Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

shiznit 07-04-2011 05:25 AM


Originally Posted by Pineapple Guy (Post 1016929)
On a completely unrelated topic, hopefully less controversial.:)

I'm an ex-military guy, but I've got a friend coming over for July 4th with two high schoolers interested in our profession. For the young civilian guys out there: what's the best route now a days, assuming money is no object?

Much appreciated.

Air National Guard.

Avoid active mil, too long a commitment now (wings +10), and you might end up flying a desktop computer.

Any 4 year college and go to the local flight school. Least expensive route by far, but doesn't offer the ability to create connections in the industry (See FTB's roomate), that can translate to 2-5 years of a headstart.

a 4 Year university with a flight program (Purdue, Auburn, Ariz. Stat., Ohio State., a few smaller state schools (U Minn. St. Cloud, Mid. Tenn. St. Univ., etc.) Positives are lots of accredited internship oppotunities, many industry connections, reasonable prices(state schools), and also the option to change majors into many other areas and not have to change schools, lots of extracurricular options, and a more traditional "college experience".

Private 4 year schools (ERAU?), really, really expensive, but you do get the internship opportunities and industry connections that are very helpful. If the person decides to change majors to something outside aviation, transferring is pretty much the only option.

Any 4 year anywhere and then go to a pilot academy, AllATP's, knock out all the ratings in 9 months right after graduation (can be kinda pricey, but effective in the amount of time spent) get into flight instructing and onto a 121 job soon thereafter.

shiznit 07-04-2011 05:31 AM


Originally Posted by cni187 (Post 1016626)
Just had a guy in the jumpseat today that said this exact same thing. He was a dude involved in ALPA stuff but quit cuz he got fed up. Said DPA is around 3000 now but that we shouldn't split up before a contract negotiation

Rumor. Speculation.

No "ALPA dude" will spout numbers (well anyone in a capacity to have a direct effect on neg. (LEC/MEC/NC).

Once again.....DALPA has not polled the pilots yet........It is coming this summer/early fall.....

Ask anyone who was around for the C2K contract survey when it came out!!!!!

There is almost 18 months until the Amendable date, and there are 3 Legacy airlines who are already in talks. When(if) one of those 3 inks a new deal that is above the current SWA deal, all of the people who wanted DALPA to make a public campaign of "We want SWA" will look like fools for setting the bar too low. Now you go into negotiations and have hurt the leverage of the NC when the Company goes "You just said for a year that you wanted SWA, here it is...." when AA or UCAL may have exceeded that by 5-10-15%!!!!!

Bill Lumberg 07-04-2011 05:33 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 1017638)
If you do not like what you are getting from your Reps, force the issue. If that does not work recall them. Once recalled, put someone in that beleives what you do, and have them change the leaders of ALPA.

If you cannot get enough support for that sort of drive, it is, because the majority of the pilots in your base do not agree with the position.

The contract survey is not out yet, but will be by early fall. It is on about the same timeline that the survey was done for C2K.

When are the next elections? Prior to the contract or opener? If not, and the opener is weak, then we have a year or two before the contract is done, which is enough time to vote in DPA. That could delay a contract, but it will more reflect what the group wants.

Dirty 07-04-2011 06:18 AM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1017658)
All right, here is a quote straight from the DPA website:



So even DPA knows that the basis of your contract is the financial condition of the company that you work for. If you are going to negotiate, then you have to start with an accurate picture. If you pull out some propaganda from a flyer that is meant to persuade other pilots to accept a bad seniority integration, then you might as well ask the negotiators to put on a clown suit. You have to have credibility both with the people you are negotiating against and with the NMB that has the power to suspend your negotiations indefinitely.

So, everyone would like more money and more time off. Get over yourself and realize that everyone has the same goal, it is just that to accomplish your goal, you can't act like an idiot and expect any results. Maybe that will give some brief moment of Zen on the internet to spout off how tough you are, but in the end I want more money. Losing your head and making a fool of yourself is not the way to get it. Period.

So I don't know who you are, but you have convinced me that I don't want you running the show. Emotional rants will get me nothing.


This kind of propaganda reminds me of being a new hire at DAL when crew scheduling comes in and shows you how the one captain is successfully doing "Rolling Thunder". They spun it in such a way that I could expect that as the norm... as a new hire on reserve.

However, I have many good friends at SWA and they certainly make more than I do with more days off.

So I guess what I'm trying to say is that while their memo to the tranny guys looks like pure propaganda the fact still remains that my buddies at SWA still make more (way more on reserve) and enjoy more days off.

DAL 88 Driver 07-04-2011 06:45 AM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1017662)
That publication also is a management kool-aid drinkers paradise. 10 pages are devoted to how wonderful the company is and how they have picnic together, etc.

I thought that an union should NOT carry the company's water?

Actually, I think under normal circumstances the union and management should work together. SWA has a management that values and respects its employees. And they back that up with the way they TREAT their employees. That's the way business is supposed to work! From what I've seen, I think SWAPA's relationship with management is appropriate. DALPA's relationship with DAL management is a completely different story, IMO.

But the bottom line on the ValuTran welcome publication (as it relates to our discussion here) is this: Is it factual or not? Does the average SWA Captain make over $230k or not? Does the average SWA F/O make over $140k or not? Do they average working 12 days per month? If this data is true, then they are being paid WAY more than Delta's domestic narrowbody pilots... and working LESS days! Any attempt to minimize the importance and relevance of that to us, is just spin and an attempt to lower our expectations.


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1017662)
It is a publication that 'brags' on SWA pilots, its not filled with 10-k numbers, actual bid results, end of month numbers, etc. Just one or two anecdotal trip trades....remember that the guy who "dropped" the low time trip in the example to pick up, one person is now flying one less trip that month and/or someone else had to fly the lower time trip be it a reserve or a line holder. Its an "I LUV Me....and So Should You" rag. Little more.

Again, you hold up SWA as a model.... You're shooting way too low and damaging MY chances of a better outcome on the next PWA.

I don't think you've proven anything with your "anecdotal trip trade" example. And maybe I am shooting too low. I'd like for our MD-88/90 Captains to make more than $230,000 per year. Heck, I'd like to make $1 million per year. But we have to deal in reality. To get our MD-88/90 Captains to $230k would require about a 57% increase to our current pay rates. If you want to shoot for more than that, I'm all for it. But good luck with that with ALPA as our bargaining agent. I'll be surprised if their opening position will be even a 30% pay increase.

sinca3 07-04-2011 06:49 AM


Originally Posted by Dirty (Post 1017680)
This kind of propaganda reminds me of being a new hire at DAL when crew scheduling comes in and shows you how the one captain is successfully doing "Rolling Thunder". They spun it in such a way that I could expect that as the norm... as a new hire on reserve.

However, I have many good friends at SWA and they certainly make more than I do with more days off.

So I guess what I'm trying to say is that while their memo to the tranny guys looks like pure propaganda the fact still remains that my buddies at SWA still make more (way more on reserve) and enjoy more days off.

I think you and I must have been in the same new hire class! I too agree, that no matter how you spin it the facts still remains my friends at SWA are making more and working less days than I am.
I also agree with much of what Alfa/Sailing et all are saying. I think many on here aren't willing to be a little more open minded. I guess it's hard when you've given, had taken, and been burned one too many times!
Good Luck to us all on a prosperous career.
Happy 235th Birthday America!!

Ferd149 07-04-2011 06:51 AM

Well.......I guess those in the know blew me and my question off.

<sigh>

Thanks DALPA dudes

scambo1 07-04-2011 07:07 AM


Originally Posted by Ferd149 (Post 1017690)
Well.......I guess those in the know blew me and my question off.

<sigh>

Thanks DALPA dudes


Ferd;

The official alpa answer is: Unequivocally YES, I mean err no, well lets just go with maybe.:D

sailingfun 07-04-2011 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1017651)
Only 8-10% pay raise? Seems a bit low - because we certainly have 3 day trips that pay 11-14 hours, while at SWA a 3 day trip would pay 16.89 hrs (19.5 TRP * 0.8666) of pay.

Also, just comparing 737 vs 737, Delta 12 yr Captain pays $174 while SWA pays $210 (that's not a TRP rate, that's been converted to $/hr). Maybe it's my math, but that alone requires a 21% raise, just to meet their current pay.

Yep, you're right, but take those numbers and reduce the pay, it's still plenty more per day than we're making.


You are again cherry picking. We don't have 3 day trips of similar time away from base that pay that much less then SWA. Your talking 3 day trips with 2 duty periods leaving very late on day one and back very early on day 3. SWAPA has dog rotations also.
What you once again forget is that there are entire other sections of the contract besides compensation. The SWAPA contract allows SW to run a very lean operation. In 2009 where the were somewhat overstaffed they had 10.5 pilots per aircraft. Delta had over 14. Even looking at just domestic we were staffed at 12.5.
If we can get the entire SW contract I guess it would make you happy. The 2000 plus Delta pilots who get sent to the street wont however be real happy or the 1000 Captains who downgrade.
You can cherry pick anything and show a good result. I had 186 hours pay in Dec and worked 14 days. Thats a average of over 13 hours a day. That does not however make it the reality of a normal month for a Delta pilot.

hockeypilot44 07-04-2011 07:44 AM

Why do I always get uncommutable short call? I can get to base by 7:30 in the morning. Is it too much to ask for a 5:30 or later short call. My last 4 have now been 5am or 3am.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands