Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 02-23-2012 | 05:42 AM
  #90121  
MDPilot's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: B717A
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
CFIT footage:



Jeb Corliss is insane but he makes it look good

Cheers
George

More info: (from AVWeb)


Professional base jumper Jeb Corliss is due out of the hospital Friday and Tuesday released comprehensive video of the accident that broke both his legs and came within feet of taking his life when he clipped a rock formation at roughly 180 mph. The accident happened last month while Corliss was filming a jump for a TV documentary at Table Mountain in South Africa. Corliss cleared the rock formation with his upper body, but his legs hit. The contact significantly changed Corliss' trajectory causing him to nearly tumble but he quickly recovered and deployed his parachute. Multiple cameras placed on the ground, on a trailing wingsuiter and on Corliss himself captured the flight and the impact.


After landing under canopy, Corliss was recovered and airlifted to Christiaan Barnaard Hospital in Cape Town. A spokesperson for the hospital said Corliss' injuries required extensive surgery, and skin grafts that have kept him in the hospital under observation
Old 02-23-2012 | 05:47 AM
  #90122  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by siemprerojo
From the crew lounge yesterday in SLC:

Keeping DC-9's till end of 2013

Next AE, first week of March, DC-9's and MD-90 will be funded by 777, 747 and Domestic 767.

We are over by 200 pilots summer 2012.

Wow didn't know that 50% of this base "chooses" to commute.

Hiring to start 2013 and to go indefinitely. The presenter is in charge of hiring and is worried about getting enough pilots in the pipeline in order to not over tax the simulator availability. He is concerned about keeping up the quality of pilots.

They would rather hire to fill the DC-9 and MD-90 this year but Richard won't go for it.

Commentary: In general, we are doing everything to reduce our debt and improve our product (lie flat seats). I am happy about that as I'd rather work for a profitable company than one losing money. But I am banking on my union to help my career and my wife's career along (scope, JV, etc.). Understandably the company is worried about making a profit and not too worried about our stagnation. I'm looking to my union to get our flying back and I've written to my reps and negotiators in that regard.
Good thing that bigger pays MORE....
Old 02-23-2012 | 06:12 AM
  #90123  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by siemprerojo
From the crew lounge yesterday in SLC:

Keeping DC-9's till end of 2013

Next AE, first week of March, DC-9's and MD-90 will be funded by 777, 747 and Domestic 767.

We are over by 200 pilots summer 2012.

Wow didn't know that 50% of this base "chooses" to commute.

Hiring to start 2013 and to go indefinitely. The presenter is in charge of hiring and is worried about getting enough pilots in the pipeline in order to not over tax the simulator availability. He is concerned about keeping up the quality of pilots.

They would rather hire to fill the DC-9 and MD-90 this year but Richard won't go for it.

Commentary: In general, we are doing everything to reduce our debt and improve our product (lie flat seats). I am happy about that as I'd rather work for a profitable company than one losing money. But I am banking on my union to help my career and my wife's career along (scope, JV, etc.). Understandably the company is worried about making a profit and not too worried about our stagnation. I'm looking to my union to get our flying back and I've written to my reps and negotiators in that regard.
Why hire if you are going to acquire something? If it is not an asset purchase, employees come with.
Old 02-23-2012 | 06:15 AM
  #90124  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ
Thanks for the update! Are the training events generated by these widebody displacements seriously less expensive than paying a guy first year pay on the 88/90/DC9 now? I would guess with healthcare and retirement that a new hire costs the company 60-80k the first year. 747-330-764-7ER-73N-M88-DC9 would be six training events. Do we qual a guy on a new jet for less than $10k?

And I'm only coming at this from the economic standpoint of the Company. I'm not even considering the "respect" and "constructive engagement" they are giving up by turning life upside down for six of their "highly valued" pilots and their families. I don't see how it's worth holding off hiring for one year. (Unless that hiring is an empty promise, which I've come to expect).

True, and what we may see is a massive displacement to manage expectations right before we see an all in offer from the company. This bid could be a 365 since the last one was last years 365 bid, and as a result most of the training would not start until fall. As a result would allow them to reverse much of it with a subsequent AE, and then start hiring pilots a few months early, and or acquire someone and quickly kill the overlap thus resulting in no need for bodies.
Old 02-23-2012 | 06:59 AM
  #90125  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
True, and what we may see is a massive displacement to manage expectations right before we see an all in offer from the company. This bid could be a 365 since the last one was last years 365 bid, and as a result most of the training would not start until fall. As a result would allow them to reverse much of it with a subsequent AE, and then start hiring pilots a few months early, and or acquire someone and quickly kill the overlap thus resulting in no need for bodies.
Pretty hard not to see around those two corners ACL. Time will tell.
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:05 AM
  #90126  
SFWB's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
From: Mecca320B
Default

Originally Posted by capncrunch
I'm not trying to be argumentative and I appreciate your candor and constructive criticism, with that in mind, here is another question. Wouldn't management's goal always be 50% + 1? In other words, why would management want to do anything more than the minimum even if we were "unified"?

Also, the whole "ununified" thing has me miffed as well. I see us as unified in that we all want a great contract, we just disagree about how to get there. Either way, it does not matter since DALPA will still be the one doing the negotiations. I guess I'm at a loss on the "ununified" thing.
I agree with the Unified in that we all want a great contract. I don't care who negotiates it.
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:12 AM
  #90127  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ
Thanks for the update! Are the training events generated by these widebody displacements seriously less expensive than paying a guy first year pay on the 88/90/DC9 now? I would guess with healthcare and retirement that a new hire costs the company 60-80k the first year. 747-330-764-7ER-73N-M88-DC9 would be six training events. Do we qual a guy on a new jet for less than $10k?

And I'm only coming at this from the economic standpoint of the Company. I'm not even considering the "respect" and "constructive engagement" they are giving up by turning life upside down for six of their "highly valued" pilots and their families. I don't see how it's worth holding off hiring for one year. (Unless that hiring is an empty promise, which I've come to expect).
When I went through training someone said that it costs the company 60K to put us through from indoc to OE. So I'm with you on this one, the training events would cost the same. But then again, after the training events they wont have the additional pilots whose salaries they have to pay and health care, 401k, etc. so maybe it is costlier to hire. Too bad RA wouldn't go for more hiring would be nice to have people behind me and not have to go to the DC9.
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:15 AM
  #90128  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
Pretty hard not to see around those two corners ACL. Time will tell.

Agreed.






.
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:17 AM
  #90129  
Dirtdiver's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 791
Likes: 0
From: 767A
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ
Thanks for the update! Are the training events generated by these widebody displacements seriously less expensive than paying a guy first year pay on the 88/90/DC9 now? I would guess with healthcare and retirement that a new hire costs the company 60-80k the first year. 747-330-764-7ER-73N-M88-DC9 would be six training events. Do we qual a guy on a new jet for less than $10k?

And I'm only coming at this from the economic standpoint of the Company. I'm not even considering the "respect" and "constructive engagement" they are giving up by turning life upside down for six of their "highly valued" pilots and their families. I don't see how it's worth holding off hiring for one year. (Unless that hiring is an empty promise, which I've come to expect).
Somehow our management is always surprised how many training events a displacement creates. They shouldn't be, it happens every time.

As we speak, they're projecting how that 777 FO is going to take that narrowbody capt slot. One training event, piece of cake.

What was that Einstein quote? Insanity is repeating the same thing expecting a different result.
Old 02-23-2012 | 07:37 AM
  #90130  
TenYearsGone's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 2,039
Likes: 0
From: 7ERB
Default

Originally Posted by siemprerojo
From the crew lounge yesterday in SLC:

Keeping DC-9's till end of 2013

Next AE, first week of March, DC-9's and MD-90 will be funded by 777, 747 and Domestic 767.

We are over by 200 pilots summer 2012.

Wow didn't know that 50% of this base "chooses" to commute.

Hiring to start 2013 and to go indefinitely. The presenter is in charge of hiring and is worried about getting enough pilots in the pipeline in order to not over tax the simulator availability. He is concerned about keeping up the quality of pilots.

They would rather hire to fill the DC-9 and MD-90 this year but Richard won't go for it.

Commentary: In general, we are doing everything to reduce our debt and improve our product (lie flat seats). I am happy about that as I'd rather work for a profitable company than one losing money. But I am banking on my union to help my career and my wife's career along (scope, JV, etc.). Understandably the company is worried about making a profit and not too worried about our stagnation. I'm looking to my union to get our flying back and I've written to my reps and negotiators in that regard.
So many mixed messages..Could a contract opener becoming up???

Anyway it is my duty as an APC fellow member to pass on a couple of "things" i have heard from the little black bird. Maybe they are false, maybe they are true. Who knows, but ill pass them on to you.

1) RA wants 777s. (Ive said this before-a handful)-->Cargo meeting about 6 weeks ago. This was said.
2) Check guy told me that there will be a big announcement in APRIL (didnt know what )
3) HE also stated that it is in the books-->We need to start hiring 500/year for up to 5000. The start date is 2015. WOAH!!!

Thats all--from the "onion" I bid you Guten Morgan!

TEN
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices