Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Your memory doesn't go back far enough. We used to do LGA-MSY on a 727.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
We also once did LGA-DFW on the 727. Clearing the berms at the end the runway at LGA was always a issue on that flight. Then one day they cut out the berms. Smart move. You could see all the grooves in them from tailskid hits.
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Actually the codeshare committee puts out a pretty good projection on what is happening with RJs, you'll find it on the DALPA site...
From the November 2011 codeshare committee PowerPoint presentation
Slide 3:
13 AC removed from Mainline fleet since the Aug 2011 MEC meeting
Slide 4:
8 MD90s added
Slide 9:
DCI fleet added 4 since Aug 2011 MEC report and 14 since the May 2011 report
Slide 21:
Peak DCI departures projected to exceed 60% of all Delta system departures in Dec 2013 before retreating again and reaching September 2011 levels by Sept 2016.
Again this isnt conjecture on my part, but the data presented by SM and RD of the DALPA codeshare comittee available at dal.alpa.org.
Cheers
George
From the November 2011 codeshare committee PowerPoint presentation
Slide 3:
13 AC removed from Mainline fleet since the Aug 2011 MEC meeting
Slide 4:
8 MD90s added
Slide 9:
DCI fleet added 4 since Aug 2011 MEC report and 14 since the May 2011 report
Slide 21:
Peak DCI departures projected to exceed 60% of all Delta system departures in Dec 2013 before retreating again and reaching September 2011 levels by Sept 2016.
Again this isnt conjecture on my part, but the data presented by SM and RD of the DALPA codeshare comittee available at dal.alpa.org.
Cheers
George
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
My point is it shouldn't have ever been an RJ in the first place. It should have always stayed mainline just like LGA-DFW. The loads used to be there when it was mainline. Now we have driven those away with RJ's.
Heck, AA used to fly DC-10s...FULL between DFW-LGA!
Market destruction is putting RJs on what used to be a full widebody route, or connecting MAJOR hubs with RJ only service then calling it feed. I dont care what anybody says, when I commute on a 50 seat RJ, it is uncomfortable... Poor mainline service beats great 50 seat service. Bigger than 50 seat should be a mainline aircraft.
I was extremely upset when the initial two rounds of routes came out and there were only 7 mainline routes listed. I guess I'm looking for the "silver" lining. Seems to be strangely lead colored however - that won't hurt me will it?
I gotta absolutely agree with you. Market development is something like CHS-BNA or ROC-ORF.
Market destruction is putting RJs on what used to be a full widebody route, or connecting MAJOR hubs with RJ only service then calling it feed. I dont care what anybody says, when I commute on a 50 seat RJ, it is uncomfortable... Poor mainline service beats great 50 seat service. Bigger than 50 seat should be a mainline aircraft.
Market destruction is putting RJs on what used to be a full widebody route, or connecting MAJOR hubs with RJ only service then calling it feed. I dont care what anybody says, when I commute on a 50 seat RJ, it is uncomfortable... Poor mainline service beats great 50 seat service. Bigger than 50 seat should be a mainline aircraft.
Of course, if you don't advertise, you can throw airplanes at a segment and when folks don't come cancel it and tell everyone how stupid they were. I guess network just hopes that word of mouth and the intraweb thingy will solve all of their problems.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post





