![]() |
When I ordered by 75/76 books a month ago, they didn't even send me Jepps since they're in the jets. I feel slighted, but only slightly.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 944050)
Specious and argumentative question. Both NWA and DAL pilots "owned" the flying that they brought in the merger through scope. We don't "own" the flying currently being subcontracted.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 944050)
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 944050)
Longevity is not a reason not to pursue unity. History tells us longevity has not been a problem when management, or ALPA, wanted a merger.
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 944050)
To pre-empt your reply that management does not want a merger ... there are numerous answers and possibilities:
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 944050)
Everything is a negotiation. My quest for an objective economic analysis is to learn as best we can where the point is hat management would want to use Delta pilots to perform Delta flying. Then the membership has a choice to make.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 943949)
Any 757/767 guys have any input on how the ship sets are working out? I fly on Friday, and was wondering if I need a backup..
They are great. We got on our 767 to find three full sets, and an alternate kit as well. It will take a little time to get used to them, but they are awesome. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 944123)
Specious and argumentative question. Both NWA and DAL pilots "owned" the flying that they brought in the merger through scope. We don't "own" the flying currently being subcontracted.
"Specious and argumentative". That disappoints me. Specious="misleading in appearance". I fail to see that quality to Bar's comments. Argumentative: certainly, the whole premise is to have constructive, diverse and potentially contrarian arguments to endeavor others to think about all aspects of a problem and formulate a cogent strategy. Again, you are tossing out emotional trigger words that serve only to inflame and entrench an opposing view.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 944123)
Yup, it is a negotiation. There are two parties to that negotiation. As I've said before, the analysis has been done. You can probably do some of your own just based on labor costs from Form 41 data. As to the ASA's get our pseudo-lawyer CheckEssential to go back to the bankruptcy era and search if any of the bankrupt carriers ASA's were ever made public. I don't know, but doubt they were as that is highly sensitive competitive data. Most of that was redacted from the bankruptcy record at least in Delta's case. In other words, unless you get a job with ALPA E&FA, you're probably not going to see them...;)
Nobody says we are guaranteed to like the answer, nor can we expect ALPA to divulge confidential information. What we can expect is to hear the leadership say something along the lines of:
Originally Posted by DALPA MEC
"We hear you, we understand you don't like it. We will update the analysis of current excepted flying to determine the potential costs and benefits. ALPA made mistakes in the past by "selling" our flying. We realize that we are barely the majority of pilots in the network flying Delta passengers on Delta tickets in Delta liveried aircraft. We will not sell out any pilot job senior or junior any more, and we will do our best to regain and enhance our standing within the Delta Air Line network."
|
And the total cost once determined, can then be broken down into how much everything would cost, just 51 seats and up, the 70 seaters or just the 76 seaters. I doubt bringing the 76 seaters to the mainline would break the bank. We can at least afford that, since it is the primary DC-9 replacement aircraft so far (and even if the MD90's come on line as promised, there is no reason to outsource a 76 seat dual class jet anyway).
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 944137)
They are great. We got on our 767 to find three full sets, and an alternate kit as well. It will take a little time to get used to them, but they are awesome.
|
FYI...the going rate for Jepp binders on eBay seems to range anywhere from $10 to $75.
Sell early and often. :p |
Slow, it is a very truthful question when you consider ASA did have its own code, was bought, stripped of its code and its pilots had to apply and get hired with a complete loss of longevity and seniority. The Northwest merger is an interesting contrast. The only people with the right to be angry about that are ACL and his ilk. ACL65, amigo, if I upset you by the example, I apologize.
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 944123)
We don't "own" the flying currently being subcontracted.
The ugly truth is that we (our MEC and Management) want that flying done as cheaply as possible. In concept, the net cost savings is used to cross collateralize our pay. We still make legal claim to control of that flying. If we have in fact lost control of our scope, yours is the first admission I've heard. I find it highly alarming!
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 944123)
... your story is incomplete and inaccurate. Delta took over ramp services for all DCI in ATL. Note that they didn't take a whole host of ASA ground employees from outstations, pilots or flight attendants. So it wasn't just pilots. The PanAm acquisition of certain assets comes to mind in the way ASA employees that came to Delta were treated.
Delta & ALPA owe nobody anything if we simply cancel our contracts for outsourced work. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 944123)
As I've said before, the analysis has been done. You can probably do some of your own just based on labor costs from Form 41 data. As to the ASA's get our pseudo-lawyer CheckEssential to go back to the bankruptcy era and search if any of the bankrupt carriers ASA's were ever made public. I don't know, but doubt they were as that is highly sensitive competitive data. Most of that was redacted from the bankruptcy record at least in Delta's case. In other words, unless you get a job with ALPA E&FA, you're probably not going to see them...;)
I would suggest any member in good standing who is curious, ask the question next time you see your Rep, or a member of our MEC Administration. ACL65, care to post the confirmation? |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 944149)
And the total cost once determined, can then be broken down into how much everything would cost, just 51 seats and up, the 70 seaters or just the 76 seaters. I doubt bringing the 76 seaters to the mainline would break the bank. We can at least afford that, since it is the primary DC-9 replacement aircraft so far (and even if the MD90's come on line as promised, there is no reason to outsource a 76 seat dual class jet anyway).
What concerns me about these new contracts, is that we are signing up for long term deals which tap our revenue at the roots. THis harms our future competitiveness and flexibility. What really concerns me is that we lose control over that capacity. If fuel prices head to $200bbl again the only capacity management can park in a hurry is small jets at mainline. The MD88 is a prime target since its costs per seat mile are higher than other alternatives. Our junior pilots are the accumulator in the system. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:33 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands