Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2012, 06:21 PM
  #88421  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Space Shuttle PIC
Posts: 2,007
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Mea Culpa. The merger is the third rail. You probably share our disgust with outsourcing and you are correct in the snapshot zombiepocolypse of 2008. When we were financing fuel at (what was it, 14%?) it did seem unlikely we would survive. So let me re-phrase the question:

Where's the bottom?

I forecast last fall would be the last big downbid, but now it appears the company is going to push at least 350 to staff the Douglas jets. Do you have any prognostications when things will turn around?
I would think the DC9 guys in MSP and maybe some in DTW would go to the MD88/90, since 21 are coming this year, and 8 next year, and the -9s are on the way out. A pay increase is included going from the -9 to the MD88 too. There may be some movement from some higher up positions, but that may give some senior guys the push to think about taking an early out if offered. Eventually those widebodies will all come back from the cabin and crew rest mods, and that will induce more upward movement.
Bill Lumberg is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:24 PM
  #88422  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2011
Posts: 114
Default

If they start to offer leave of two years or greater those Chinese contracts will look really good! Perhaps that's when they'll call it a furlough
CAAC ATP is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:28 PM
  #88423  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: A320 CA
Posts: 973
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
I would think the DC9 guys in MSP and maybe some in DTW would go to the MD88/90, since 21 are coming this year, and 8 next year, and the -9s are on the way out. A pay increase is included going from the -9 to the MD88 too. There may be some movement from some higher up positions, but that may give some senior guys the push to think about taking an early out if offered. Eventually those widebodies will all come back from the cabin and crew rest mods, and that will induce more upward movement.
I agree. Same type rating, esentially differences training.
reddog25 is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:29 PM
  #88424  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by PilotFrog
I prefer



Oh and no winners so it is up to $310M
That's nice and all and I used to be into the turbine mix but since the 88 I've come to appreciate the past. So for $310M...



I don't think I have to identify the thing now do I?

btw that peninsula will come with it. And so shall that mountain.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:33 PM
  #88425  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I'll take our retirement over theirs all day long, and twice on Sunday. It's not JUST about the W2, but what you have when you retire. I want more in the DC and 401k.. but it is better than a 9% match..
Now T, I know you know this... but consider the following. Which one would you rather have?

1) $234,000 W2 with the company putting a 9% match into your 401k.

or

2) $156,000 W2 with the company putting a 14% contribution (no match required) into your 401k.

Let's think about this for a minute.

In #1 - You have $234,000 in gross income. Let's assume taxes are 30%. In in order to get the 9% match, you have to contribute 9% of your $234,000 to your 401k. So $234K - 21,060 (9%) = $212,940. Take home pay (after taxes) on that is $149,058. You get a total of $42,120 in your 401k (the $21,060 you contributed plus the company match in the same amount).

In #2 - You have $156,000 in gross income. (That's what I made last year as a narrowbody domestic Captain.) Again, assume taxes are 30%. No match required, but you probably want to contribute to your 401k... so let's say you contribute 9% just like your SWA buddy did. So $156K - 14,040 (9%) = $141,960. Take home pay (after taxes) on that is $99,372. You get a total of $35,880 in your 401k (the $14,040 you contributed plus the company's 14% contribution).

So, let's summarize what we are netting in these two examples.

1) - Take home pay is $149,058. Contribution into 401k is $42,120.

2) - Take home pay is $99,372. Contribution into 401k is $35,880.

I wasn't a finance major, but I think I can figure out which one of these is a better deal.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:34 PM
  #88426  
Gets Weekends Off
 
georgetg's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Posts: 1,724
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Sorry Slow,

No way. For just about any Atlanta based pilot this merger has been a big shove backward. The further network consolidation is a continuation of a trend NWA had sustained since their exit and was a course reversal for Glen Hauenstein. We then made it worse by finishing what the NWA guys started with Compass.

The conglomerate might be a better Corporation, but there is no doubt we are liquidating our assets for short term gains. We are not investing sufficiently in the business. We are outsourcing our brand:If you don't see this, it is only because your educated bet that it will not catch up with you before you retire.
Bar, gotta side with slowplay on this one.

The merger has been beneficial to the current Delta pilots.

Let's go back to 2008, the company was willing to grease the skids to provide for a smooth merger. The stock options, incremental pay raises and no furloughs for 2 years were all benefits that have improved things for the pilots on the seniority list. None of that came for free and some items like incorporating the AS codeshare from the NWA contract are what we gave the company in return. Our cooperation was worth money and the company delivered.

The merger happened at a time when record fuel prices left most airlines pretty unprepared. Since then great strides have been made by Delta and others to reduce fuel price volatility and associated risk along with passing on some of the increased fuel cost to the pax.

Fast forward 4 years and the merger has been very successful for the company, both operationally and financial. The EF&A team predicted that 2012 would offer a much better financial environment for contract negotiations and thus warranted and extension.

All of the financial predictions have been spot on and Delta has had 2 consecutive years with full year profit exceeding $1B. What Delta has not delivered is the equivalent of shareholder value for the pilot group: seniority advancement. Because we have a Seniority based system that's an inherent promise and the frustration coming from the ranks is a direct result of the failure to deliver on seniority advancement.

I'm "happy to have a job", but I didn't sign up for a job, I signed up for a career at Delta.

If we can't turn 2 consecutive years of record profits during trying economic times into pay and seniority gains, then there is not much hope moving forward.

Cheers
George
georgetg is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:37 PM
  #88427  
At home on the maddog!
 
DAL 88 Driver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: ATL MD-88A
Posts: 2,874
Default

Originally Posted by reddog25
I agree. Same type rating, esentially differences training.
Differences training + FMS + a Digital Flight Guidance System. And a lot of procedures that are different from the old "north" way to the way Delta operates the 88.

Not disagreeing with you. I suspect a lot of the DC-9 guys will go to the 88. Just pointing out that the transition is not quite as simple as differences training.
DAL 88 Driver is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:47 PM
  #88428  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: 320A
Posts: 333
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop
Cubdrick,

We should get rid of trip parking but lets be clear about 1 thing - trip parking is currently 100% legal. I think it sucks, but lets face it, guys are exploiting a loophole in the contract to their personal advantage.

Calling them abusers and publishing a list is not the right answer - closing the loophole is.

.

Scoop
Originally Posted by Check Essential
It is using the "Swap with Friends" function to get around the normal contractual line value limits of ALV+15.

The PCS method of swapping and white-slipping trips will not allow a pilot to exceed the contract limit. "Swap with Friends" WILL allow the contract violation.
When a regular line holder wants to add a trip to his line from open time that would take him over the limit he asks a "friend" with an opening on his schedule to temporarily pick-up (park) a trip from his schedule so he can then white slip the trip that would otherwise violate the contract. Then he takes his original "parked" trip back from his "friend".

It is a blatant contract violation but it has not been enforced and therefore has legally become "past practice".
Managment loves it because they don't have to award green slips and they can run the airline with fewer pilots. It hurts all of us who don't want to work 120 hours at straight pay and would like to advance to a higher paying category.

Applause to DALPA for fixing it. I hope they write that "all pilot" letter to put a damper on it this summer before the computer programming is complete.
What's the opinion of others..legal or illegal?
tim123 is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:50 PM
  #88429  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,520
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
It sure looks like a P-51...
Yes. Look at 3:44. It's a P-51, Cavalier build I'd guess from the tail profile.
Boomer is offline  
Old 02-09-2012, 06:51 PM
  #88430  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
I'll take our retirement over theirs all day long, and twice on Sunday. It's not JUST about the W2, but what you have when you retire. I want more in the DC and 401k.. but it is better than a 9% match..
Very short sighted thinking IMO. You'd walk away from SWAPA's scope because of a few percent differential between their DC and ours?

Hope you enjoy those few extra % points as you continue to go backwards due to outsourcing.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22594
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices