![]() |
Does Tsquare mean terminator 2 or does it mean a t shaped thing that makes it easy to draw right angles or does it mean twin turbo or does it mean you stutter when you say T?
|
Originally Posted by chuck416
(Post 999573)
^^^+1^^^
We are/were hired as pilots. They are hired as managers. Reasonable accommodations(s) for unusual circumstances? Absolutely. But 40% pay-cuts, in addition to termination of pensions in the name of said "reasonable accommodations"? Absolutely not. Even if we go to C2K wages, that is a huge windfall for management's bottom line when you figure no more pensions to pay for. I'm not advocating sticking your head in the sand... Chuck |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 999547)
BS to infinity on the bolded print!
GO TO COURT!!!!!:mad: You can't go to court. The RLA forces you to go through the contractual grievance process. Since the use of holding companies is not new and we did not in the past with this same issue file a grievance the chances of winning are zero. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 999649)
You can't go to court. The RLA forces you to go through the contractual grievance process. Since the use of holding companies is not new and we did not in the past with this same issue file a grievance the chances of winning are zero.
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 999542)
Speaking of RAH. I just received a newsletter today from council 74, which included this gem:
__________________________________________________ ____ Republic Air Holdings (RAH) Scope Issue This is obviously a contentious issue for a majority of our pilots. During the MEC meeting, we had a very detailed briefing from our DALPA legal staff that explained the current scope language and how holding companies, such as RAH, fit into that language. A vigorous debate took place both in Delegate Committee and in plenary session. We accept the fact that RAH, as it is currently structured, does not violate the scope language in the PWA as currently written. But we also feel that we need to consider how we construct future language to protect the interests of Delta pilots. Therefore, we amended our resolution to focus our attention on how we protect ourselves in the future. Also take a look at Resolution 11-95, which directs the MEC administration to do a financial analysis of flying done under the Delta brand. We all feel strongly that we must take a proactive approach to this issue. We appreciate and encourage your input. _________________________________________ For those of you expecting big raises next contract, don't count on it. The head of ALPA National himself put out a letter around Christmas time telling us that our pay has been restored to pre-bankruptcy levels. He left out the gem that the Delta pilots took TWO VOLUNTARY CONCESSIONS before the big bankruptcy hit. He also left out the fact that your work rules and pensions were obliterated (this was prior to me working at Delta). He was just comparing hourly rates. If the head of ALPA National thinks our restoration is complete and puts it in writing, what do you think the chances of us actually getting anything significant is? ALPA cannot be fixed. It is a corrupt organization that needs shut down and rebuilt from scratch. |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 999542)
Speaking of RAH. I just received a newsletter today from council 74, which included this gem:
__________________________________________________ ____ We accept the fact that RAH, as it is currently structured, does not violate the scope language in the PWA as currently written. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 999635)
Does Tsquare mean terminator 2 or does it mean a t shaped thing that makes it easy to draw right angles or does it mean twin turbo or does it mean you stutter when you say T?
I do architecture in my other life - buildings, not systems or computers |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 999572)
This is a serious question and not flame bait. Your plan is essentially the plan followed by the APA at American.
Our plan should be C2K restoration - which would cost approximately 850 million per year...despite apologists like yourself stating it would cost 3 billion, 4 billion, 5 billion, 6 billion, etc. 850 million is easily afforded by this massive and profitable company. A fare increase of just a few dollars per ticket would make up our C2K pay restoration, AND allow the company to keep its current net margins. That SHOULD be our plan...but it is NOT. ALPA/DALPA does not want that. You don't want that because ALPA/DALPA doesn't want that. But instead of simply admitting you're too weak to even ask for restoration, you invoke APA's experience with the NMB to try and weaken the resolve of Delta pilots. Weaken their resolve to your level that is. Carl |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 999649)
You can't go to court. The RLA forces you to go through the contractual grievance process. Since the use of holding companies is not new and we did not in the past with this same issue file a grievance the chances of winning are zero.
1) What grievance are you talking about? Filing one saying what? 2) When it comes to RAH I'm curious what you would like to see happen? 3) Are you trying to foretell what ALPA legal counsel and the MEC are going to say about the various issues involved with the legal definition of an "air carrier"? |
Originally Posted by Phuz
(Post 999657)
Way to go Deltoids.. Keep raising your nose and looking the other way when you see regional pilots - you guys are just that badass.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:43 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands