![]() |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1014399)
I'd be happy to see them here ... just pointing out the similarities with Lindsey Lohan ... the top ten:
(1) Both drink way too much (2) Both smoke (3) Both make noise when they really should be quiet (4) Both have limited range due to legal restrictions (5) Neither does math very quickly (6) Both are unpredictable when you take them out in public & neither follows commands well (7) Both get droopy when not powered up (8) Both leak inappropriately (9) Both show up in sequels (10) Both started out cute, but got stretched |
Ouch.
Summary of Comprehensive United Management Proposal for Joint Collective Bargaining Agreement _________________________________________ Section 1 – Scope o Industry Competitive Regional Flying restrictions: o 250 maximum large (less than 95 seats) regional jets (no restriction on props) o Maximum 6% regional jet flying between hubs o Minimum 90% into/out of Key/Hub Cities o Add large regional jets for increases in active mainline fleet (consistent with Delta) o Allow alliances/marketing arrangements so long as pilot positions protected o ALPA to keep seat on BOD o ALPA option to reopen for change in control o CBA binding on successors and affiliates o ALPA merger policy o No obligation to perform struck work o Company to retain management rights o Company will continue to oppose cabotage |
I dare say, this has to be the longest thread of any forum that I've ever been in.... that not withstanding, I wonder if anyone still subscribed to this thread can find out for me if DAL will re-interview an applicant who was rejected at the final portion (panel) interview? I had heard that you could fail the computer tests or the knowledge test and be re-invited, but not the personnel portion... still true?
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1014328)
It depends on many factors - the most important being is "What result does management desire at that particular moment?" Once management decides what it would like the end result to be, just fine tune the inputs, duration, assumptions etc, and wala! They have numbers to back them up - magic!
Even if management actually wanted an unbiased answer, it would still driven by subjective assumptions. For example - what will fuel cost next month, next year, or over the life of the aircraft? What is the duration you are looking at etc. Scoop Carl |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1014334)
Wow FTB, I agree completely with every word of your post...including the used cars - having been a used car dealer, I can tell you they are money generators.
I think also, the next step for DAL Mgmt is to announce the purchase of every 717 produced for cheap. Gotta work out something with those rolls royce guys, I've got a few connections there, but noone's asking me. Power by the hour worked for the harrier guys. It's clear to me that RA has decided that paying down debt really is his main goal. To that end, we will be flying really old airplanes for quite a long time. Our 777's and A330's are going to be the newest we see for a while. Hope the gamble works out for us, because this is now our course. Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1014399)
I'd be happy to see them here, in fact, I'd hit it ... just pointing out the similarities with another nutball project born in 1986, Lindsey Lohan.
(1) Both started out cute, but got stretched (2) Both smoke (3) Both make noise when they really should be quiet (4) Both have legal restrictions which limit how high they are supposed to get (5) Neither does math very quickly (6) Both are unpredictable when you take them out in public & neither follows commands well (7) Both get droopy when not powered up (8) Both leak inappropriately (9) Both show up in sequels (10) Both drink waaay too much Bonus (11) When either tries to stop, they get the shakes Bonus 2 (12) Both are frequently driven by people on probation Bonus 3 (13) The MD88 makes a lot of SkyMiles, Lindsey makes lots of Marlboro miles Bonus 4 (14) Both do a pretty good job, but getting there involves too much drama Carl |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1014399)
I'd be happy to see them here, in fact, I'd hit it ... just pointing out the similarities with another nutball project born in 1986, Lindsey Lohan.
(1) Both started out cute, but got stretched (2) Both smoke (3) Both make noise when they really should be quiet (4) Both have legal restrictions which limit how high they are supposed to get (5) Neither does math very quickly (6) Both are unpredictable when you take them out in public & neither follows commands well (7) Both get droopy when not powered up (8) Both leak inappropriately (9) Both show up in sequels (10) Both drink waaay too much Bonus (11) When either tries to stop, they get the shakes Bonus 2 (12) Both are frequently driven by people on probation Bonus 3 (13) The MD88 makes a lot of SkyMiles, Lindsey makes lots of Marlboro miles Bonus 4 (14) Both do a pretty good job, but getting there involves too much drama |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1014426)
Hoping to get anything used on the cheap is our future here at Delta. Bar was absolutely correct in his analysis. New Boeings or Airbuses are out of the question now in any meaningful quantity. That decision is done.
It's clear to me that RA has decided that paying down debt really is his main goal. To that end, we will be flying really old airplanes for quite a long time. Our 777's and A330's are going to be the newest we see for a while. Hope the gamble works out for us, because this is now our course. Carl Don't forget about the 787's that will be coming soon...... Right around the corner in 2020. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by RCD73
(Post 1013990)
The spray on flight suits and the turtle necks are a little creepy. Followed up with synchronised hand shaking .....
The flying is great. I'd leave the rest out unless you want to freak out anybody born after 1975 :eek: |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1014426)
Hoping to get anything used on the cheap is our future here at Delta. Bar was absolutely correct in his analysis. New Boeings or Airbuses are out of the question now in any meaningful quantity. That decision is done.
It's clear to me that RA has decided that paying down debt really is his main goal. To that end, we will be flying really old airplanes for quite a long time. Our 777's and A330's are going to be the newest we see for a while. Hope the gamble works out for us, because this is now our course. Carl This exact same discussion went around in the late nineties when pilots were saying we were locked out of the market because Boeing and Airbus were sold out. Next thing you know we were getting all kinds of different aircraft brand new. We will get what we want when we want. When it comes to aircraft purchase Delta is a 800 lb gorilla. Airbus, Boeing and others are making huge efforts as we speak to be the choice of Delta in its recent request for bids for deliveries starting in 2013. They are not sitting home saying were sold out can't help you! |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands