Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:22 AM
  #90301  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I'd be forced out 10 minutes after I signed a non disclosure clause and then wikileaked everything to the masses like it was going out of style.
That's an awesome stump speech and platform!

You got my vote!
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:24 AM
  #90302  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
LOL. Got it. Understand. We need guys like you. You are inherently right on the mark. You lead, I'll follow.
Agreed. Transparency of the process is what will get the majority to trust again.
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:39 AM
  #90303  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
Interesting Friday Night at the fights.

A couple opinions from an observer:
1) alfaromeo is denying that the sky is blue when he tries to minimize the role that ALPA and our contractual scope language plays in Delta's fleet decisions and their other joint venture and code-share arrangements. DALPA and management have been "constructively engaged" in outsourcing for a long time now. Moak truly believe(s)(d) that RJs saved Delta. Same goes for international alliances and revenue sharing in its various forms.
ALPA has clearly been a co-conspirator in outsourcing.
I hope they've realized the error and will reverse that policy going forward.

2) Bucking Bar often speaks as if ALPA can unilaterally mix and match pilot groups and seniority lists with relative ease and management and the government will just go along with whatever the union wants to do in that regard. He makes it sound like we could all be on one list and "unity" could be instantly achieved if only the people in charge of ALPA would stop standing in the way.
The fact is that the NMB and only the NMB decides who is in which bargaining units and if management does not merge the companies involved and cooperate with combining seniority lists then it is nearly impossible for ALPA to merge the pilot groups. If ALPA hadn't killed the ASA/Comair attempt to join DALPA then management surely would have. And they'd have done it easily. The whole PID controversy and other ALPA proceedings were just an academic exercise.

And I have to agree with DALPA's decision on Compass. Theoretically, Bar is obviously correct. Unity would be great. But absent a merger, it would be completely unworkable for the same MEC to represent two different pilot groups with competing interests and management had no intention of ever merging Compass into mainline.
ALPA has significantly less power than Bucking Bar implies when it comes to achieving this elusive "unity" among the various pilot groups. Management likes their ability to whipsaw and stopping it is going to be incredibly difficult.
Check,

Excellent post. We should expect our union to make its best effort for unity. It would be tremendously difficult, but it is the fight we must undertake if our union is going to be relevant (or even in existence) in the future.

Management is expected to act like management. When we negotiate scope relaxation and see Air France and Delta readjust flying beyond the 50/50 split taking an unfair advantage of what ALPA allowed, then I expect the union to complain. When perhaps several thousand Delta pilots get displaced in a waterfall as a result, I expect ALPA to rise up and start making a very public stink about the outsourcing that costs Americans' jobs.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 02-25-2012 at 05:53 AM.
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:43 AM
  #90304  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Gloppy
I fully expect management to ask for at least 255 more rj's to a 88 seat limit. (C-Seiries in a dual class config fwiw. That's what AMR is asking for and brcause of the C-Series jet). If they opt not to it is because they know what that openi g position will do to the majority of pilots. With AMR asking it makes it increasingly likely that UAL and DAL will put for the same proposal. We all have to stand strong on that issue.
They're wasting their time and our time with that one!
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:48 AM
  #90305  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
I'd be forced out 10 minutes after I signed a non disclosure clause and then wikileaked everything to the masses like it was going out of style.
We should initiate a resolution that bans ALPA officials from signing those non-disclosure agreements. Nothing good comes from them.
Management uses the selective disclosure of "proprietary" info to manipulate our union.
Old 02-25-2012 | 05:58 AM
  #90306  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
I'll take a shot with a 777 DTW dart. There are a number of pilots who live in ATL who commute to DTW to fly. A number of these pilots have been interested in bidding back to ATL, but have not been able to.

My prediction: DTW 777 FOs will bid to ATL 777 and A 330. Additionally, VDs from DTW 777B went senior on the last bid - further demonstrating the pent up desire to bid out. IOW, my guess is that none of them will bid the 88, half of the FOs can hold the 73n, 320, 767, 7er, 330 and 777 left seat.

FTB, here's your chance to be an 88A.
This was not meant to imply in any way that I/we do not want small jets at the mainline.
Old 02-25-2012 | 06:05 AM
  #90307  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Management is expected to act like management. When we negotiate scope relaxation and see Air France and Delta readjust flying beyond the 50/50 split taking an unfair advantage of what ALPA allowed, then I expect the union to complain. When perhaps several thousand Delta pilots get displaced in a waterfall as a result, I expect ALPA to rise up and start making a very public stink about the outsourcing that costs Americans' jobs.
Bar-
I agree 100%.
It is absolutely baffling that ALPA keeps facilitating the destruction of our jobs.
Old 02-25-2012 | 06:28 AM
  #90308  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by buzzpat
LOL. Got it. Understand. We need guys like you. You are inherently right on the mark. You lead, I'll follow.
Carl too!!

Carl
Old 02-25-2012 | 06:42 AM
  #90309  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Check,

Excellent post. We should expect our union to make its best effort for unity. It would be tremendously difficult, but it is the fight we must undertake if our union is going to be relevant (or even in existence) in the future.

Management is expected to act like management. When we negotiate scope relaxation and see Air France and Delta readjust flying beyond the 50/50 split taking an unfair advantage of what ALPA allowed, then I expect the union to complain.
But they didn't complain Bar. And worse, it was our own union that unilaterally signed off on increasing the AF/KLM unbalance allowance to 3 years. When are you going to want to actually DO something about this behavior...instead of just accurately describing it??

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
When perhaps several thousand Delta pilots get displaced in a waterfall as a result, I expect ALPA to rise up and start making a very public stink about the outsourcing that costs Americans' jobs.
But they haven't, have they Bar. Not even an inflatable rat.

What to DO about this...what to DO?

Carl
Old 02-25-2012 | 07:08 AM
  #90310  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
We should initiate a resolution that bans ALPA officials from signing those non-disclosure agreements. Nothing good comes from them.
Management uses the selective disclosure of "proprietary" info to manipulate our union.
Totally agree. More importantly, these NDA's distance us from our own union through a reduction in the ability to communicate. Whatever small good that may occasionally be gotten from them are far outweighed by the bad IMO.

Carl
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices