![]() |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 856914)
If we're keeping the 95s, can they get new APUs?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 856919)
He's used to 250 to the marker on the ERJ145. :D
Which actually worked if you were agressive and went idle power, gear down and put the flaps down on speed (no 10 below limit) and it worked. Of course, MTOW was at least 1/2 the ZFW of an empty mainline plane. But still that technique worked. It usually caused the other pilot to snicker at you to see if you'd pull it off before 1000'. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 857072)
It was even easier in the XR because you could go Flaps 45 @ 160 KIAS as opposed to 145 KIAS. You could do 250 KIAS to the marker no prob in that thing. :D
I realize you guys are talking about other airplanes and slightly different profiles, etc. But I just wanted to make double sure nobody got the wrong idea from what I posted earlier. Sitting around on reserve being my avatar... (with a clear conscience now):D |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 857086)
Okay... now you guys are starting to worry me just a little. Don't get the wrong idea from my earlier posts. That 250 to 10 miles coming down the glideslope rule of thumb on the 88 is a minimum distance to start configuring. It works perfect right at 10 miles (assuming you don't have a tailwind). But if you wait until closer in than 10 miles, you will violate the stabilized approach criteria and, as you know, that is a mandatory go-around which will blow several months of your fuel savings efforts.
I realize you guys are talking about other airplanes and slightly different profiles, etc. But I just wanted to make double sure nobody got the wrong idea from what I posted earlier. Sitting around on reserve being my avatar... (with a clear conscience now):D No, no, no. We are reminiscing on old commuter days. I fly the 320, and we meet the stabilized approach criteria quite well as a fleet. They usually always restrict us to 180 KIAS by LOC intercept anyway so it's no prob to meet them. :) |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 857049)
Not really... a big percentage of Delta Dollars never get cashed in. FLights go out full.. the oversales get something (which they overwhelmingly never use) and everybody's (somewhat) happy. The statistic just gives the media and shumer more ammunition to beat up on the airlines...
I personally wish we could switch to a system more like JetBlu, where we don't oversell as much, but I have to agree with T. The Delta miles are close to being worthless - a lot of people never cash them in and to top it off about half the people volunteer and act like they just won the lottery. But it sure does make it a lot harder to non-rev.:( Scoop |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 857092)
No, no, no. We are reminiscing on old commuter days. I fly the 320, and we meet the stabilized approach criteria quite well as a fleet. They usually always restrict us to 180 KIAS by LOC intercept anyway so it's no prob to meet them. :)
Interesting point you brought up about the speed restrictions we often see from ATC. Maybe the 320 mostly flies to large hub type airports. But on the 88 and the -9, we often fly to smaller airports where ATC doesn't hold your hand during the approach. The ability to do what I was talking about earlier presents itself quite often flying the 88 and the -9. In 12 years of flying out of ATL, I usually even got the opportunity to do it going in there a couple of times a year during those rare times when there was no one ahead of us on the approach and they didn't give us any speed restrictions. I've seen lots of guys slow down and configure early in those situations because they just assume that's what the controllers want. A little SA goes a long way. But the point I'm trying to make is that we should take advantage of the opportunity to save fuel whenever the situation presents itself and it makes sense to do so. To me, that's just part of being a professional aviator. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 857016)
OH WHAT THE H--- FERD? SERIOUSLY?
http://www.glasersigngroup.com/galle...Shop%20003.JPG FTB is in a facepalm. |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 857117)
I personally wish we could switch to a system more like JetBlu, where we don't oversell as much, but I have to agree with T. The Delta miles are close to being worthless - a lot of people never cash them in and to top it off about half the people volunteer and act like they just won the lottery.
But it sure does make it a lot harder to non-rev.:( Scoop Then there's the flights where they don't get enough volunteers. Those cost real cash, not Delta dollars. Still -- the company continues to do it on a regular basis so they must have calculated that they will make more money by overbooking. It just seems like a short-sighted strategy to intentionally make your customers angry. Guess I'm not management material. |
Check, statistically only about 25% of those "Delta Dollars" are used. So, yes, it is a smart program for Delta to employ.
Also by keep the loads near 85% it allows DAL to eek almost every dollar possible out of their jets. I have noticed that on many routes they dump tickets are few hrs prior to departure. The problem is that there is a decent sector of our customers that are starting to realize this. There appears to be some strength in pricing. That comes from a mix of demand and tight capacity constraint. Generally this can be accomplished with relatively flat variable costs. When the price of these goes up the need for more seats to spread these costs out goes up. When variable costs rise in close relation to the inflationary rate, it allows constrained capacity. Ugly but true. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 857054)
Nobody is asking you to taxi SE with a max gross airplane on asphalt in 100 degree weather. You are just being obstinate now with all this... So don't ever leave the chocks big boy because this same thing can happen with both of 'em running... sorry bro.. but your post is a FAIL.
Oh and as far as it being a "captain's airline" (whatever that means) answer this: which of the two former airlines' captains gives the choice of rest break to the pilot flying as opposed to himself? Which former airline had captains that did a bigger percentage of walkarounds? Shall I continue? Sometimes people need to be told that they are acting like an ass, this is one of them. Re-read my post in a way that views the poster (me) as being friendly and helpful in a nice way. Read the posts I was responding to. Read the subsequent posts. Go back to bed and wake up on the other, nicer side of the bed. Thanks. New K (No time for fighting with people who want to fight over stupid ummm, crap.) By the way, I was told and have experienced that Delta is a captains airline, in a GOOD way. That's what I meant. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:10 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands