Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Geeze....
Has anyone gotten this "ms removal tool" virus?
I've been dealing with this crap all day.
Has anyone gotten this "ms removal tool" virus?
I've been dealing with this crap all day.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 758
I think it took a download from bleepingcomputer.com to finish it off.
I hope.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Growth will come only when the airline can profitably add flying to the system. The industry and Delta in particular is not interested in mindless market share wars just to say they have the most market share. So the only way to encourage the airline to grow is to create the business environment for them to succeed and add more flying.
I know there are some who think that if we just rid ourselves of code shares and JV's that we will somehow organically grow by leaps and bounds. AMR has been slow to the mark, somewhat hindered by their pilots, to embrace the new reality. They have the weakest alliances and the weakest market penetration (except for US Air, but they are not a factor). They have lost mainline market share, their pilot group has shrunk dramatically and they have hundreds on furlough.
As Delta has strengthened their code shares and joint ventures, we have added mainline capacity faster than any other carrier. We are still in the middle of a slow recovery from a deep recession coupled with a dramatic rise in fuel prices. Yet Delta is able to continue to fly markets profitably, continues to decrease connection flying, and according to management, they will make a profit this year. This is due in no small part to Delta's leading role in establishing a broad alliance amongst many carriers that allow them to steal profitable flying from other carriers.
So the two concepts go hand in hand. Alliances help create profitable flying, alliances help build market volume which shifts flying from RJ's to mainline aircraft, and alliances will help the company and the pilot group to grow. When the economy recovers, then we will see the growth, until then it will be slow.
I can see the urge to go tribal and try to build a moat around us and hope that leads to prosperity. In today's industry that is a recipe for failure.
I hope that answers your questions.
I know there are some who think that if we just rid ourselves of code shares and JV's that we will somehow organically grow by leaps and bounds. AMR has been slow to the mark, somewhat hindered by their pilots, to embrace the new reality. They have the weakest alliances and the weakest market penetration (except for US Air, but they are not a factor). They have lost mainline market share, their pilot group has shrunk dramatically and they have hundreds on furlough.
As Delta has strengthened their code shares and joint ventures, we have added mainline capacity faster than any other carrier. We are still in the middle of a slow recovery from a deep recession coupled with a dramatic rise in fuel prices. Yet Delta is able to continue to fly markets profitably, continues to decrease connection flying, and according to management, they will make a profit this year. This is due in no small part to Delta's leading role in establishing a broad alliance amongst many carriers that allow them to steal profitable flying from other carriers.
So the two concepts go hand in hand. Alliances help create profitable flying, alliances help build market volume which shifts flying from RJ's to mainline aircraft, and alliances will help the company and the pilot group to grow. When the economy recovers, then we will see the growth, until then it will be slow.
I can see the urge to go tribal and try to build a moat around us and hope that leads to prosperity. In today's industry that is a recipe for failure.
I hope that answers your questions.
I've been over our Section 1 with a fine tooth comb and it's not all bad.
In particular our AF JV language is solid and I hope it will form the foundation of any future additions to our Section 1.
I'd also like to see the more liberal parts of our section 1, brought up to at least a level where they are:
- Quantified at a certain level and track mainline growth at a fixed percentage cap
- Subject to an annual review
- Specific language as is in the AF JV part of Section 1 that spells out what must happen if the percentage exeeds the permitted amount.
That's why I ask the questions, because I think we all tend to get wrapped up in current minutia and tend not to look downrange.
Cheers
George
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Growth will come only when the airline can profitably add flying to the system.... the only way to encourage the airline to grow is to create the business environment for them to succeed and add more flying.
I know there are some who think that if we just rid ourselves of code shares and JV's that we will somehow organically grow by leaps and bounds. ...
As Delta has strengthened their code shares and joint ventures, we have added mainline capacity faster than any other carrier.
So the two concepts go hand in hand. Alliances help create profitable flying, alliances help build market volume which shifts flying from RJ's to mainline aircraft, and alliances will help the company and the pilot group to grow. When the economy recovers, then we will see the growth, until then it will be slow.
I know there are some who think that if we just rid ourselves of code shares and JV's that we will somehow organically grow by leaps and bounds. ...
As Delta has strengthened their code shares and joint ventures, we have added mainline capacity faster than any other carrier.
So the two concepts go hand in hand. Alliances help create profitable flying, alliances help build market volume which shifts flying from RJ's to mainline aircraft, and alliances will help the company and the pilot group to grow. When the economy recovers, then we will see the growth, until then it will be slow.
Alaska Airlines was the fastest growing in our peer group last year. Virgin and the other pozi growth operators all grew faster, although I don't blame you for not including them.
Originally Posted by Bill Ayer, Alaska Air CEO
The good results prompted the airline to announce growth plans for 2012 and beyond, and Mr Ayer indicated that the results flowed from its 2003-launched 2010 plan. CFO Brandon Pedersen indicated the results for the year translated into a record 11.1% pre-tax margin bringing the 2010 ROIC to 10.7%. He also noted 2010 was the first time since 1999 that Alaska reported profits in all four quarters
“While we support industry efforts to balance supply with demand, we believe the most efficient operators should grow more than the industry average,” Mr Ayer told analysts during yesterday’s call. “In contrast to flat domestic industry capacity since 2003, Air Group ASMs have grown 18%. At the same time we have reduced our non-fuel unit costs from 8.73 cents in 2001 to 7.85 cents in 2010. We are continuing that trend because, in my view, we are now in a permanently low-fare environment. With our new fleet order we have the option to grow 3-6% annually as long as conditions permit. But let me be clear, we will not grow if conditions don’t permit it. ”
Alaska announced a 15-aircraft order for Boeing 737s starting in 2010, including 13 -900ERs for delivery in 2013 through 2014. The new aircraft will go into trans-continental and mid-continental markets as well as high-density West Coast markets. Mr Ayer noted that Hawaii was a question mark when it launched its 2010 plan, but it now represents 15% of its flying, bringing it to a close second to United in terms of daily West Coast departures.
“While we support industry efforts to balance supply with demand, we believe the most efficient operators should grow more than the industry average,” Mr Ayer told analysts during yesterday’s call. “In contrast to flat domestic industry capacity since 2003, Air Group ASMs have grown 18%. At the same time we have reduced our non-fuel unit costs from 8.73 cents in 2001 to 7.85 cents in 2010. We are continuing that trend because, in my view, we are now in a permanently low-fare environment. With our new fleet order we have the option to grow 3-6% annually as long as conditions permit. But let me be clear, we will not grow if conditions don’t permit it. ”
Alaska announced a 15-aircraft order for Boeing 737s starting in 2010, including 13 -900ERs for delivery in 2013 through 2014. The new aircraft will go into trans-continental and mid-continental markets as well as high-density West Coast markets. Mr Ayer noted that Hawaii was a question mark when it launched its 2010 plan, but it now represents 15% of its flying, bringing it to a close second to United in terms of daily West Coast departures.
Another hole in an economic justification of outsourcing has to do with pay rates. Simply put, if our pay (cost structure) is higher than our partners our flying will be transferred to them. The partnership costs us the ability to negotiate "industry leading." As is always the case for giving management the choice of alter ego replacement of our pilots.
Scope = growth, job security, then pay. Most pilots just don't think three moves into the game.
We need to revisit Section 1 in Section 6. The opener needs to be "all Delta flying will be performed by Delta pilots." Management can figure out how to make them Delta pilots if they really want to fly Eskimo 737's to our hubs.
We fly airplanes. ALPA should not give management a choice.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 06-04-2011 at 04:21 AM.
Heard from a little birdie that four of our Compass new hires didn't make it through training. I asked a Compass CA sitting at my gate and he said he knew them all and that was incorrect. I see between Jan 11 and June 11 we lost five new hires. My impression was that we take as long as necessary to get everyone through?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,512
2 compass guys are no longer with you.
1 because he has a big mouth. (passed training and was fired later)
1 because he had trouble with the 9. He is a great guy!
1 because he has a big mouth. (passed training and was fired later)
1 because he had trouble with the 9. He is a great guy!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post