![]() |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1168171)
I wondered the same thing. The mod who closed it wouldn't give a reason for shutting it down. I think the media is catching wind of this, no pun intended, because I saw a preview on cable this morning that talked about "showboating" pilots being a factor. The media will eat this one up if they get a hold of it.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1168210)
True,
But an airline needs jet fuel to operate. An airline does not need hotels and car rental companies. So while there is some validity in your comparison there are some distinct differences also. Scoop |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1168235)
Didn't NWA used to own the Narita layover hotel?
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1168211)
No, fortunately you cannot. Hopefully that never changes either.
And don't give me that crap about seniority jumping outta base. Every senior pilot would have the choice to bid out of base to do the same thing. It's just a gamble. If you choose to gamble with your seniority you should be able to. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1168215)
True, but I really do think this is different. Fuel is the number 1 cost item. $.01 results in a $40 million change in costs one way or the other. (if I have that correct) So if the $.10 advantage in fuel prices is legitimate, that is huge.
I just finished listening to Jon Ruggles' podcast interview from August. If you listen to that, listen to what he says right at the 7 minute mark. It is very interesting. Most of his interview is quite esoteric in nature, but you can definitely tell he knows what he is talking about, especially as it relates to the airline. Towards the end he even talks about how the fleet works. I am glad he is our guy. Prior to this Delta's fuel strategy has been using so called collars, a type of hedge that limits upward and downward exposure while limiting expense. The refinery takes this one step further. It doesn't matter what comes out of the refinery and I doubt much if any "jet fuel" will ever make it from that refinery into a Delta jet. It's more about having a tool to fine tune hedges minimizing risk and maximizing yield. No other player in the oil trading space, absent hedges, benefits from a market downturn the way Delta does. Now can we please hire some Wall Street guy to tell Delta to become just as vertically integrated and bring more flying in-house... Cheers George |
Originally Posted by iceman49
(Post 1168187)
Or it could turn out like UAL/PAA owning hotels and rental car companies.
|
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1168275)
The refinery takes this one step further. It doesn't matter what comes out of the refinery and I doubt much if any "jet fuel" will ever make it from that refinery into a Delta jet. It's more about having a tool to fine tune hedges minimizing risk and maximizing yield.
Cheers George |
Originally Posted by Delta1067
(Post 1168235)
Didn't NWA used to own the Narita layover hotel?
|
Originally Posted by Ferd149
(Post 1168283)
I think they're different things. Hotels and rental cars are attempts to expand your business opportunities with the danger of getting too far outside your core business. The refinery is an attempt to control your supply chain. It's definitely thinking outside the box. We either end up with a refinery or the speculators get nervous and look for other opportunities............or we get our a$$ kicked:D
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1168210)
True,
But an airline needs jet fuel to operate. An airline does not need hotels and car rental companies. So while there is some validity in your comparison there are some distinct differences also. Scoop Compare and contrast priceline and many others to the massive day trader paper mark up crowd that's now threatening to cull refining capacity to put even more upwards pressure on gas. This seems like a really smart idea in theory, if its done right. Even then, and especially if others follow suit, that could deal a big blow to at least the crack spread portion of the insane petroleum mark ups. If it does, even a well run refinery could appear to be a money loser at that point...but that's probably part of the goal. If it depresses the end price of jet-A to the point that the refinery itself isn't making money or even losing money, then by default we're getting jet fuel a lot cheaper. Then it will be a constant struggle to stay the course because the quarterly bonus monger hatchet men will see an opportunity to get rid of an isolated paper loss on the balance sheet today for a nice quarterly result tomorrow and then back to where we are now with the over all gas manipulation mark ups. The same logic that says to pull flights out of any market you're not "making money on". While that sounds great, it puts you in the position that any competitor can seat dump/cherry pick anything in your network they want to and as long as it hurts your performance you bail. You have to stick to those markets, and sometimes even double down and make them bleed more, because to instantly submit and yield market share at a competitors discretion is exactly how today's cutsey start up LCC in endless growth mode with a massive fantasy order book ends up becoming tomorrow's SWA. The refinery thing could be a good long term deal, if its done right, even if the nose of wall street doesn't like the perceived line item profit lines its snorting that quarter. Being done right is a pretty big if though. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands