![]() |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 973178)
Glad to know it's working well for you, hoser. You mean you don't lay awake at night worrying about what would happen if you left your account up on your computer, and the cat walked across the keyboard and accidentally sold your stock at the wrong time? :eek:
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 973173)
Sigh...
That's not the objective of this method. Yes, it is designed so that you never sell stock for a loss. But it is NOT designed to make much on the sale of the stock when you do sell it. You do generally make some capital appreciation. But the vast majority of the return comes from the cash flow that is generated while you own the stock. Have I mentioned that is the objective? ;) Yes, the method screens for stocks that are good candidates for generating cash flow and are not likely to go bankrupt. There is no attempt being made to predict whether a stock is going to go up or down over any particular time frame. Maybe we need to get our own thread to discuss this over in the "Money" section? In all seriousness, I know nothing about investing. I just ragging on this method a little bit. $2500 seems like a lot for a two day workshop. It really does seem like one of those TV ads. On a different note, I had a friend give me a bottle of Mona Vie. That stuff tastes horrible. I would rather drink 2 oz of scotch twice a day. According to wikipedia, the health benefits might be about the same. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 973173)
Sigh...
That's not the objective of this method. Yes, it is designed so that you never sell stock for a loss. But it is NOT designed to make much on the sale of the stock when you do sell it. You do generally make some capital appreciation. But the vast majority of the return comes from the cash flow that is generated while you own the stock. Have I mentioned that is the objective? ;) Yes, the method screens for stocks that are good candidates for generating cash flow and are not likely to go bankrupt. There is no attempt being made to predict whether a stock is going to go up or down over any particular time frame. Maybe we need to get our own thread to discuss this over in the "Money" section? I think the fact that you followers have spent 5 pages and 10 hours defending the "Snider Method" confirms to me that it's all BS. If I learned the holy Grail to investing (that cost me $2500 to obtain) I certainly wouldn't be trying to sell people on it. I'd quietly be sitting back and watching myself get rich. I'll stick to the old fashion - Warren Buffet method of investing, I.e., P/E ratio and lots and lots of research. |
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 973193)
What is cash flow while you own the stock? Dividends? So buy good stocks with dividends? Got it.
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 973193)
In all seriousness, I know nothing about investing. I just ragging on this method a little bit. $2500 seems like a lot for a two day workshop. It really does seem like one of those TV ads.
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 973193)
On a different note, I had a friend give me a bottle of Mona Vie. That stuff tastes horrible. I would rather drink 2 oz of scotch twice a day. According to wikipedia, the health benefits might be about the same.
|
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
(Post 973128)
This extra per diem comment is sad. This is not a regional airline. We need to make enough money that my fellow pilot Brocc can afford to go the movies, buy himself a nice dinner, or hire a prostitute while sitting at his crashpad. He's trying to pick up a trip to get the per diem. It's pathetic that it has come down to this at a major carrier. We should be ashamed of ourselves. It's time to get rid of this bankruptcy contract. It's also time to stop the damn outsourcing.
|
Originally Posted by Ed Harley
(Post 973202)
I think the fact that you followers have spent 5 pages and 10 hours defending the "Snider Method" confirms to me that it's all BS. If I learned the holy Grail to investing (that cost me $2500 to obtain) I certainly wouldn't be trying to sell people on it. I'd quietly be sitting back and watching myself get rich.
I'll stick to the old fashion - Warren Buffet method of investing, I.e., P/E ratio and lots and lots of research. Good luck. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 973206)
Well that's what I get for trying to be helpful. :rolleyes:
Good luck. |
from a Morningstar forum:
e: What is with the Kim Snider Methodology? 03-04-2011, 11:20 PM | Post #3006856 My wife and I went through her course in December 2006 and paid aprox. $5000. We decided that since we were both about to retire we needed extra money to supplement our income. We decided to let $500,000.00 of our retirement money to be managed by the Kim Snider Method in the early part of 2007. We let Kim Snider and her staff manage the account. Kim and her Husband Jim stressed to us that this method is equal or better than an investment grade bond. On November 23, 2008 the account value was exactly $131,010.31 using the Kim Snider Method. They also margined $92,169.02 in that account. You be the judge? |
I just stumbled across this! Hilarious and some very good points!
YouTube - DPA Pilot Lounge Chat Part 1 |
Originally Posted by Carl Spakler
(Post 973225)
I just stumbled across this! Hilarious and some very good points!
YouTube - DPA Pilot Lounge Chat Part 1 dpa - double penetration n a$$:eek::eek::D very funny |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands