Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Others post factually incorrect things about the fNWA contract. I refute it. They say, prove it. I prove it with the actual data. You call it sniveling.
If you have no other capability but to wrongly interpret what's going on around you, maybe you should try to improve on that before you post.
Carl
I do not know why we continue these pointless arguments. Both DAL and WA were in BK contracts that were less then stellar. If it was not for the merger neither pilot group would have received any raises, i.e. LOA 19 for fDAL and the JCBA for NWA.
fDAL would be in contract talks now, granted a good time for it and fNWA would be waiting another year. Would either or both carriers have furloughed last year? Would either have hired? The answer is no one knows and to look back and getting into these ****ing contests is worthless.
I had a fDAL pilot in the crew room the other day tell me that fNWA pilots should get less in profit sharing because we got a bigger raise. We talked about it for a bit in a rationale non internet sort of way. At the end we both decided that we were better of together in the long run in a merger. Especially considering the other dance partners.
fDAL would be in contract talks now, granted a good time for it and fNWA would be waiting another year. Would either or both carriers have furloughed last year? Would either have hired? The answer is no one knows and to look back and getting into these ****ing contests is worthless.
I had a fDAL pilot in the crew room the other day tell me that fNWA pilots should get less in profit sharing because we got a bigger raise. We talked about it for a bit in a rationale non internet sort of way. At the end we both decided that we were better of together in the long run in a merger. Especially considering the other dance partners.
When I make a mistake, I say so. I don't make excuses and blame a "DAL pilot" for the bad data.
Carl
Inventory survival kit ..
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: Seeking no jacket required rotations
Here is an idea lifted from the fNW contract.
Take the blockholder without a block language and apply it to DL reserves using SC and LC.
SC eligible gets 75 hours guarantee.
LC only (no SC) 68 hour guarantee (insert your version of guarantee here).
Would obviously have to be some language about minimum number of people required to be eligible for SC blah blah...
There would be other considerations as well, I'm just not going to list them all here since its a hypothetical.
Take the blockholder without a block language and apply it to DL reserves using SC and LC.
SC eligible gets 75 hours guarantee.
LC only (no SC) 68 hour guarantee (insert your version of guarantee here).
Would obviously have to be some language about minimum number of people required to be eligible for SC blah blah...
There would be other considerations as well, I'm just not going to list them all here since its a hypothetical.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
There you go again, Carl. Jackson Pollock would be proud of your painting style. By the way, you need a new drop cloth.
Care to point out the examples of your "complaint," or do those of your ilk prefer to just drive by...?

Care to point out the examples of your "complaint," or do those of your ilk prefer to just drive by...?
This is an example of what I mean when I say that you make things up.
Carl
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 851
Likes: 0

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






