Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:30 PM
  #56361  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
It's going on as we speak...

There are many "scope" issues well beyond the RJs.
Take a look at Section 1 of our PWA and compare the AF JV, the old CAL, the RJ and the AS section.
  • Our JV with AF is a great example of how to manage scope well and correctly with the ratio of ASMs set at 50% and reviewed annually.
  • Our old CAL section had good provisions protecting ETOPs flying to the islands with similar percentages.
  • Even the RJ section has ratios of flying set up with RJs required to fly to hubs from outsations and hub-tohub flying by RJs limited to 6%.
  • Now look at the AS section the only limit is 25% of hub-to-hub flying and the 86-seat cap on codeshare. There are no Island-flying protections because the authors didn't picture AS doing ETOPs flying the way the CAL provisions were written.
Guess what, we just cancelled HNL flying from a bunch of our hubs with AS picking up he route often a day later...
  • Should AS buy HA our current Section 1 would permit AS A330 flying HNL-NRT with the DL code.
  • Looking over the fence UAL and Air Lingus are looking at setting up a JV to fly MAD-IAD with off seniority-list pilots.
  • BA set up "Open Skies" to fly CDG-JFK with jets pulled from the BA fleet and staffed with new-hire pilots.
If you believe "scope" is an issue that requires nothing more than cursory attention you are seriously kidding yourself and need to take a look around in this industry on a global level...
We are not immune from these challenges, in fact should we succeed with our pay-restoration efforts - and I hope we do - we make the business case that much more compelling for outsourcing DL flying to non-Delta pilots.

If it is indeed such a "non-issue" just add the few words to the DALPA mission statement that direct the MEC to expand and protect the extent of Delta flying performed by Delta pilots.

Cheers
George

Links:
ba-pilots-prepared-strike-openskies-threatens

pilots-wary-of-proposed-united-airlines

Delta cancels PDX HNL

Delta cancels MSP HNL
Great post as usual. The AS codeshare looks especially painful for those of us in LA. Pretty stagnant down here. How has it really affected the operation? SEA? Seems to have grown quite a bit but I'm not smart enough to tell, that's for sure. It's definitely a complex subject but in regards to outsourcing larger/more jets to DCI I think we're past the point of discussion.
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:33 PM
  #56362  
Hawaii50's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,325
Likes: 9
From: 3fidy
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Here is a prediction. There will be no real battle over relaxing scope in this contract. It wont even become a major issue. The fight will be to try and regain the EMB170/175 flying. If the EFA team can produce the numbers to show we can fly that flying at a reasonable cost compared to DCI it should be a all out war on our part.
I think you're right on that prediction. I rather see us focusing on ways to bring 170/175 and other 76 seat flying back instead of sowing fear about more outsourcing.
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:34 PM
  #56363  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Ferd149
....................
Wow dude, that's the most vulgarity I've ever seen in a single post. Wow. Oh wait, you erase it...



Just teasing.

Quick question because I'm looking through the contract on this one. My friend not thinking answered the phone call from scheduling in which they offered a GS but is unable to do it but scheduling demanded and he was unable to give a "contractual reason" as to why. They said call the CPO.

I'm researching this while everyone sleeps in my house. I've gone through the PWA and WSC's but just trying to
figure out if it's a proffer or not...

[update] found my answer in the when scheduling calls...
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:41 PM
  #56364  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Wow dude, that's the most vulgarity I've ever seen in a single post. Wow. Oh wait, you erase it...



Just teasing.

Quick question because I'm looking through the contract on this one. My friend not thinking answered the phone call from scheduling in which they offered a GS but is unable to do it but scheduling demanded and he was unable to give a "contractual reason" as to why. They said call the CPO.

I'm researching this while everyone sleeps in my house. I've gone through the PWA and WSC's but just trying to
figure out if it's a proffer or not...

[update] found my answer in the when scheduling calls...
So what's the answer? Inquiring minds want to know!

BTW, commuted home Friday with a bunch of Orange clad people from Alabama. Told them "Roll Tide, hope you guys win for the Glory of the Great State of Alabama!" just like the commercial. Seems Orbitz had the cheapest way to Phoenix as Delta to SAT and USA express to Sky Harbor.
Old 01-08-2011 | 05:47 PM
  #56365  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

From When Scheduling Calls & You Poop Your Pants

What If I Do Answer the Phone on an Off Day?
A pilot’s obligation to accept a trip on X-days or regular line off days is
not absolute, whether the trip is the result of a White Slip (same day or
next day), Yellow Slip, Green Slip, or Inverse Assignment. A variety of
circumstances might make accepting such a trip impossible. For example:
-Not being physically located so as to be able to report.
-Having consumed alcohol.
-Lack of available child care.
-Lack of available transportation.
--Not being adequately rested. For example:A pilot, not on call, notifi ed late at night of an immediate report should consider if he is suffi ciently rested to accept such an
assignment.A pilot is not required to accept an inverse assignment that requires a commute that would prevent adequate rest for the
assigned trip.

Be polite but be insistent. If necessary, call your Chief Pilot.


I won't give more details but I'd like too but I think I'd give my buddy an ulcer.
Old 01-08-2011 | 06:01 PM
  #56366  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
BTW, commuted home Friday with a bunch of Orange clad people from Alabama. Told them "Roll Tide, hope you guys win for the Glory of the Great State of Alabama!" just like the commercial. Seems Orbitz had the cheapest way to Phoenix as Delta to SAT and USA express to Sky Harbor.
Classy thing to say Satch.

Like I said, it's incredible that two schools from the same state both went undefeated, won the SEC, won the Heisman and could... hopefully for my side... both be national champs.

Now back to my pregame position:

Old 01-08-2011 | 06:07 PM
  #56367  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Just as a friendly reminder neither Southwest or the old AirTran have regional jets whether it is a 50 seater, 70 or 76... so my thought, SDF-ATL and LEX-ATL becomes SDF-LEX-ATL in an MD88... kill the RJ industry without having to negotiate a thing.


no idea what the math comes out to be

Actually Skywest operates several CRJ200's on an 'at risk' contract as AirTran Connect.
Old 01-08-2011 | 06:09 PM
  #56368  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
So the company comes to DALPA and says. "We would like to convert 20 of our 70 seaters allowed to 76 seaters. If you agree we have a tentative order for 100 C series jets. The switch from 70 seaters will occur in a 1 for 5 ratio. For each 5 C series jets on the property and flying we get to convert 1 70 seater to a 76 seater. The overall fleet number which is currently at XXX cannot go below the current number plus the C series slots or we lose the extra 76 seaters. If C series jets are removed from the fleet we remove the 76 seats in a inverse proportion. Deliveries of the C series will start in 6 months and we will post a bid next week.
Would you say no???
Absolutely No FREAKING WAY!!!!!!!
Old 01-08-2011 | 06:15 PM
  #56369  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

My day just got a lot easier tomorrow due to 'pro-active' cancellations in ATL.
Old 01-08-2011 | 06:18 PM
  #56370  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
My day just got a lot easier tomorrow due to 'pro-active' cancellations in ATL.
basically from what I can tell they cancel everything but the hub-to-hub and international stuff and then reroute passengers out of ATL.

Snow is in the forecast not only this weekend and early week but again at the end of the week. $$$$$$$$
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices