Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 3105813)
When are YS processed, at the next window or 0700 day before the trip? Looking to get a "fini flight" before 1 Sep. Thanks
|
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 3105813)
When are YS processed, at the next window or 0700 day before the trip? Looking to get a "fini flight" before 1 Sep. Thanks
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3105851)
Call your CP and have him buy the trip you want for a final flight. That way you will have some notice to set up,family and friends ect..
|
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 3105813)
When are YS processed, at the next window or 0700 day before the trip? Looking to get a "fini flight" before 1 Sep. Thanks
yeah, what they all said. |
Quick question for those having taken SYS ESV lately. Memory items are no longer on ESV but evaluated during Procedures MV, and all checkrides after that right?
Thx |
They were not on eSV.....but that’s as far as I’ve gotten! I believe they are tested on 241.
|
Originally Posted by Abouttime2fish
(Post 3105946)
They were not on eSV.....but that’s as far as I’ve gotten! I believe they are tested on 241.
|
it Seems I’m unsuccessful with the Success Factors App. Anybody have any luck with offline mode? I download the lessons, but when I watch them offline I can’t get more than about four “pages” in, then the loading prompt pops up and stays on. Dead in the water after that.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3105851)
Call your CP and have him buy the trip you want for a final flight. That way you will have some notice to set up,family and friends ect..
|
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 3106218)
Just called DTW CPO. Not allowed.......
|
Originally Posted by badflaps
(Post 3106230)
Disappointing for sure, but not totally unexpected. That whole early out program gives me the willies.
Denny |
Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
(Post 3105675)
I believe it was a question during the live comments. But regardless, they want to use it. And he said he believes that the pandemic qualifies as a situation that they can use it. Unbelievable.
|
Originally Posted by RAH RAH REE
(Post 3105675)
I believe it was a question during the live comments. But regardless, they want to use it. And he said he believes that the pandemic qualifies as a situation that they can use it. Unbelievable.
|
Can you still jump seat if your NQ?
|
Originally Posted by Sparky
(Post 3107390)
Can you still jump seat if your NQ?
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3107400)
if your NQ what?
|
Originally Posted by Sparky
(Post 3107390)
Can you still jump seat if your NQ?
|
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3107400)
if your NQ what?
Eats, shoots, and leaves |
Mil Leave on Reserve...
I know this has been answered in here somewhere in the past, but I'm no good at searching for old stuff on here...
If you pre-post mil leave, then bid reserve... I understand it counts against your days available and thus lowers your reserve guarantee. Once the bid awards are posted, can you then go back and move X days over your mil leave and get credit back up to the guarantee? I thought I remembered reading this but can't remember... and when i did, I wasn't bidding reserve. Thanks! |
Originally Posted by justwanttofly
(Post 3107513)
I know this has been answered in here somewhere in the past, but I'm no good at searching for old stuff on here...
If you pre-post mil leave, then bid reserve... I understand it counts against your days available and thus lowers your reserve guarantee. Once the bid awards are posted, can you then go back and move X days over your mil leave and get credit back up to the guarantee? I thought I remembered reading this but can't remember... and when i did, I wasn't bidding reserve. Thanks! |
Originally Posted by tunes
(Post 3107522)
yes you can, if you are facebook, join the military affairs facebook page. this and other things are covered there.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3107587)
I believe this is incorrect. Moving X days onto MLOA to turn them into MLOX only works for mil leave entered after the initial award... if I'm not mistaken.
After the initial award, one can move X days over MLOA only IF it complies with the grouping requirements. Thus, one needs to add them to existing blocks of on-call days or build a whole new block. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
looking for some help here.
I got a new iPhone (11 Pro) and am having issues getting MiCrew 4.4. I tried uninstalling/reinstalling the workspace app and logging into that app, but it took me to a username/password page and now I'm lost. Any ideas? Please and thank you! |
Originally Posted by Crown
(Post 3108733)
looking for some help here.
I got a new iPhone (11 Pro) and am having issues getting MiCrew 4.4. I tried uninstalling/reinstalling the workspace app and logging into that app, but it took me to a username/password page and now I'm lost. Any ideas? Please and thank you! Search DeltaNet for the new instructions to download the Hub app which replaced the WorkSpace app several months ago. |
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 3107587)
I believe this is incorrect. Moving X days onto MLOA to turn them into MLOX only works for mil leave entered after the initial award... if I'm not mistaken.
|
Originally Posted by StartngOvr
(Post 3105825)
As Sailing said, the issue is the minimum block hour requirement, not the production balance. In my opinion, I think we should take the opportunity to offer relief on the block hour floor in exchange for PERMANENT improvements in the production balance. We should start at 75/25 in our favor and negotiate down to 60/40.
Can’t believe iaflyer is so ready to give relief on the production balance. To be willing allow even greater numbers of our highest paying positions to be outsourced so casually is disturbing. Force Majeure - beyond the company's control - is defined in the PWA and "pandemic" is not part of the defined term. The company would have to argue the contract means something that is explicitly not stated; or that events overwhelm the entire PWA. ... and if we are trying to toss the PWA, how about management just ajust the ALV and tell us to grieve it? I see scope as much more sancrosanct than ALV - on balance - a person's job v another person getting paid more to do absolutely nothing. We, line pilots, need leverage on boths sides. For starters I suggest UNAs send Reps and Managers photos of their children. Humanize who is getting harmed. I've asked my Reps to pull permits for informational picketing if the company pulls the trigger on furloughs. Looks pretty bad to be taking taxpayer money, furloughing pilots and sending revenue to Aeromexico. Adults could sit down and see a solution by which the company doesn't furlough or displace in exchange for our forbearance on the mother of all scope grievances |
Capt September schedules are out...
|
[QUOTE=Bucking Bar;3109575....
The company is not going to negotiate outside the fences of their commercial agreements. They can agree to putting our fence right along their fenceline....[/QUOTE] Given the bankruptcy status of multiple JV partners, one would think this would be a unique opportunity to negotiate the redrawing of the fence lines. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 3109575)
Force Majeure - beyond the company's control - is defined in the PWA and "pandemic" is not part of the defined term. The company would have to argue the contract means something that is explicitly not stated; or that events overwhelm the entire PWA
|
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 3109835)
I've said it before but never underestimate the ability of the NMB mediator to find a circumstance over which the company does not have control. Pre 9/11 in C2K, the term terrorist act was not in the force majeure definition yet 1,300+ were furloughed over the course of nearly a year and a half past the event. Just because "pandemic" isn't in there doesn't mean the "neutral" won't deem COVID a circumstance over which the company does not have control.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 3109843)
Our current contract does list items covered by FM but includes the term “Includes but not limited to” as a preface. We will lose if we try and argue covid is not a FM event. I doubt the union would even argue it unless they just want to blow money.
They're going to use FM. No doubt. JL didn't just let that one slip. They are going to stomp all over our contract and use it for catbox liner. China flu is their wet dream. The only hope we have is a non-biased mediator. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3109873)
So what you';re saying is that you agree with me that the company can pretty much do whatever they want WRT the contract. The end result is we end up in court. How that plays out depends. Same as it ever was. However, until such time that the case is ruled upon, the effect is still ongoing unless a prelim stay is invoked. Fun times coming for sure.
They're going to use FM. No doubt. JL didn't just let that one slip. They are going to stomp all over our contract and use it for catbox liner. China flu is their wet dream. The only hope we have is a non-biased mediator. |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3109902)
If our contract is that meaningless, why haven’t they lowered ALVs already?
My guess is because we are taking tax payer money. I still have a hard time believing FM would be an option after being floated for 6 months by our government. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by OOfff
(Post 3109902)
If our contract is that meaningless, why haven’t they lowered ALVs already?
Who's to say they are not planning on doing that regardless? You act as if they won't. Yes, they haven't done it yet. |
Originally Posted by FL370esq
(Post 3109835)
I've said it before but never underestimate the ability of the NMB mediator to find a circumstance over which the company does not have control. Pre 9/11 in C2K, the term terrorist act was not in the force majeure definition yet 1,300+ were furloughed over the course of nearly a year and a half past the event. Just because "pandemic" isn't in there doesn't mean the "neutral" won't deem COVID a circumstance over which the company does not have control.
Minor point, but it won’t be an NMB mediator who makes that call. It would be a neutral selected by ALPA and the company under 19.G.2. I agree with your larger point, when there is a grey area neutrals usually side with the company. They also tend to respond to necessity of business arguments very favorably. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3109873)
So what you';re saying is that you agree with me that the company can pretty much do whatever they want WRT the contract. The end result is we end up in court. How that plays out depends. Same as it ever was. However, until such time that the case is ruled upon, the effect is still ongoing unless a prelim stay is invoked. Fun times coming for sure.
They're going to use FM. No doubt. JL didn't just let that one slip. They are going to stomp all over our contract and use it for catbox liner. China flu is their wet dream. The only hope we have is a non-biased mediator. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3109873)
So what you';re saying is that you agree with me that the company can pretty much do whatever they want WRT the contract. The end result is we end up in court. How that plays out depends. Same as it ever was. However, until such time that the case is ruled upon, the effect is still ongoing unless a prelim stay is invoked. Fun times coming for sure.
They're going to use FM. No doubt. JL didn't just let that one slip. They are going to stomp all over our contract and use it for catbox liner. China flu is their wet dream. The only hope we have is a non-biased mediator. |
Originally Posted by Iceberg
(Post 3109989)
You think management enjoyed the dream where revenue was decimated and billions in profits were turned into billions in losses but, omg, they were able to get concessions from the pilots? My guess is the “wet” part was tears.
they are not tied to the airline like we are. They can move on very easily and most likely will find a soft landing if the worse happens to the airline. I don't shed a tear for them. Not one. We'll see soon enough how they plan to gut the PWA forthwith. Lucky I VEOP on 1 Sept. You'll have to deal with the fallout and the absolute decimation of your QOL. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3109996)
There was much they could do along the way yet they rode the train.
they are not tied to the airline like we are. They can move on very easily and most likely will find a soft landing if the worse happens to the airline. I don't shed a tear for them. Not one. We'll see soon enough how they plan to gut the PWA forthwith. Lucky I VEOP on 1 Sept. You'll have to deal with the fallout and the absolute decimation of your QOL. |
Originally Posted by Phins2right
(Post 3109996)
There was much they could do along the way yet they rode the train.
they are not tied to the airline like we are. They can move on very easily and most likely will find a soft landing if the worse happens to the airline. I don't shed a tear for them. Not one. We'll see soon enough how they plan to gut the PWA forthwith. Lucky I VEOP on 1 Sept. You'll have to deal with the fallout and the absolute decimation of your QOL. My point was more along the lines of your contending the “China flu” was their wet dream because they can come after our contract. I doubt that is such a wonderful situation for them. Enjoy your retirement. I’m sure I’ll manage through the decimation of my QOL. It’s all down hill from here in the short term. Paid to stay home beats either option the UNAs are facing come 10/1 but I’m hoping to reduce the uncertainty in life by returning to a flying category. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:28 PM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands