![]() |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1118157)
And, oh, btw, 89,760 enplanements for AK in ATL for 2011.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1118160)
DOT. That Alaska website number probably includes through, connection and codeshare pax, not unique pax enplanements. As I said, I haven't seen their numbers, but the company reported 7.8% mainline growth on the system for 2011.
DecemberYear-to-Date20112010Change20112010ChangeRevenue passengers (in thousands) 1,485 1,440 3.1% 17,810 16,514 7.8% |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1118163)
Did you read it? If so, you would know that it wasn't.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1118166)
Yeah, it sucked. Truth hurts.:p
PS I was furloughed when I wrote it. You were probably green slipping. |
Ok, break it up, break it up...
Let's not let this degrade into more personal attacks we'll all regret hey. We're discussing AK codeshare, and the numbers ARE interesting to compare to the real-life experience of folks in LAX on the 73. Either the numbers are BS, which is what it seems to folks dealing with the LAX73n bid package, or they are some version of the truth... in which case there must be some other changed factor we're not discussing that makes the numbers jive with the current terrible experience out there. We're not looking at that, and I'd expect it's the meat of the matter. Buzz maybe hit it with the idea of an increase of wide-body flying, maybe Japan stuff? that is MASKING a serious decrease in narrow-body flying, or at least quality of flying, out there. You know, it's possible there is truth in BOTH sides of this discussion, if you don't have to force an "either-or" answer. |
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1118170)
Yeah, New York Times best seller list for 6 months and 400,000 copies sold. It sucked. Apparently your opinion isn't so hot either.
PS I was furloughed when I wrote it. You were probably green slipping. Is the liquor cabinet pretty close to your keyboard?:D Why the cheap shots tonight? I reported facts as the DOT puts them out. I did a math problem that shows the AS website numbers have to include codeshare pax. You get all butt-hurt and start talking trash about greenslipping, apologists, etc. You're usually above this, but if this is how you want to play... where's FTB with a pig-wrestling picture?:p |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1118162)
Yeah, I shouldn't expect a guy who profited from a "kiss and tell" book to have an adult discussion.:mad:
Of course, getting angry and posting a mad face while personally attacking another poster isn't exactly an adult discussion, but we can roll with the punches here. Meaning Publicly retell of one's sexual exploits, often with the aim of revenge or monetary gain. Origin Kiss and tell is of course a euphemism - firstly, when stories of this sort arise we can take it for granted they will include details of more than just kissing. Also, if as is often the case now, they are printed in tabloid newspapers, sell would be a more appropriate word than tell. It might be thought to be a recent phenomenon, but it dates back to at least the late 17th century and appears in Congreve's play Love for Love, 1695: |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1118092)
I don't know, not a Dog in this fight but Brandon Jacobs is a freight truck and Manning plays well on the road- better than at home. The year they won the SB against probably the best NFL team ever they played on the road the entire playoffs. If its raining I think Manning can still pass, can Alex Smith? Because if there is no deep threat they'll crowd the line.
I think Patriots will steam roll BWI because even against a good defense they'll score 4 or so TDs while BWI seems to only score 20 or less. I'm betting Giants vs Patriots in a rematch. My bet, patriots, but manning sure has a way to win while looking like his uniform is 3 sizes too large. Should be a good one. |
Here is the LAX numbers from Welcome to Los Angeles World Airports - LAX Statistics
[TABLE DELETED] The last table I made up. It divided out the passengers by the same aircraft size. |
Originally Posted by Roadkill
(Post 1118173)
Ok, break it up, break it up...
Let's not let this degrade into more personal attacks we'll all regret hey. We're discussing AK codeshare, and the numbers ARE interesting to compare to the real-life experience of folks in LAX on the 73. Either the numbers are BS, which is what it seems to folks dealing with the LAX73n bid package, or they are some version of the truth... in which case there must be some other changed factor we're not discussing that makes the numbers jive with the current terrible experience out there. We're not looking at that, and I'd expect it's the meat of the matter. Buzz maybe hit it with the idea of an increase of wide-body flying, maybe Japan stuff? that is MASKING a serious decrease in narrow-body flying, or at least quality of flying, out there. You know, it's possible there is truth in BOTH sides of this discussion, if you don't have to force an "either-or" answer. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands