![]() |
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1731930)
I don't think I need to be an expert on the contract to opine that saying "restoration" isn't a useful tactic, strategy, or whatever those espousing it choose to call it. I have been through a section 6 negotiation recently and frequently spoke with the negotiators and reps. The name of the game is maintaining an appearance of negotiating in good faith. I took the actual number of days I flew last year. I figure on the MD-88/90 the average number of legs per day is 3. The MD-88 holds 149 PAX and the MD-90 holds 160. Our loads are pretty full most of the time, so I used 145 as the average passenger load. Then, I looked at my December 31 pay stub. I added Flight Pay, Flight Advance, Profit Sharing, Shared Rewards, and company contributions into my retirement accounts... basically total compensation for the year. Then I divided that number by the number of passengers I carried. My total cost to Delta per passenger? $2.98. So... obviously it's more than just me up there. And some airplanes have higher paid Captains and more than two pilots. So let's say for illustration purposes that the average cockpit cost per passenger is $7. To increase our W2's to the same level of buying power we had during most of the 1980's, 1990's, and early 2000's, we would need approximately a 50% increase. Using $7 as our average cockpit cost per passenger, that's an additional $3.50 Delta would need to net per passenger. Delta invented $25 bag fees out of thin air and has no trouble collecting them. I have no doubt that they could find a way to net (whether through revenue increases or cost cuts in other areas or some combination) $3.50 more per passenger if they needed to. Where there's a will there's a way. Our management proves this every single day. They are very good at thinking outside the box. So, is "restoration" reasonable? Would we be negotiating "in good faith?" Clearly, I think so. I think there is a strong case to be made for that. Trouble is, nobody is making that case on our behalf. :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
(Post 1731982)
I agree that it would put much more of my pay at risk, but I'm willing to take that risk if it gets me back to C2K plus inflation whenever Delta is making the kind of profits it made leading up to C2K.
That said, I've not thoroughly run the numbers on this. Are you saying that with C2K profit margins, which is where we are apparently projected to be this year with a $4B PTIX, tripling our anticipated profit sharing won't get us full restoration? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1731746)
Oberon-
You're a noob (nothing wrong with that... we've all been there), and if you've been paying attention and know the contract history you'd have some valid input. Yet you've openly admitted that you don't know nor understand what has been going on with our contracts and negotiations all while preaching like you know it all. Then on top of that, you say you don't even know who your reps are. Really? Might want to tone it down a bit. Your credibility is absolutely shot at this point. A little more listening and a lot less know-it-all preaching is in order. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1731944)
What irritates some here Oberon is, you never lost anything in Delta's bankrutpcy, so YOU have no dog in the Restoration fight.
Neither do half the ones on here that are screaming for it either, Timbo. Sailed with Matt yesterday.. You should come out with us sometime and do some real sailing. Rum and everything at the finish. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1731565)
Did the company grant concessions when it took from Delta pilots in bankruptcy?
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1731990)
I just know that if I tripled last year's profit sharing check, it wouldn't bring my W2 up to C2K level buying power.
Wouldn't that plus some kind of hourly pay increase, more vacation, etc., at least get us close? |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1731994)
Neither do half the ones on here that are screaming for it either, Timbo.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1731994)
Neither do half the ones on here that are screaming for it either, Timbo.
|
Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver
(Post 1731989)
Delta invented $25 bag fees out of thin air and has no trouble collecting them. I have no doubt that they could find a way to net (whether through revenue increases or cost cuts in other areas or some combination) $3.50 more per passenger if they needed to. Where there's a will there's a way. Our management proves this every single day. They are very good at thinking outside the box. So, is "restoration" reasonable? Would we be negotiating "in good faith?" Clearly, I think so. I think there is a strong case to be made for that. Trouble is, nobody is making that case on our behalf. :rolleyes: |
Bing"f'en"O,Timbo!
+777-300ER
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1731944)
What irritates some here Oberon is, you never lost anything in Delta's bankrutpcy, so YOU have no dog in the Restoration fight.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:06 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands