Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Banned
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: 330Fo
For those wanting to vilify Richard Anderson I would like to take you to task on that. Look at the facts:
1) He fought against Mike Levine and John Dasburg and argued against them taking Northwest to a strike in '98. After the strike Levine wanted to park the 74s and fill the pacific with used DC-10s. It was Anderson that argued and won (being appointed to CEO over him) to update the NWA fleet. 319/320s in place of 727s and 330s to replace the DC-10s.
2) He offered the NWA pilots a 10 percent raise after 9/11 without a fight, which is why I personally believe that we will see a SWA like contract mid next year.
3) When Anderson left NWA in October of '04 he left millions of dollars of NWA stock on the table. He knew what was coming down the pipe and wanted no part of it.
4) What Anderson made at United Health Care was multiple times more than what he is getting at Delta. He took a massive pay cut to come back to the airlines. Anybody that has ever heard him speak knows that he loves airplanes and does love this industry. He truly has a vision of building a world class airline. That is his motivation not money. Yes, he is cutting back and Delta is saving money/paying down debt, because, once again he is trying to build a financially stable airline.
5) Look at the rest of the industry. Tell me that every other wouldn't love to have Anderson as a CEO. DAL has posted a 3B profit in the last 18 months where AA has lost 1B. That is a 4B differential in a very short time. That's staggering!
Look at the rest of the industry:
-USAir-civil war between the east and west.
-United/Continental 10 year differential in relative seniority. Wait till that battle begins.
-AA-Sad. Truly poor and sorry management!
-Southwest- Let's see how this stapling of AirTran works.
Carl, before you refute my points, I'll admit I can't beat you in a debate however I am pro DPA but not because I see a ghost behind every management team decision but because I see Alpa as conflicted.
I'll take our management team over any in the industry.
1) He fought against Mike Levine and John Dasburg and argued against them taking Northwest to a strike in '98. After the strike Levine wanted to park the 74s and fill the pacific with used DC-10s. It was Anderson that argued and won (being appointed to CEO over him) to update the NWA fleet. 319/320s in place of 727s and 330s to replace the DC-10s.
2) He offered the NWA pilots a 10 percent raise after 9/11 without a fight, which is why I personally believe that we will see a SWA like contract mid next year.
3) When Anderson left NWA in October of '04 he left millions of dollars of NWA stock on the table. He knew what was coming down the pipe and wanted no part of it.
4) What Anderson made at United Health Care was multiple times more than what he is getting at Delta. He took a massive pay cut to come back to the airlines. Anybody that has ever heard him speak knows that he loves airplanes and does love this industry. He truly has a vision of building a world class airline. That is his motivation not money. Yes, he is cutting back and Delta is saving money/paying down debt, because, once again he is trying to build a financially stable airline.
5) Look at the rest of the industry. Tell me that every other wouldn't love to have Anderson as a CEO. DAL has posted a 3B profit in the last 18 months where AA has lost 1B. That is a 4B differential in a very short time. That's staggering!
Look at the rest of the industry:
-USAir-civil war between the east and west.
-United/Continental 10 year differential in relative seniority. Wait till that battle begins.
-AA-Sad. Truly poor and sorry management!
-Southwest- Let's see how this stapling of AirTran works.
Carl, before you refute my points, I'll admit I can't beat you in a debate however I am pro DPA but not because I see a ghost behind every management team decision but because I see Alpa as conflicted.
I'll take our management team over any in the industry.
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
It was widely reported at the time that Delta had to buy out Richard's remaining contract at UHC to get him to come to Delta, which cost about $15Million, so he's not doing this for free...
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Wow! Did Tebow just make that happen? That was impressive.
Our CEO doesn't think we need anything like the increases it would take to bring our W2's up to SWA pilots W2's. Our union won't even acknowledge the extent of the difference in compensation. I don't think I'm going to hold my breath that we will see a SWA like contract by mid next year. I'd love to see it. But without anyone even trying to achieve it and a CEO who thinks we're already there, I don't think it's going to just magically happen.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
From: non acceptus excretus
Opus, that was a good post, and I think you are right about the SWA pay at the end of a section 6, which I think your insight to RA is pretty good....The thing to remember is that in 2002 when the NWA pilots got 10percent raise is we still had to negotiate a while for it, the raise wasn't immediately offered it just seemed really fast because at NWA we always had to go to amendable date plus a couple of years and quite often all the way to a cooling off period.That time they negotiated for a bit and came up with a TA pretty quickly instead of the full hoops of the Railway Labor Act like we usually did. I think things will go in the RA style that you framed.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
I would encourage you to stop spinning the facts and changing the subject. Furthermore, you using American yet again as another tool of fear is pathetic. American is not in its current position due to a lack of JV's. American is where it is because they are one-third smaller than us, yet they have nearly DOUBLE the debt. I know that fact doesn't help you spin your MEC party line, but that's the facts. If JV's and code share were critical to success, Southwest would be bankrupt.
Carl
How much unsecured debt (the kind that gets wiped out in bankruptcy) does American have? What is their total debt? What is Delta's total debt?
Most importantly, why has American's PRASM performance lagged so far behind Delta for the last few years? Why are they losing business travelers to Delta?
You have just about shot any credibility you ever had with your vitriol, that is why I usually don't bother to respond to you. However, you made some bold assertions so come on ace, back up those assertions with facts.
What!!! They aren't even on FPL and they're posting. Or maybe FPL covers sunday too.
1. I dont recall anyone posting anything about RA.
2. I dont know any pilot that has done an FBI level profile on RA.
3. I dont know why anyone pulling a wikipedia resume written by RA would post it as proof of anything.
4. I would like our collective bargaining agent to come out in the open and state its contract goals, not we heard you loud and clear.
1. I dont recall anyone posting anything about RA.
2. I dont know any pilot that has done an FBI level profile on RA.
3. I dont know why anyone pulling a wikipedia resume written by RA would post it as proof of anything.
4. I would like our collective bargaining agent to come out in the open and state its contract goals, not we heard you loud and clear.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
Saling;
I did more than call the office. I talked to the person responsible for crafting this language face to face, and then via e-mail at length.
If we were at 0, 0 then 49.5 we would have bigger problems to deal with. Under the terms spelled out in MOU 14, once reaching 49.50 it is considered 50-50 and at that point a new measurement period starts. There is no look back for this scenario. They basically have three years to get there since we started at 47.2 with the addition of AZ. Some purport we could go to 0, 0 then be in compliance and that may true, but unrealistic. The bigger game is we get half of the EASK's available going forward.
What George mentions about there being no bottom end compliance right now is as far as I can tell, and as far as I have been told by those who crafted the language, is true, but not likely. We are in the initial three year measurement period with AZ. We are not even in compliance with the new balance. Once that happens what you state is true.
I may disagree with a new measurement period being down via MOU, but this language and how it is implemented is very complex. It involves the DAL marketing agreements with the other JV carriers and then them with us. What this team did was keep a even percentage of EASK's for our pilots. Yes, the corrective window will not happen for a few years, but the long term gains are significant. We have only seen a down side to the capacity since it was drafted, if there is ever an up side, we will profit handsomely. With the profit and loss of the Bundle 1 flying being shared equally, it gives incentives beyond the language in LOA 16 and MOU 14 to keep the flying as close to equal as possible. Each side gets a few city pairs they can opt out of each year, but as a whole the profit loss is shared, and therefore, the execs want the risk and exposure shared equally.
I did more than call the office. I talked to the person responsible for crafting this language face to face, and then via e-mail at length.
If we were at 0, 0 then 49.5 we would have bigger problems to deal with. Under the terms spelled out in MOU 14, once reaching 49.50 it is considered 50-50 and at that point a new measurement period starts. There is no look back for this scenario. They basically have three years to get there since we started at 47.2 with the addition of AZ. Some purport we could go to 0, 0 then be in compliance and that may true, but unrealistic. The bigger game is we get half of the EASK's available going forward.
What George mentions about there being no bottom end compliance right now is as far as I can tell, and as far as I have been told by those who crafted the language, is true, but not likely. We are in the initial three year measurement period with AZ. We are not even in compliance with the new balance. Once that happens what you state is true.
I may disagree with a new measurement period being down via MOU, but this language and how it is implemented is very complex. It involves the DAL marketing agreements with the other JV carriers and then them with us. What this team did was keep a even percentage of EASK's for our pilots. Yes, the corrective window will not happen for a few years, but the long term gains are significant. We have only seen a down side to the capacity since it was drafted, if there is ever an up side, we will profit handsomely. With the profit and loss of the Bundle 1 flying being shared equally, it gives incentives beyond the language in LOA 16 and MOU 14 to keep the flying as close to equal as possible. Each side gets a few city pairs they can opt out of each year, but as a whole the profit loss is shared, and therefore, the execs want the risk and exposure shared equally.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
deleted......
Last edited by tim123; 12-04-2011 at 12:05 PM. Reason: posted twice
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




