Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-30-2010 | 05:09 PM
  #55551  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

For those wondering, I'm a currently a junior SWA Cappy, I sat reserve all year, averaged 64 hours per month, and made 257K for 2010. I generally picked up two xtra days of flying each month so I averaged 13 days off a month, not including days they didn't fly me on reserve. Hope this helps you guys.
Old 12-30-2010 | 05:12 PM
  #55552  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
SWA has "hubs" but not really a hub and spoke operation. Delta could never be as efficient because planes don't leave Atlanta, go to Nashville, then Salt Lake City, then LAX, and then Honolulu. The planes usually just go back to the respective hub as a turn. And I thought having 9 or 10 types of planes was an asset, so marketing could find the exact plane that was perfect for a particular route? One size doesn't always fit all. (I knew that in college)
It depends - Before the merger DAL was shooting for fleet simplicity, and more aircraft types were considered a liability. That was what they said when they parked numerous aircraft types - we need to simplify the fleet. But when management wanted to justify the merger (and their golden stock options) overnight DAL went from shooting for Fleet simplicity to Fleet versatility. Now different aircraft types were all of a sudden an asset. Go figure.

Scoop
Old 12-30-2010 | 05:27 PM
  #55553  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
Default

Not sure if anyone noticed, but it is nice to see CAL stuck to their guns and won the arbitration in regards to the SCOPE violations UAL was doing with UAX out of IAH EWR and other CAL hubs. Cease and desist on all UAX flying out of CAL hubs on jets larger than 51 seats with CO code shares.
Old 12-30-2010 | 05:36 PM
  #55554  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
Not sure if anyone noticed, but it is nice to see CAL stuck to their guns and won the arbitration in regards to the SCOPE violations UAL was doing with UAX out of IAH EWR and other CAL hubs. Cease and desist on all UAX flying out of CAL hubs on jets larger than 51 seats with CO code shares.
That's great news! But why do I get the feeling that our MEC would have given in due to fear/risk of what might happen in arbitration?
Old 12-30-2010 | 06:02 PM
  #55555  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Rumor type stuff:
Talked to a kid at 31 Flavors whose Dad knows a guy that had a long layover conversation with one of our illustrious leaders.
Interesting to say the least.

This union guy doesn't think we will make it to the amendable date without some significant contract modifications. The incoming MEC administration has been very serious about going into "listening mode"

He thinks early talks are a virtual certainty. The big question according to this guy is whether management will seek to move the amendable date in these early talks. .
Wow, I like your union contacts better than mine - Reps I know say it's been an information blackout since Moak was elected to National and the election of his hand picked successor, with no discussion with them of the above.

Don't get me wrong - I hope what you are saying is true - it just is completely different from information coming from sources who should know what is going on. I remain optimistic and agree we should go after low hanging fruit while it's still hanging.

I am a little dismayed that the control of information out of the MEC seems to be following the established Moak lines of demarcation with there being the elected Reps outside the inner circle, and certain MEC insiders whispering what the direction the MEC is taking.

Last edited by TANSTAAFL; 12-30-2010 at 06:21 PM.
Old 12-30-2010 | 06:27 PM
  #55556  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,831
Likes: 172
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by mtbguy
Maybe your airplane is different, but I've been on reserve at Delta for almost four years now- haven't you noticed that you will end up on SC or with a trip assigned?

I only end up with perhaps one long call day a month that actually stays that way and I hang out at home.

For me I'd rather have it be 15 days of SC and make another 50k a year....
Agreed. Work you while you're here and make more money and more days off. Heck I'd take 3-4 long calls and the rest short calls, as long as the pilot could pick where the long calls go (i.e. the beginning of 3-4 reserve periods). The 6 SC "limit" is an illusion because early show trips plus the 6 SC can more than make for a completely non-commutable month for a reserve. 3 extra days off is better for most. The days of senior reserves sitting at home and living in bypass land, only going to the sims every 90 days to get current are a thing of the past. Could we get that back? Sure. But its extremely expensive. Are we willing to pay for it? Doubtful.

I like the rumors of early opening for all positive gains. We would be very, very wise to watch our collective backs on that though. We shouldn't fool ourselves into thinking the company doesn't want to tack on the E190/195 to the carriers already doing E170/175 flying. And/or the Mitsubishi 100ish seater (which Trans States already ordered and is bragging about future scope relief when asked who they will fly them for). And/or the C-Series, et al.

Even keeping scope where it is would be completely unacceptable. The 76 seater as a permittable type (to be outsourced) needs to go, and serious restrictions on the 70 seater as well are in order, as contracts expire at a minimum.

Those who trade scope for pay wind up with neither.
Old 12-30-2010 | 06:54 PM
  #55557  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Wise words Gloopy. Had a nice talk today about that with a senior captain!
Old 12-30-2010 | 07:23 PM
  #55558  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Rumor type stuff:
Talked to a kid at 31 Flavors whose Dad knows a guy that had a long layover conversation with one of our illustrious leaders.
Interesting to say the least.

This union guy doesn't think we will make it to the amendable date without some significant contract modifications. The incoming MEC administration has been very serious about going into "listening mode" and they will only intensify that effort in coming months. What they have heard so far though is pretty much unmistakable. The pilot group remains incredibly motivated and has been quietly carrying an enormous load the last couple years with pretty much no complaining. We have bought into "constructive engagement" while the corporate boys rebuild their finances. But we also expect that all this sacrifice will pay off reasonably quickly now that profitability has been restored. Mention the future and its like a "seething cauldron" with the level of frustration increasing daily. No progress toward contract restoration until 2013 or later is a recipe for a disaster in pilot morale. A major catalyst for that attitude -- the notion that a ValuJet 717 driver is going to be making more than our 777 captains is an embarassment that is really hitting home with even some of the die-hard old-time Widget lovers in Peachtree City.
This "official" doesn't think management will let that toxic brew of resentment build up unabated for another two or three years. Mgmt knows the pilot group has contributed mightily to the recovery of this corporation but bad stuff will inevitably start to happen to the operational statistics if the pilots were to, let's just say, suffer a serious loss of enthusiasm. No illegal concerted activity, just 12,000 p***ed off people turning the wheels instead of 12,000 motivated people.

He thinks early talks are a virtual certainty. The big question according to this guy is whether management will seek to move the amendable date in these early talks. They could address the short-term issues with small bites of the apple just big enough to keep the lid on things until Section 6 plays out or they could open up more of the book and do some bigger things but then of course ask for an extension of the amendable date.
DALPA is preparing for either eventuality but they will be very reluctant to move the amendable date without extensive opportunity for feedback, thorough debate, roadshows, all that..
I've been hearing the same.
Old 12-30-2010 | 07:26 PM
  #55559  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by moosedawg
For those wondering, I'm a currently a junior SWA Cappy, I sat reserve all year, averaged 64 hours per month, and made 257K for 2010. I generally picked up two xtra days of flying each month so I averaged 13 days off a month, not including days they didn't fly me on reserve. Hope this helps you guys.
Thanks moosedawg. That does help.
Old 12-30-2010 | 07:33 PM
  #55560  
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
From: DAL Widebody
Default

Originally Posted by DeadHead
Those will all be scoped out by that point....
DeadHead,

For some reason, you speak with such authority when you post...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices