Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2010 | 05:46 AM
  #55571  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
My point was that management will be looking for keeping us below industry standard beyond the current amendable date of our contract in return for giving pay increases prior to the current amendable date. In my opinion, that is the only way management would consider opening the contract early.

Carl
The gopher hunter has it right.
There's one other factor in play as well. Pilot morale.
You might think management doesn't care whether we are happy or not but they are currently taking advantage of a group that regularly picks up all the open time, never calls in sick and generally goes all out to get the mission accomplished. That can change quickly with just a little shift in the rhetoric coming from our union leadership.
Moak was all about cooperation and engagement and working together. That worked. Management certainly loved it. Guys bought it. The company prospered financially. The pilots, not so much. We have been operating on the principle of deferred gratification. We worked hard and worked for cheap the last few years expecting to be paid later. Well; later has arrived. We aren't willing to wait another 2 or 3 years to see some payback. Constructive engagement was supposed to be a two-way street. That's about to be tested.
If Anderson reverts to Mullin mode and points to the 2013 amendable date saying "a contract is a contract" then he's quickly going to find himself with a very angry and far less productive pilot group. The operation will suffer and we will be much more assertive and adversarial in the section 6 negotiations. What the captains write on the back of those "Thank-You" cards for our HVCs may not be what management was expecting.
I think that's why they're considering some "adjustments" prior to the amendable date.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:03 AM
  #55572  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Only in YOUR world Carl is $214 greater than $217. ?
Hourly pay rates are only part of the equation. I bet Carl is right. When the pay check comes, a SW 737 captain makes more than he does.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:06 AM
  #55573  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Never mind

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-31-2010 at 08:03 AM.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:10 AM
  #55574  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
Default

All you have to do is look at DOT stats and the DAL 10K to realize the difference between SW pay and DAL pay is retirement funding. In fact SWA's pilots block hour costs are lower than DAL's.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:16 AM
  #55575  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The gopher hunter has it right.
There's one other factor in play as well. Pilot morale.
You might think management doesn't care whether we are happy or not but they are currently taking advantage of a group that regularly picks up all the open time, never calls in sick and generally goes all out to get the mission accomplished. That can change quickly with just a little shift in the rhetoric coming from our union leadership.
Moak was all about cooperation and engagement and working together. That worked. Management certainly loved it. Guys bought it. The company prospered financially. The pilots, not so much. We have been operating on the principle of deferred gratification. We worked hard and worked for cheap the last few years expecting to be paid later. Well; later has arrived. We aren't willing to wait another 2 or 3 years to see some payback. Constructive engagement was supposed to be a two-way street. That's about to be tested.
If Anderson reverts to Mullin mode and points to the 2013 amendable date saying "a contract is a contract" then he's quickly going to find himself with a very angry and far less productive pilot group. The operation will suffer and we will be much more assertive and adversarial in the section 6 negotiations. What the captains write on the back of those "Thank-You" cards for our HVCs may not be what management was expecting.
I think that's why they're considering some "adjustments" prior to the amendable date.
Great post, Check! Spot on. The only question I have is whether or not our new MEC is going to be like our old MEC.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:35 AM
  #55576  
vprMatrix's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Default

While you can't get exact numbers for yearly block hours these links do provide some great info.

SWA

DAL

Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.

If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.

Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.

Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.

Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.


Now numbers that are much more important.

For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.

On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.

-vpr
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:41 AM
  #55577  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You're correct in that the company is under no obligation. It could make sense to them as long as they got an extension of the amendable date and our pay increases beyond that kept us below industry standard. The argument would be to get increases now for the next two years that we would not have gotten, and in return, get paid less than what they project for pilots in 2013 and 2014.

Carl
Or how to make a net loss look like a gain. It would be an relatively easy sell because we won't know what the final take could have been until we get there. I agree RA would not be interested in an early give or extensions unless he thought it cheaper in the long run.
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:44 AM
  #55578  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
Kept us below industry standard??? Carl, you need to re-check your facts. You're on the 747. You're pretty much the highest paid airline pilot out there at the moment. Here are the 1/1/2011 rates for the highest paying equipment at each airline:

DAL $217
LUV $214
AMR $205
CAL $193
UAL $190
USAir $160

And here are the rates for the 737-800 at each airline:

LUV $214
DAL $175
ALA $175
CAL $169
AMR $166
AWA $142
UAL $137
USAir $125

I agree we are way below what we used to get paid, and way below what we are "worth", but we're well above industry standard for all passenger airlines. Just the facts. Hmmm, who was the MEC Chairman that made that happen?
Come on PG,

We have, what 16 747s? Southwest has 547 737s!

So all their captains (assuming they have the longevity) are paid a higher hourly rate than all of our captains except for the few on the 747 and 777.

I'm an A-320 captain. So how is my pay relative to SWA? (Hint: It's a whole lot less.)

But I'm sure you'll point out I get a raise tomorrow and the difference will be less than 50 bucks an hour. Gee, that's so close...
Old 12-31-2010 | 06:52 AM
  #55579  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

Originally Posted by vprMatrix
While you can't get exact numbers for yearly block hours these links do provide some great info.

SWA

DAL

Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.

If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.

Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.

Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.

Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.


Now numbers that are much more important.

For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.

On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.

-vpr
Great post, thanks for researching it!!
Old 12-31-2010 | 07:07 AM
  #55580  
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Wasatch Phantom
Come on PG,

We have, what 16 747s? Southwest has 547 737s!

So all their captains (assuming they have the longevity) are paid a higher hourly rate than all of our captains except for the few on the 747 and 777.

I'm an A-320 captain. So how is my pay relative to SWA? (Hint: It's a whole lot less.)
No argument. Your pay (and mine) is a whole lot less than SWA. But that wasn't the point of my post. Carl stated that DAL will open early and give us meager pay raises to "keep us below industry standard". I simply showed that we are at or near the top of the industry at present.

One airline (SWA) does not define "industry standard". Neither do cargo carriers.

So many people continue to bad mouth our pay, while refusing to acknowledge that, in spite of how bad it is relative to the past, we are near the top at the moment. Call them bankruptcy wages if you want, but they are almost industry leading. That's pathetic, I admit, but it is what it is, and to ignore that reality, is to live in a dreamworld.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices