Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:47 PM
  #57361  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The total block hours flown on average in 2001 were the same as the block hours flown in June of 2007 pre merger. You would expect that would yield the same number of pilots. Sadly it did not. We were flying the 07 schedule with 2500 fewer line pilots. Down from 10,000 to 7500. That was a direct result of a hundred or more work rule changes to increase productivity. Those jobs lost are equally spread across the fleet spectrum from 777 CA to MD88 FO.

You keep making this argument.... while it is valid, it's ridiculous and making you look the same. So mainline flew the same amount of block hours in 2001 as 2007? Neat. How much TOTAL (Delta branded) block hours were done in comparison?

Think about how many more pilot jobs we would have had such a massive % of our domestic flying not been outsourced ?
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:50 PM
  #57362  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You keep making this argument.... while it is valid, it's ridiculous and making you look the same. So mainline flew the same amount of block hours in 2001 as 2007? Neat. How much TOTAL (Delta branded) block hours were done in comparison?

Think about how many more pilot jobs we would have had such a massive % of our domestic flying not been outsourced ?
That's an excellent point, 80!
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:51 PM
  #57363  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
There are however pilots on here who can't post a single good thing about working at Delta airlines.

Jobs have been lost to outsourcing but far more and better jobs were lost to work rule changes yet most seem to want to ignore that because they personally want to fly as much as possible.
(1) Think you are observing pilots who came to Delta from regional carriers who had expectations that life on reserve at Delta would be better than life on reserve at a "regional." The fact that the Delta contract is substandard to regional contracts negotiated in the late 1990's is part of the reason for the kibitzing. Objectively, the 24 hour international reserve, lack of premium pay, lack of daily credit for short call, and low reserve guarantee are (were) better at our DCI carriers (and also characteristics of domestic flying in a limited route network as opposed to global operations). The f-NWA also have some pretty good reasons for pining their old contract, while forgetting some of the real improvements they've seen. Rose colored glasses are human nature.

(2) Most thinking Delta pilots would like an affirmative statement from their MEC expressing the opinion that ALL DELTA JOBS ARE VALUABLE. The concept that some jobs are better than others leads to negotiations which inevitably place the representation of one pilot superior to the representation of another pilot who is inferior. As a union, ALPA has a duty to treat all of its members equally.

I know what you were getting at, but we need to stop seeing a DC9 FO as different than a 747 Captain. Every Delta job is important. Every Delta pilot represented gives our MEC the same power and leverage at the bargaining table. The slice of the pie we represent is our relevance.

----

Despite the complaining, not many pilots are leaving Delta. It is a good place to work. Like you, every one here is motivated to make it better. Sitting near the coaches it might sound like we guys in the cheap seats are complaining, but believe me, there is no better game in town to have a seat at. Certainly I appreciate the work every one does, but continuous improvement means never settling.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-18-2011 at 07:03 PM.
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:55 PM
  #57364  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

80, DCI employs about 6K pilots.
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:56 PM
  #57365  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
That's an excellent point, 80!
I remember BK and others huffing and puffing that same diatribe he just posted... while I'm sitting there back in the back thinking exactly what I just posted. Although, I was so taken aback at them justifying what happened instead of coming up with any sort of a fix to the problem that there really wasn't much to say.

They wonder why I don't consider those with that point of view relevant...
Old 01-18-2011 | 05:59 PM
  #57366  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The total block hours flown on average in 2001 were the same as the block hours flown in June of 2007 pre merger. You would expect that would yield the same number of pilots. Sadly it did not. We were flying the 07 schedule with 2500 fewer line pilots. Down from 10,000 to 7500. That was a direct result of a hundred or more work rule changes to increase productivity. Those jobs lost are equally spread across the fleet spectrum from 777 CA to MD88 FO.
Good post.
Old 01-18-2011 | 06:00 PM
  #57367  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
80, DCI employs about 6K pilots.

And think about how many jobs that would be without being under slave workrules...


Of course the economics of it would probably even out the number of pilots as some of the borderline viable small cities would no longer be serviced or frequency would be reduced.

Regardless, that would take us from 12500 pilots to 18500 pilots.
Old 01-18-2011 | 06:15 PM
  #57368  
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
At home on the maddog!
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
80, DCI employs about 6K pilots.
How many did they employ in 2001?
Old 01-18-2011 | 06:19 PM
  #57369  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
How many did they employ in 2001?
Think the number was around 2,400.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-18-2011 at 06:29 PM.
Old 01-18-2011 | 06:46 PM
  #57370  
buzzpat's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,070
Likes: 1
From: Urban chicken rancher.
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
I highly recommend the C-141. Even it's shadow seems to provide for some pretty good times.
I was hoping for a C-141 Berlin base on this latest AE. MB I could have held a line again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices