![]() |
Originally Posted by newKnow
(Post 620490)
I also wonder if FO's will be able to reach ALL the way over to the start switches, ready to lift up the fuel control levers, then quickly switch to give the customary "tap" of the N1 gauge when it gets stuck. I guess I can break away from my busy schedule to do it.
As far as the preflight, if the do it the NWA way, get your preflight guide from Vol I and study it heavily. That was the hardest part of checking out, because they were serious about, the order things were done in, how many seconds buttons should be held down, time in between system tests, ect. If not, forget everything I said and be thankful. :) Well the CBTs for preflight & engine starts just popped up in my syllabus on LMS. I didn't bother looking at them yet. I've got the start of DC9 requal today & Phase 2 procedures are already messing with me enough. ;) It says the deadline for them is completion before the scheduled sim, so as anticipated it's a completely separate training event. Looks like NATCO 2 months in a row for me. :D |
Originally Posted by Superdad
(Post 621163)
When I did TOE on the ER, the checkairmen said that the procedure of disarming the autobrakes with the sppedbrakes on the runway was approved by the FAA.
Ask 5 feds a question and you will get 5 different answers. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 620912)
Bite your tongue bro... that "flexability" costs jobs.... :mad: Keeping 'em split is a good thing which is rapidly dissolving at DAL-S
I'll take you at your word since you know more about your crazy system. Of course, I'm for keeping more guys around. But, you'll have to show me since it doesn't make since to me. The blockholders would be the same, seems to me, so we are talking about reserves. But once again, wouldn't those be close since we man by jet? Or even reserves by blockhour? The other thing that seems odd is your international guys go in for training twice per year, while we only go in once. So, it's not the Feds who are making you guys go in twice. How often to you have to practice turning off the track, turning on all the lights and getting the single engine cruise info up:D But, like I said I'm all for keeping the max guys possible around.......especially now. But, it sure is nice doing lots of things or going to certain places only during certain times of year. Ferd |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 621193)
T,
I'll take you at your word since you know more about your crazy system. Of course, I'm for keeping more guys around. But, you'll have to show me since it doesn't make since to me. The blockholders would be the same, seems to me, so we are talking about reserves. But once again, wouldn't those be close since we man by jet? Or even reserves by blockhour? The other thing that seems odd is your international guys go in for training twice per year, while we only go in once. So, it's not the Feds who are making you guys go in twice. How often to you have to practice turning off the track, turning on all the lights and getting the single engine cruise info up:D But, like I said I'm all for keeping the max guys possible around.......especially now. But, it sure is nice doing lots of things or going to certain places only during certain times of year. Ferd |
Originally Posted by NWA320pilot
(Post 621198)
What I am going to have to go twice???:eek: I have a hard enough time with going to MSP once per year......
Is this correct southies? Ferd |
What our international guys do is in effect a splitting of the normal annual check. The six month is a short event and the 12 month is a two day standard requal. It helps keep the guys current and out of the box for currency every three months. This way if they cannot get their landings in, they only come in twice for bumps not three to four times a year depending on how their cycle runs.
Also with keeping em separate. With that jet doing the lion's share of the flying, do you really want a guy on reserve who never flies responsible for the nuances of five continents???? I know I would not like it. |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 621205)
What our international guys do is in effect a splitting of the normal annual check. The six month is a short event and the 12 month is a two day standard requal. It helps keep the guys current and out of the box for currency every three months. This way if they cannot get their landings in, they only come in twice for bumps not three to four times a year depending on how their cycle runs.
Also with keeping em separate. With that jet doing the lion's share of the flying, do you really want a guy on reserve who never flies responsible for the nuances of five continents???? I know I would not like it. |
Acl,
But, that is why we put the info in the airway manual, I know I put in a bunch of dividers (did I get that one right?) for the nuance? I don't do much AMS, maybe just a few times a year, but I read the P-0 pages and the QRM enroute and I'm comfortable. As I've said before, I'll do it how the man wants it done with a smile on my face. I just don't think I'm unprepared now. Ferd |
We have the most issues in the 777. Twice the number of pilots as we do landings. That is where the biggest issue is.
The non-international guys do a once a year requal. They split it in to two for the international guys. There are a ton of reasons for it, but the fact is that this is the way the current head thinkers want it. It does not mean it will not change, it just means that you get three days in the sim. One at six months and two and twelve. Us domestic guys to three days at once. |
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 621208)
Acl,
But, that is why we put the info in the airway manual, I know I put in a bunch of dividers (did I get that one right?) for the nuance? I don't do much AMS, maybe just a few times a year, but I read the P-0 pages and the QRM enroute and I'm comfortable. As I've said before, I'll do it how the man wants it done with a smile on my face. I just don't think I'm unprepared now. Ferd |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands