the 757, I'd rather be an employed DAL pilot flying the -9 Super 80 Series, than a furloughed pilot hoping to fly any DAL jet.
The fact is, no one should care about how long the -9 stays with DAL. As long as we have mainline aircraft on the property, no one should care if its a DC7 or a 747-400. Mainline jobs is all I care about. Period. Protection of mainline jobs is all I care about. Without that, we aren't worth a whole lot. So as far as I'm concerned, I hope that the last DC9 pilot at Delta is in the first grade. That means that we've kept 1000 extra jobs on the property instead of seeing them disappear. When I was hired at DAL I was Seniority #10125. With the merger of 5000 pilots, I am 1000 less than that. Somewhere in the last few years, both sides have let 5000 jobs disappear most likely never to return. This is THE fight! |
Originally Posted by Rhino Driver
(Post 535672)
The C-9 is currently flown by the Navy at Oceana, Atlanta, Willow Grove, and Widbey. Probably 16-20 or so C-9's still flying.
|
You are correct - I believe that they are at Navy Fort Worth - home to the Navy VR wing. This was all brought about in the last BRAC cycle.
Scoop |
Originally Posted by DAL4EVER
(Post 535996)
As has been said before, and influenced by a few glasses of wine, I don't care why anyone has a beef with the -9. It is flown by mainline pilots. That's all I care about. I'm about 20% up the list on the 757 and flown Boeing my entire eight year career at DAL. However, I'm beginning to think that with my anticipated displacement, that a DC9 SIC rating lies in my future. As much as I don't want to leave the 757, I'd rather be an employed DAL pilot flying the -9 Super 80 Series, than a furloughed pilot hoping to fly any DAL jet.
The fact is, no one should care about how long the -9 stays with DAL. As long as we have mainline aircraft on the property, no one should care if its a DC7 or a 747-400. Mainline jobs is all I care about. Period. Protection of mainline jobs is all I care about. Without that, we aren't worth a whole lot. So as far as I'm concerned, I hope that the last DC9 pilot at Delta is in the first grade. That means that we've kept 1000 extra jobs on the property instead of seeing them disappear. When I was hired at DAL I was Seniority #10125. With the merger of 5000 pilots, I am 1000 less than that. Somewhere in the last few years, both sides have let 5000 jobs disappear most likely never to return. This is THE fight! Preach on, brotha! preach on! |
Originally Posted by Superpilot92
(Post 535989)
I did write my reps and EVERYONE should do the same! This MUST be a major issue. Giving away OUR jobs to the lowest bidders is the absolute dumbest thing we can do. Those that thought they were "protected" were but only their jobs. Outsourcing only pushed thousands of pilots farther from upgrade and made less mainline jobs available for thousands of others. This is a huge issue and the more planes and Jobs at mainline the better all of our pay, schedules, careers, and QOLs will go up.
Write them ALPA's history is to sell scope when times get rough. IMHO we need to look at our near horizon:
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 535974)
Hey, we laid right there for the adoption of NWA's outsourcing plan during the JPWA. I know Super wrote his Rep. But most of the folks on this board lack the will to corner their Reps and push for our job protections. Who's willing to push a unpopular resolution through an LEC meeting? Until we stop "reveling in our abandon" nothing is going to change. Same song, second verse....
My recollection is that during DAL's contract re-negotiation during bankruptcy the pilot group emphatically told the MEC that they did not want ANY changes to scope beyond the (then) current 70 seat limit. The MEC capitulated and the 76 seat jet was allowed. Many (former) DAL pilots refer to the 76 seat jets as "Moak Jets" in "honor" of MEC chairman Lee Moak. It was "amazing" how quickly those aircraft showed up. I strongly suspect they had been on order well before the "negotiations". |
It's alway next time isn't it.
I'm sure all of you guys were saying a year ago that come the next contract we're going to recapture some of our flying. What happened just a few months ago. Everyone was complaining that they weren't getting a big enough share of the pie. There were plenty of delta guys saying the pay increase (%) should have been the same as NWA's and did nothing about the flying. Hell you were all scared that the dc9 flying was going to go away just like your 737-200/300. You were talking possible furloughs but you did absolutely nothing about recapturing 70+ seats so that it doesn't happen. It's going to cost real dollars to get those planes back and I really doubt any of you are willing to do that unless you are very junior. Both sides just proved that a few months back. |
Anyone want to ballpark what it'd cost us to get 76 seaters on the DAL mainline pilot side? Are we talking giving up $5/hr, $10/hr, or more plus work rules? Or just creating another Delta Express?
... And, is the parking of the 757s and 767s just for upgrades or is this the future of our operation in which margin management trumps CASM? The margin (not CASM but margin) is greater with a 142 seater than a 184 seater on a market segment that demands a 170 seater, thus park the 184 seaters? Use one plane smaller than the plane you need to build margin? ... Sidetrack, 747 being painted in DAL colors video: Delta News Network |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 536263)
Sidetrack, 747 being painted in DAL colors video: Delta News Network
|
Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
(Post 536159)
Bar,
My recollection is that during DAL's contract re-negotiation during bankruptcy the pilot group emphatically told the MEC that they did not want ANY changes to scope beyond the (then) current 70 seat limit. The MEC capitulated and the 76 seat jet was allowed. Many (former) DAL pilots refer to the 76 seat jets as "Moak Jets" in "honor" of MEC chairman Lee Moak. It was "amazing" how quickly those aircraft showed up. I strongly suspect they had been on order well before the "negotiations". Actually the jets were already here, and flying regularly. The scope change didn't allow for new jets, it allowed seats. The jets that had been flying with 70 seats were reconfigured with 76 seats. That's all that changed. I was still philosophically opposed to them, but those are the facts. PG |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:18 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands