Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
If someone doesn't hurry up and make all this joint venture stuff with American into a football analogy real soon I'm going to start posting pictures of dudes...
its the only threat I know that is legit around here.
its the only threat I know that is legit around here.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
I dunno. This makes my wings flutter more then chocolate! Look at the head on that beer!

I know. I know. Most don't even notice there is a beer in that picture.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
From: 320A
So,complaining now does little good and is Monday morning quarterbacking.When are members suppose to talk about it?Before the neg comm signed it?Don't think we had the chance?Before mem rat?Don't think we had the chance.And now you say we shouldn't discuss it after the fact,so I guess you are saying we should just let ALPA run the show as a few people see fit.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
ALFA, (ACL and Carl too),
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
What Carl says pretty much parallels the analysis done by the Boyd Group. Here's a link:http://www.aviationplanning.com/Imag...%20Reality.pdf
You may disagree with Boyd's conclusions, but Carl is not "out in left field", so to speak, with his comments as you asserted so aggressively.
My prediction is rather than admit Carl was on to something you will follow the DALPA tactic of trying to discredit the messenger (Boyd).
Boyd's analysis shows AMR spending $700-800 million a year in interest expense which he touts as the largest non-operating cost. Delta has interest expense exceeding $1 billion per year. If American gets rid of 20% of their debt (which is probably unattainable, but I will be generous) they will reduce their interest expense about $140-160 million per year. They are going to lose $1,400 million this year. So get rid of the $150 million in interest and where does the rest of the $1,250 million or so come from? Labor? No way. That hole is too big. Their pension expense is about $500 million per year. Even if they terminate every defined benefit plan they still don't get there.
American's debt is pretty much in line with Delta's on a relative size basis. They will get some temporary relief in Ch 11. They can scrape off all of their teeny (less than 50 seat) rj's. They can get a little in lease costs and accelerating MD-80 retirements. They will get their piece of labor but it won't be $1 billion or more. I still see them having a giant hole in the P+L that can only be filled by more revenue.
What Boyd doesn't address is why Delta gained 11% PRASM and American is about half that at 5.8%. Carl doesn't address it either. Why are we able to pay for our rising fuel costs and American can't. That is not about debt that is about revenue. American has always been an industry leader in RASM performance and now they are close to last place. What has changed in the last five years to make that happen?
So I am not trashing Boyd, but his analysis is superficial and factually incorrect in many facets. How can Delta support a debt load and pension expense that is larger than American's (proportionally the same size) and yet be doing quite well? Is it really debt and pension, or are those just the things you can attack in Chapter 11? Without revenue gains those won't be enough to make American profitable.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
If you haven't received the pop up message yet, it's likely they haven't put it on your schedule yet. I'm going in January so I'm guessing they loaded it on there so I can bid accordingly.
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
So I am not trashing Boyd, but his analysis is superficial and factually incorrect in many facets. How can Delta support a debt load and pension expense that is larger than American's (proportionally the same size) and yet be doing quite well? Is it really debt and pension, or are those just the things you can attack in Chapter 11? Without revenue gains those won't be enough to make American profitable.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




