Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 01-09-2011 | 11:37 AM
  #56421  
nerd2009's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
From: Delta M88 A ATL
Default

IMHO ACL65pilot has always been respectful to everyone on this board. His posts are always full of good information and no abrasive.

That being said, Carl abrasiveness raises a few eyebrows.

What happened at NWA between the folks who kept their full pensions intact and the others who did not has brought out a lot of anger. Most of that was from the more junior pilots most affected, not the other way around.

nuf said!
Old 01-09-2011 | 11:39 AM
  #56422  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
So the company comes to DALPA and says. "We would like to convert 20 of our 70 seaters allowed to 76 seaters. If you agree we have a tentative order for 100 C series jets. The switch from 70 seaters will occur in a 1 for 5 ratio. For each 5 C series jets on the property and flying we get to convert 1 70 seater to a 76 seater. The overall fleet number which is currently at XXX cannot go below the current number plus the C series slots or we lose the extra 76 seaters. If C series jets are removed from the fleet we remove the 76 seats in a inverse proportion. Deliveries of the C series will start in 6 months and we will post a bid next week.
Would you say no???
Why would anyone need that deal? Is it in our long term strategic interest to outsource more flying to a jet with better operating economics than a MD88? Would there be more Delta pilots hired with, or without that deal? What makes D-ALPA more powerful by representing the most pilots? Does management really need that relief to by an airplane? Why do pilots have to buy airplanes through scope concessions? Seems counter intuitive to me.

I would try to educate myself of the deal. If my initial response turned out to be correct, I would poll my Reps. If any of them sounded like they were even going to consider it, I would try to convince them not to and ask for their commitment. If I was unpersuasive, I would launch a recall and try to get them out of office before they had a chance to vote on outsourcing more Delta flying. I would ask friends in other Councils to do the same.

No more outsourcing, not one more seat, not one more pound. Delta can operate these airplanes with Delta pilots. We have at least 300 guys already typed on that equipment. No more scope deals, unless it recovers Delta jobs to Delta Air Lines. We'll take flying back. No more sales.

Of course, most scope deals are done in the dark. Politicians are pretty good at hiding these acts of legerdemain until it is a fait accompli. But, Delta pilots have their sources too. Delta hires leaders. As Delta hires more pilots who are experienced in the ways of outsourcing the level of political activism will rise. Eventually they will get their hands on the tiller and ALPA will take a swerve for the right, towards a more conservative union which focuses on its representational foundation.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-09-2011 at 12:03 PM.
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:01 PM
  #56423  
nwaf16dude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,890
Likes: 0
From: 737A
Default

Does anyone have any updated information about the Jan AE? Like maybe why was it delayed?
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:05 PM
  #56424  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Hawaii50
ACL, Carl has an agenda and you're on the other side so you're a target. I, never in a million years, read from your posts that you hate senior guys. I wouldn't waste my time trying to reason if I were you. I'd rather see your opinions and your usual informative posts then you trying to repel attacks from a red book whale guy. Take care.
I engage him, just like I engage others. He is a Delta pilot, and has an opinion. I disagree with a great many things he says, but at least he is being honest. I do think he has his anger directed in the wrong direction, but again, that is his choice. The reality is that there are probably more pilots than just ole Carl that feel this way. That is why a dialogue is needed. I can take the slams event though I feel they are unwarranted. (Notice I let the other mods moderate him)

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
Actually the number of DALN pilots with significant frozen pensions is quite small, however the number of pilots staying past 60 is bordering 75%, mainly because of our industry trailing, cobra priced retiree medical and staying until they can get medicare. So yes, it is your junior pilot @ss interest for them to get better medical and move on. Right now back of the napkin mean retirement is 62-63. I'm sure you don't mind delaying that upgrade another 3 years just so you can show those greedy senior guys.
I would like to see better retirement insurance for anyone that wants to leave. I would also like to see it at least 50% covered until medicare kicks in. It is something they deserve, but also it makes them have a connection to the company after they no longer fly here. It makes them vested in our success as an airline and a pilot group.

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
A senior / junior divide is counterproductive. Both need each other to achieve success in contract negotiations. Carl's understanding and support for better scope is very much appreciated by the junior guys on this board.

By the same token, I know what ACL is referring to because I've heard the same things he his hearing from his mostly DAL-S Captains who have enjoyed the seniority to avoid the worst of the last decade and who also enjoy the luxury of tuning most of this crap out.

This board is like monitoring HF. There is a good bit of static along with useful information. For junior guys who's QOL is effected by a single airplane's staffing, it is well worth following every ride report. For the Senior guys, there is only a few things that will make the HF go DING that rises to their attention.

ACL is probably telling them a lot they were never motivated enough to dig up on their own. When the going got real tough, the tough retired early and our current Senior pilots upgraded to maintain level earnings. Not saying they did not take cuts like everyone else, but they had earned the seniority to side step the ugliest effects of mismanagement.

Now with PBS and computer scheduling the difference between senior and junior is STARK! Senior guys get the very best and junior guys get the very worst. It is easy to draw a line that divides us. We can not let that happen.
Well said.

Originally Posted by nerd2009
IMHO ACL65pilot has always been respectful to everyone on this board. His posts are always full of good information and no abrasive.

That being said, Carl abrasiveness raises a few eyebrows.

What happened at NWA between the folks who kept their full pensions intact and the others who did not has brought out a lot of anger. Most of that was from the more junior pilots most affected, not the other way around.

nuf said!
True, I have listened to many pilots from teh PMNW side state that. It seems the pensions of a few were saved. The past is the past though. We all need to worry about what is in front of us.
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:05 PM
  #56425  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: The Flying Wasp
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
IMHO ACL65pilot has always been respectful to everyone on this board. His posts are always full of good information and no abrasive.

That being said, Carl abrasiveness raises a few eyebrows.

What happened at NWA between the folks who kept their full pensions intact and the others who did not has brought out a lot of anger. Most of that was from the more junior pilots most affected, not the other way around.

nuf said!

Agreed 100 %
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:06 PM
  #56426  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
Does anyone have any updated information about the Jan AE? Like maybe why was it delayed?

The only thing the CPO said was it was delayed. No release date. It was inferred there were some last minute changes. (IROP too)
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:06 PM
  #56427  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Why would anyone need that deal? Is it in our long term strategic interest to outsource more flying to a jet with better operating economics than a MD88? Would there be more Delta pilots hired with, or without that deal? What makes D-ALPA more powerful by representing the most pilots? Does management really need that relief to by an airplane? Why do pilots have to buy airplanes through scope concessions? Seems counter intuitive to me.

I would try to educate myself of the deal. If my initial response turned out to be correct, I would poll my Reps. If any of them sounded like they were even going to consider it, I would try to convince them not to and ask for their commitment. If I was unpersuasive, I would launch a recall and try to get them out of office before they had a chance to vote on outsourcing more Delta flying. I would ask friends in other Councils to do the same.

No more outsourcing, not one more seat, not one more pound. Delta can operate these airplanes with Delta pilots. We have at least 300 guys already typed on that equipment. No more scope deals, unless it recovers Delta jobs to Delta Air Lines. We'll take flying back. No more sales.

Of course, most scope deals are done in the dark. Politicians are pretty good at hiding these acts of legerdemain until it is a fait accompli. But, Delta pilots have their sources too. Delta hires leaders. As Delta hires more pilots who are experienced in the ways of outsourcing the level of political activism will rise. Eventually they will get their hands on the tiller and ALPA will take a swerve for the right, towards a more conservative union which focuses on its representational foundation.
+1

Well said.
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:43 PM
  #56428  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
FTB, how come you never posted the picture of the girl in the hat?

All I can say is War Eag... No, I just can't say it. But I hope you win.

I'll be here in ATL, alone in my hotel, watching the game on a low def small screen tv... hint hint
Old 01-09-2011 | 12:58 PM
  #56429  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by TANSTAAFL
Actually the number of DALN pilots with significant frozen pensions is quite small, however the number of pilots staying past 60 is bordering 75%, mainly because of our industry trailing, cobra priced retiree medical and staying until they can get medicare. So yes, it is your junior pilot @ss interest for them to get better medical and move on. Right now back of the napkin mean retirement is 62-63. I'm sure you don't mind delaying that upgrade another 3 years just so you can show those greedy senior guys.
Standard question though: What are you willing to pay to (theoretically) get those guys to pull the handles? And.... and this is a really big aaaaaand.... what guarantee do we have that if we get them some kind of medical bridge that they actually WILL pull the handles... Answer: none. There is no guarantee, so I for one don't want to spend squat to get them a better deal.
Old 01-09-2011 | 01:20 PM
  #56430  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by nerd2009
IMHO ACL65pilot has always been respectful to everyone on this board. His posts are always full of good information and no abrasive.

That being said, Carl abrasiveness raises a few eyebrows.

What happened at NWA between the folks who kept their full pensions intact and the others who did not has brought out a lot of anger. Most of that was from the more junior pilots most affected, not the other way around.

nuf said!
Who kept their full pensions intact? None that I know of. Management must love the senior/junior discourse, they have the perfect whipsaw going.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices