Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
My point was that management will be looking for keeping us below industry standard beyond the current amendable date of our contract in return for giving pay increases prior to the current amendable date. In my opinion, that is the only way management would consider opening the contract early.
Carl
Carl
There's one other factor in play as well. Pilot morale.
You might think management doesn't care whether we are happy or not but they are currently taking advantage of a group that regularly picks up all the open time, never calls in sick and generally goes all out to get the mission accomplished. That can change quickly with just a little shift in the rhetoric coming from our union leadership.
Moak was all about cooperation and engagement and working together. That worked. Management certainly loved it. Guys bought it. The company prospered financially. The pilots, not so much. We have been operating on the principle of deferred gratification. We worked hard and worked for cheap the last few years expecting to be paid later. Well; later has arrived. We aren't willing to wait another 2 or 3 years to see some payback. Constructive engagement was supposed to be a two-way street. That's about to be tested.
If Anderson reverts to Mullin mode and points to the 2013 amendable date saying "a contract is a contract" then he's quickly going to find himself with a very angry and far less productive pilot group. The operation will suffer and we will be much more assertive and adversarial in the section 6 negotiations. What the captains write on the back of those "Thank-You" cards for our HVCs may not be what management was expecting.
I think that's why they're considering some "adjustments" prior to the amendable date.
Line Holder
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,353
Likes: 54
From: 765A
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Never mind
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-31-2010 at 08:03 AM.
:-)
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 1
All you have to do is look at DOT stats and the DAL 10K to realize the difference between SW pay and DAL pay is retirement funding. In fact SWA's pilots block hour costs are lower than DAL's.
The gopher hunter has it right.
There's one other factor in play as well. Pilot morale.
You might think management doesn't care whether we are happy or not but they are currently taking advantage of a group that regularly picks up all the open time, never calls in sick and generally goes all out to get the mission accomplished. That can change quickly with just a little shift in the rhetoric coming from our union leadership.
Moak was all about cooperation and engagement and working together. That worked. Management certainly loved it. Guys bought it. The company prospered financially. The pilots, not so much. We have been operating on the principle of deferred gratification. We worked hard and worked for cheap the last few years expecting to be paid later. Well; later has arrived. We aren't willing to wait another 2 or 3 years to see some payback. Constructive engagement was supposed to be a two-way street. That's about to be tested.
If Anderson reverts to Mullin mode and points to the 2013 amendable date saying "a contract is a contract" then he's quickly going to find himself with a very angry and far less productive pilot group. The operation will suffer and we will be much more assertive and adversarial in the section 6 negotiations. What the captains write on the back of those "Thank-You" cards for our HVCs may not be what management was expecting.
I think that's why they're considering some "adjustments" prior to the amendable date.
There's one other factor in play as well. Pilot morale.
You might think management doesn't care whether we are happy or not but they are currently taking advantage of a group that regularly picks up all the open time, never calls in sick and generally goes all out to get the mission accomplished. That can change quickly with just a little shift in the rhetoric coming from our union leadership.
Moak was all about cooperation and engagement and working together. That worked. Management certainly loved it. Guys bought it. The company prospered financially. The pilots, not so much. We have been operating on the principle of deferred gratification. We worked hard and worked for cheap the last few years expecting to be paid later. Well; later has arrived. We aren't willing to wait another 2 or 3 years to see some payback. Constructive engagement was supposed to be a two-way street. That's about to be tested.
If Anderson reverts to Mullin mode and points to the 2013 amendable date saying "a contract is a contract" then he's quickly going to find himself with a very angry and far less productive pilot group. The operation will suffer and we will be much more assertive and adversarial in the section 6 negotiations. What the captains write on the back of those "Thank-You" cards for our HVCs may not be what management was expecting.
I think that's why they're considering some "adjustments" prior to the amendable date.
While you can't get exact numbers for yearly block hours these links do provide some great info.
SWA
DAL
Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.
If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.
Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.
Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.
Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.
Now numbers that are much more important.
For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.
On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.
-vpr
SWA
DAL
Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.
If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.
Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.
Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.
Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.
Now numbers that are much more important.
For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.
On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.
-vpr
You're correct in that the company is under no obligation. It could make sense to them as long as they got an extension of the amendable date and our pay increases beyond that kept us below industry standard. The argument would be to get increases now for the next two years that we would not have gotten, and in return, get paid less than what they project for pilots in 2013 and 2014.
Carl
Carl
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Kept us below industry standard??? Carl, you need to re-check your facts. You're on the 747. You're pretty much the highest paid airline pilot out there at the moment. Here are the 1/1/2011 rates for the highest paying equipment at each airline:
DAL $217
LUV $214
AMR $205
CAL $193
UAL $190
USAir $160
And here are the rates for the 737-800 at each airline:
LUV $214
DAL $175
ALA $175
CAL $169
AMR $166
AWA $142
UAL $137
USAir $125
I agree we are way below what we used to get paid, and way below what we are "worth", but we're well above industry standard for all passenger airlines. Just the facts. Hmmm, who was the MEC Chairman that made that happen?
DAL $217
LUV $214
AMR $205
CAL $193
UAL $190
USAir $160
And here are the rates for the 737-800 at each airline:
LUV $214
DAL $175
ALA $175
CAL $169
AMR $166
AWA $142
UAL $137
USAir $125
I agree we are way below what we used to get paid, and way below what we are "worth", but we're well above industry standard for all passenger airlines. Just the facts. Hmmm, who was the MEC Chairman that made that happen?

We have, what 16 747s? Southwest has 547 737s!
So all their captains (assuming they have the longevity) are paid a higher hourly rate than all of our captains except for the few on the 747 and 777.
I'm an A-320 captain. So how is my pay relative to SWA? (Hint: It's a whole lot less.)
But I'm sure you'll point out I get a raise tomorrow and the difference will be less than 50 bucks an hour. Gee, that's so close...
While you can't get exact numbers for yearly block hours these links do provide some great info.
SWA
DAL
Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.
If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.
Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.
Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.
Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.
Now numbers that are much more important.
For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.
On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.
-vpr
SWA
DAL
Down near the bottom you will find that SWA flew 2,026,134 Block Hrs for 2009 with 5634 pilots. Thats 360 Hrs/pilot x 2 for the 737 = 720 Hrs/pilot for 2009.
If you assume that 10% don't fly for various reasons the number is 800 Hrs/pilot.
Delta's numbers are much harder to extrapolate because of international ops with 3 and 4 man crews.
Delta flew 2,696,379 Blk Hrs in 2009 with 10,785 pilots. That's 250 Hrs/pilot x 2.5 (which is a wag on my part to account for 3 and 4 pilot crews) = 625 Hrs/pilots.
Again assuming 10% don't fly the number is 695 Hrs/pilot.
Now numbers that are much more important.
For 2009 the revenue per pilot at SWA and Delta were almost the same and historically trend close together.
On the other hand Delta's average pilot salary was $138,000 while SWA average was $177,000.
-vpr
Come on PG,
We have, what 16 747s? Southwest has 547 737s!
So all their captains (assuming they have the longevity) are paid a higher hourly rate than all of our captains except for the few on the 747 and 777.
I'm an A-320 captain. So how is my pay relative to SWA? (Hint: It's a whole lot less.)
We have, what 16 747s? Southwest has 547 737s!
So all their captains (assuming they have the longevity) are paid a higher hourly rate than all of our captains except for the few on the 747 and 777.
I'm an A-320 captain. So how is my pay relative to SWA? (Hint: It's a whole lot less.)
One airline (SWA) does not define "industry standard". Neither do cargo carriers.
So many people continue to bad mouth our pay, while refusing to acknowledge that, in spite of how bad it is relative to the past, we are near the top at the moment. Call them bankruptcy wages if you want, but they are almost industry leading. That's pathetic, I admit, but it is what it is, and to ignore that reality, is to live in a dreamworld.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




