Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 5
I think you accidentally set it to "(rhymes with bhore)."
Last edited by RoughLandings; 09-14-2011 at 08:22 PM. Reason: replace b with w for the proper quote
Just for anyone else who wanted to know, apparently if your on long call and take the shorter callout for GS pay it should show an F on your schedule instead of a G to be payed correctly. If it falls on an X day or if your a line holder then it is a G next to the trip. This was how John (From Scheduling) explained it to me. Remember knowing is half the battle
Thanks again
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Taken care of, thanks
Last edited by Brocc15; 09-15-2011 at 08:33 AM. Reason: Problem solved
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 193
1 800 USA ALPA. Ask for contract administration. Curtis is excellent but anyone can help. They have the same computer access to look things up that crews scheduling has. Most are former schedulers from back when they knew what they were doing.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 193
Hanging on to DAL stock waiting for it to get to $X.XX is like the AA pilots negotiating strategy. It's all about opportunity cost. You can take that money the DAL stock sale generates and do something else with it right now that will have a greater probability of success sooner. Why wait six months, two years, or five years to get to some arbitrary target?
Why would you have your retirement eggs in the same basket as your paycheck? Get rid of it yesterday. It's never a gain until you sell it and put the money in your pocket. Most people can't stand to take gains. They end up riding a stock up and down a half a dozen times. They justify their inability to take gains by saying they are "long term investors." DAL is a bad long term investment. Airlines are bad long term investments. Airline stocks are trades. There's a difference.
You should never invest in the company who writes your paycheck. Never, never, never. Did I say never. Now trading options for fun in DAL is another matter entirely and it is not for the faint of heart. If you know what you are doing, it's okay. Still, I wouldn't do a lot of it. Only with money you can afford to lose.
So, bottom line is this: You should have sold a long time ago and moved on.
Why would you have your retirement eggs in the same basket as your paycheck? Get rid of it yesterday. It's never a gain until you sell it and put the money in your pocket. Most people can't stand to take gains. They end up riding a stock up and down a half a dozen times. They justify their inability to take gains by saying they are "long term investors." DAL is a bad long term investment. Airlines are bad long term investments. Airline stocks are trades. There's a difference.
You should never invest in the company who writes your paycheck. Never, never, never. Did I say never. Now trading options for fun in DAL is another matter entirely and it is not for the faint of heart. If you know what you are doing, it's okay. Still, I wouldn't do a lot of it. Only with money you can afford to lose.
So, bottom line is this: You should have sold a long time ago and moved on.
Excellent advice!
Fair questions that when I wrote what I wrote, I knew would be coming. I dont want to really go down that road on this thread, but your annual target is closer to my bi-weekly target.
Your last paragraph is honestly something I am trying to get my own brain around. Guns and bunkers arent the answer. Owning large land tracts which will likely become nationalized (by raising property taxes- to pay for overbloated local services-to the point that even the rich cant afford to pay them) isnt the answer. Physical gold? some yes, but not enough to have the door knocked down over...gotta be federally licensed now to do it legally...thanks tarp2. I was going to buy a 65' live aboard catamaran a few years ago as an escape vessel, but figured if the place really melted down to that extent, I'd just hop on the nearest one I saw.
Like I said, still working on it.
Anyone got any ideas.
Got a question for you. How long til the market tanks due to the euro meltdown without a trans-national consensus bailout plan?
Your last paragraph is honestly something I am trying to get my own brain around. Guns and bunkers arent the answer. Owning large land tracts which will likely become nationalized (by raising property taxes- to pay for overbloated local services-to the point that even the rich cant afford to pay them) isnt the answer. Physical gold? some yes, but not enough to have the door knocked down over...gotta be federally licensed now to do it legally...thanks tarp2. I was going to buy a 65' live aboard catamaran a few years ago as an escape vessel, but figured if the place really melted down to that extent, I'd just hop on the nearest one I saw.
Like I said, still working on it.
Anyone got any ideas.
Got a question for you. How long til the market tanks due to the euro meltdown without a trans-national consensus bailout plan?

As for getting 12% bi-weekly... well aren't you taking a considerable amount of risk? Are you consistently getting that?? I have a lot of doubt that a strategy aiming for something like that will be successful long term, but I certainly wish you the best of luck with it! I'm trying something right now (my father in law found it and is using it). The track record on this one is 68% annualized return so far (as of yesterday). But it's a really short track record (since Feb 2010). Here's the blog where they show their results: TradeOnAUTO Lite. I wouldn't even think of doing something like this with my retirement. I just have a small amount in it that I could afford to lose.
I have no idea. I don't believe that anyone can predict that sort of thing with any great degree of accuracy. I also don't think it's a given that is going to even happen. I know "doom and gloom" is popular right now... and with some good reason. But crises come and go. Generally, the people who do well are the ones who do not panic. I just don't believe the likelihood of economic collapse is great enough to justify deviating from a plan that is working for me. Your mileage may vary. 
As for getting 12% bi-weekly... well aren't you taking a considerable amount of risk? Are you consistently getting that?? I have a lot of doubt that a strategy aiming for something like that will be successful long term, but I certainly wish you the best of luck with it! I'm trying something right now (my father in law found it and is using it). The track record on this one is 68% annualized return so far (as of yesterday). But it's a really short track record (since Feb 2010). Here's the blog where they show their results: TradeOnAUTO Lite. I wouldn't even think of doing something like this with my retirement. I just have a small amount in it that I could afford to lose.

As for getting 12% bi-weekly... well aren't you taking a considerable amount of risk? Are you consistently getting that?? I have a lot of doubt that a strategy aiming for something like that will be successful long term, but I certainly wish you the best of luck with it! I'm trying something right now (my father in law found it and is using it). The track record on this one is 68% annualized return so far (as of yesterday). But it's a really short track record (since Feb 2010). Here's the blog where they show their results: TradeOnAUTO Lite. I wouldn't even think of doing something like this with my retirement. I just have a small amount in it that I could afford to lose.
I'm really not interested in going down this road on this forum. I'm a slow typist and not a great teacher. Yes there is risk as with everything in life. Last year I did a little less than 105%. This year I am on target to double that.
As to gloom and doom? Please help me see how the demographics are able to support the debt loads (I mean the real debt loads, not the short term ones). Go ahead and keep your head, I dont care.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post







