![]() |
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1015637)
blah, blah, blah.....
blah, blah, blah.... Carl, your rhetoric bores me. Carl |
Exactly. We have to bust the myth that Scope is somehow a seperate or niche issue. Scope is Pay. Scope is Retirement. Scope is Vacation. Scope is simply the jobs that everything else in the contract applies to.
|
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 1015420)
I have to agree 100%.
I told our reps what my number is and it is above SWA +1%. For us to get a yes vote they will need to fix everything else and beast the old/current SWA rates by a good margin. Just remember when filling out the survey, Scope and Pay in that order. Add in the fact that some of our reps are making twice of what some of our Captains are making and then come to the conclusion that this circus does not need a complete restructure. New representation just passed half the cards they need, with the latest greatest from our dear reps, it can only increase.... |
Originally Posted by FlyingViking
(Post 1015666)
Is it just me or is it just wrong that we as pilots in the second biggest airline in the world is comparing our payrates to a domestic LOW COST carrier ?
Add in the fact that some of our reps are making twice of what some of our Captains are making and then come to the conclusion that this circus does not need a complete restructure. New representation just passed half the cards they need, with the latest greatest from our dear reps, it can only increase.... Carl |
Pay rates are great, but I think we should mostly be focusing on other ways to increase compensation, like bringing back significant night pay, big nums for international pay, and a huge (x4) increase in per diem. And pay from doors closed to open. Larger minimum calendar day, not duty period. These are all ways to make significantly more cash, some tax advantaged, with lower increases to hourly rates. That way the company gets to tell the financial community that we only gave x when the reality is much more.
|
Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy
(Post 1015626)
Carl, I find this laughable. What makes you think AirTran pilots will be making more than 777 Captains in 2013? SWA pilots maybe, but not AirTran....
|
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1015691)
Pay rates are great, but I think we should mostly be focusing on other ways to increase compensation, like bringing back significant night pay, big nums for international pay, and a huge (x4) increase in per diem. And pay from sign in to doors open. Larger minimum calendar day, not duty period. These are all ways to make significantly more cash, some tax advantaged, with lower increases to hourly rates. That way the company gets to tell the financial community that we only gave x when the reality is much more.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1015697)
Yessir... but I fixed part of your post. I hope you don't mind.
|
Originally Posted by nwaf16dude
(Post 1015691)
Pay rates are great, but I think we should mostly be focusing on other ways to increase compensation, like bringing back significant night pay, big nums for international pay, and a huge (x4) increase in per diem. And pay from doors closed to open. Larger minimum calendar day, not duty period. These are all ways to make significantly more cash, some tax advantaged, with lower increases to hourly rates. That way the company gets to tell the financial community that we only gave x when the reality is much more.
Raising per diem that much would not be a smart move. There is no real tax advantage once you reach the accepted deductions for transport workers for meal expenses. The IRS is quite wise to move pay into other areas to try and avoid taxes. You will be taxed on the excess per diem. What you wont get on that money is the 13 percent DC or the ability to contribute some of it to your 401k and fill your 415C limit. Some increase in per diem to the max allowed tax free would be good. That is probably not more then 50 cents an hour more then current. The rest should be in pay. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1015661)
Exactly. We have to bust the myth that Scope is somehow a seperate or niche issue. Scope is Pay. Scope is Retirement. Scope is Vacation. Scope is simply the jobs that everything else in the contract applies to.
Compensation is Section 3. Been that way for awhile. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:50 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands