Details on Delta TA
09-04-2014 | 04:27 AM
#1401
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
I do not believe that increasing max reserves costs jobs. To the extent that such an increase causes reserve pilots on an aircraft to work on average even one more minute than they did before, the staffing formula immediately begins to require more pilots on that aircraft.
[/LIST]
[/LIST]
So going from 40 to 41 minutes on average is still far from 60 but now it's fewer pilots required not because pilots are now flying to 99 hours but because they're flying entire trips that once could not have been assigned to them.
Now with the threat of guys timing out gone you need far less coverage.
09-04-2014 | 04:34 AM
#1402
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
I do not believe that increasing max reserves costs jobs. To the extent that such an increase causes reserve pilots on an aircraft to work on average even one more minute than they did before, the staffing formula immediately begins to require more pilots on that aircraft.
But I agree with the rest of your statement. Moving days in the summer bid months and going to an 84-hour ALV did cost 100 or so jobs (assuming no change in block hours), according to the roadshow materials, by distributing the work among that many fewer pilots. The flip side then is that you have less overstaffing in the winter months, which means two things:
But I agree with the rest of your statement. Moving days in the summer bid months and going to an 84-hour ALV did cost 100 or so jobs (assuming no change in block hours), according to the roadshow materials, by distributing the work among that many fewer pilots. The flip side then is that you have less overstaffing in the winter months, which means two things:
- Fewer pilots are forced to reserve during those months (good for QOL)
- Reserve pilots work more during those months (not so good for QOL)
09-04-2014 | 04:38 AM
#1403
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
The 5.15 is huge.
The 5.15 was supposed to come with CDOs as an offset, the fact that got dropped was huge. The fact it was put forward... is indicative of "what are you going to give up to get that?"
WAYGTGUTGT... how about shorter, just GUT.
The 5.15 was supposed to come with CDOs as an offset, the fact that got dropped was huge. The fact it was put forward... is indicative of "what are you going to give up to get that?"
WAYGTGUTGT... how about shorter, just GUT.
09-04-2014 | 04:43 AM
#1404
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
The CDO's were something put forth by the union. The company especially with the restrictions we set up was not all that enamored with them. I was told that the 5:15 was costed out at 40 million. The CDO's at about 2 million.
09-04-2014 | 05:12 AM
#1405
Works Every Weekend
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
The big reason the company gave us the 5:15 was to solve the FAR 117 reserve long call issues.
They knew the infamous "Dickson memo" was a bluff and more and more guys were eventually going to call that bluff.
09-04-2014 | 05:37 AM
#1406
At home on the maddog!
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2,874
Likes: 0
From: Retired (mandatory age 65)
I'm keeping up just fine, thank you. Alfa was touting how great we did in C2012. I just put his beloved data into perspective.
09-04-2014 | 05:46 AM
#1407
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Your also leaving out the early raise of 4%. As of the amendable date the actual raise including the profit sharing reduction was about 10.8% for lineholders on most equipment. There was a additional raise for the 88's and reserves saw another 8 Percent raise. In addition the average pilot saw 10 to 12 hours more vacation and training pay for about 1 percent more in W2. Raise at signing was a minimum of 11.8 at the bottom to 20.8 for a mad dog reserve at the high end assuming the airline made at least 2.5 billion in pre tax profit. That includes the reduction in profit sharing.
09-04-2014 | 05:48 AM
#1408
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Apparently, you're not. He was simply countering Carl's incessant cost-neutral argument. There was nothing in his post stating that the overall deal was good or bad, simply that it increased pilot costs to Delta.
09-04-2014 | 05:49 AM
#1409
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
09-04-2014 | 05:51 AM
#1410
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
