![]() |
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1075603)
This is interesting: (sorry for the formatting)
______________________________ RELEASE #10.DCPA FEBRUARY 10, 2010 PILOT-LED ALLIANCE TARGETS SAFETY INITIATIVES AT DELTA CONNECTION AIRLINES Nu |
Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob
(Post 1075610)
88,
This is about stopping the whipsaw between the different DCI groups. If they can stop the spiral, it can establish a floor for us to go up from. Ltes meet and confer on this and see if you and I agree. |
Dow up over 12,000 on Greek bailout plan. GDP up 2.5%. Glad I didn't go to all cash over a month ago like some on here were doing.
The market always wins. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1075731)
How can they ever do that? The entire reason there is a DCI in the first place is to whipsaw DCI carriers against DCI carriers. There really isn't even any DCI versus Mainline whipsaw anyway, as DCI automatically underbids and gets the work so it comes down to DCI vs DCI.
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1075731)
This has been tried before and never got off the ground. In fact the race to the bottom only accelerated as ACMI providers shoved each other aside to win the next RFP. ... Any DCI carrier that tries to raise the bar in any significant way for any length of time is punished severely.
How will an alliance convince one DCI carrier to overbid another knowing the one that underbid them got the work? How will a DCI alliance stop non DCI airlines from putting in a lower bid? How will it stop new DCI's from being created? When the President of ALPA unveiled his alliance plan it was obviously unworkable and destined for instant failure. The same guy touts the advantages in outsourcing for mainline pilots ... .
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1075731)
This is a mainline problem and the solution has to be a mainline solution. Mainline and DCI can collaborate to a point, but anything greater than a staple with some reasonable DCI protections is a non starter. Yet even that requires 100% mainline bargaining to secure for it to have any real meaning (scope recapture). Only mainline pilot groups can fix this by reclaiming scope. There is no other way.
Unity is structural. One airline, one bargaining agent, one contract. When any pilot has a problem ALL pilots have a problem. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1075273)
Gotta love it, kid needs 4 stitches, urgent care says go to our ER because they'll have a plastics guy who can do better. Go to ER, no plastics guy. 2 hours later we leave.
Total bill $1400, total we owe after Delta insurance, $995. I bring this up because remember where we were talking about how about being paid enough to afford our own product, as in airline tickets? I'd be happy if we could just afford to take our kid in for stitches on our company insurance without having to resort to making payment plans. There are some real problems with UHC that threaten the financial security of our pilots. Since we co-insure ourselves you are exposed to WHATEVER rates UHC negotiates with providers. In most cases those rates are lower than standard self pay rates and closer to Medicaid reimbursement (WellStar for instance is allegedly a "non profit" provider). Most of the time we happily see a 70% discount and go about our ways. But what if UHC decides to enter into a contract which pays much MORE than you would owe otherwise? You will find that under law you owe it. In our case the procedure was billed at just under six times the Medicare rate, which was more than four times UHC's own "usual and customary" rate for non network providers. UHC is exempt from the laws which regulate insurers, as well as anti trust and consumer protection regulations. A fight with these guys could easily leave a Delta employee bankrupt and given the depth of their abuses there probably are some examples out there to be found. |
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1075694)
I have always been a big Magnum fan but he just does not have the staying power of Bond or Kirk.
Chuck Norris definitely has the staying power but is an actor not a character. He would probably fare very well if looking for action actors but Clint would get my vote in that category. Hey, that brings another character to mind - Dirty Harry. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1075787)
PM sent.
There are some real problems with UHC that threaten the financial security of our pilots. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1075793)
I'm really glad I got to read that post before you removed it. Excellent job of how to handle this. Very well done. I wish you wouldn't have removed it.
Carl One funny aspect of it was that TWO MONTHS later, while non reving back from a hike in Banff the Royal Canadian Mounted Police detected "bomb making materials" on our infant and considered taking her into custody until we explained the whole story. Those sniffers at the airport work amazingly well. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1075796)
Thanks Carl, but it was a little too personal and it still really upsets me.
Nice work with threatening service of process in a personal setting. Funny how people get motivated to do the right thing when they might have to be held personally accountable for how they put food on the table, rather than hiding behind a lawyer. It was some rapper, I think JayZ, who in an interview said he preferred the illegal drug business to the music industry. He said on the street, a handshake and your word meant something... and if you broke your word there were consequences. Not so in the music industry, he said people lie to your face and hide behind lawyers. It seems that's pretty much how business in America works. I have a lawyer in the family, he calls this behavior the "flinch test." Most people bend over and pay. Once you engage a lawyer, your letters go to a whole different level in the company and they do a quick cost benefit analysis of the case, and at least come to the table with an offer. At any rate, It's too bad you had to go through all that. |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1075774)
Dow up over 12,000 on Greek bailout plan. GDP up 2.5%. Glad I didn't go to all cash over a month ago like some on here were doing.
The market always wins. "If you haven't set up a brokeragelink do it first thing monday morning. Put all available investable assets there (sitting in a tax exempt moneymarket trust). The market is going to fall off a cliff within the next 2 weeks... sooner rather than later. Wait for the market to hit bottom...by 3rd week in Oct. Buy a good 3X etf like tna or erx. Plan to sell in april sometime and shift your holdings to a 3X inverse etf like FAZ. Rinse repeat. Not much babysitting required. FWIW, from the guy who bought erx monday (not friday) at 30.80 and sold tues for 38, a 25% gain in two days in full view of you folks. Again, not investment advice, do your own due diligence, your mileage may vary, you are responsible for your own actions, etc." |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:22 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands