Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

Herkflyr 09-22-2014 06:32 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1731960)
Yeah, take C12 and add 4,8,3,3 to it...

You mean "13, 3, 3?"

Because the "4" was six months prior to the amenable date, and the "8" was on the amenable date, which is something other pilot groups rarely if ever get. Compounded on top of each other we got a 13% pay raise by the amenable date of the contract.

4/8/3/3 gets tossed about by guys so much they post it as some pejorative term. But "13/3/3" doesn't sound quite so "bad."

That said, I wouldn't vote for "13/3/3" in today's negotiating environment. We deserve more.

DAL 88 Driver 09-22-2014 06:34 AM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1732004)
Agreed. But I don't believe that Delta made as much money last year as they had in the late 90's leading up to C2K in adjusted dollars. We're just now there this year. I heard at the roadshow recently that we're on track to almost double the profit sharing we got last year.

Wouldn't that plus some kind of hourly pay increase, more vacation, etc., at least get us close?

Well yeah... obviously there's some level of hourly pay increase, more vacation pay, etc. that would not only "get us close" but would completely close the gap. It would have to be more than 4833. I still don't want too high a percentage of our pay "at risk."

DAL 88 Driver 09-22-2014 06:38 AM


Originally Posted by Free Bird (Post 1732012)
Maybe ma Delta should implement a "pilot fee" and stick that on the price of a ticket. Either that or they should just let us hold out a tip jar.

I like the tip jar idea! :D Imagine if they tipped each of us the same way they'd tip a waiter for say a $15 meal. 3 bucks a piece and I've doubled my pay from last year! :eek:

Alan Shore 09-22-2014 06:40 AM


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1732024)
I still don't want too high a percentage of our pay "at risk."

I hear you. I'm just thinking that the more risk I'm willing to take, the greater the potential returns. Whenever I look with envy at the raises enjoyed by upper management, I am always reminded of just how much of that pay is at risk, too.

There's probably an acceptable balance in there somewhere. ;)

Alan Shore 09-22-2014 06:42 AM


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 1732022)
You mean "13, 3, 3?"

More like 11, 3, 3, as the other two was simply a profit sharing conversion.


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 1732022)
That said, I wouldn't vote for "13/3/3" in today's negotiating environment. We deserve more.

Agreed.

scambo1 09-22-2014 06:43 AM


Originally Posted by Herkflyr (Post 1732022)
You mean "13, 3, 3?"

Because the "4" was six months prior to the amenable date, and the "8" was on the amenable date, which is something other pilot groups rarely if ever get. Compounded on top of each other we got a 13% pay raise by the amenable date of the contract.

4/8/3/3 gets tossed about by guys so much they post it as some pejorative term. But "13/3/3" doesn't sound quite so "bad."

That said, I wouldn't vote for "13/3/3" in today's negotiating environment. We deserve more.

Herk,

If you voted for it in '12, you'd vote for it again today.

"Deserve" what a lame word choice.

I'm not trying to make this personal, but really.

For all the regular yes voters out there, the difference between a yes and a no is that with a no, you actually push the no button. The universe will not separate at the seams when this is done.

Everybody should fill out the survey, stay engaged with their reps, study whatever TA is put in front of us...but if the TA deserves a "no", then for cryin' out loud, push no.

DAL 88 Driver 09-22-2014 06:43 AM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1732030)
I hear you. I'm just thinking that the more risk I'm willing to take, the greater the potential returns. Whenever I look with envy at the raises enjoyed by upper management, I am always reminded of just how much of that pay is at risk, too.

There's probably an acceptable balance in there somewhere. ;)

Yep. I agree. Although it should be pointed out that taking more risk does not necessarily mean greater potential returns. That's one of the fundamental principles I rely on for my investing. Risk should always be managed carefully.

Elliot 09-22-2014 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by DAL 88 Driver (Post 1732029)
I like the tip jar idea! :D Imagine if they tipped each of us the same way they'd tip a waiter for say a $15 meal. 3 bucks a piece and I've doubled my pay from last year! :eek:

The airborne "tip jar" is coming again, in just ten short days. It's known as Breast Cancer Awareness month at Delta. Some of the flight attendant's get a little much when begging for donations from paying passengers.
GJ

DAL 88 Driver 09-22-2014 06:44 AM


Originally Posted by Alan Shore (Post 1732031)
More like 11, 3, 3, as the other two was simply a profit sharing conversion.



Subtract 2% per year for inflation, and that becomes 911! :eek:

tsquare 09-22-2014 06:52 AM


Originally Posted by Doug Masters (Post 1732008)
That is true, however I kinda disagree. I'm an '07 hire which means I haven't lost anything in the BK. However, I came here (from another major btw) with the expectation that at some point we could be back to pre BK wages. So while I may not have a "dog" in the fight, that doesn't mean I shouldn't want restoration. Hope that made sense.

Absolutely. I think the term "restoration" however is meaningless. I prefer to look forward and not back. If I had just learned to hit a hanging curveball I wouldn't be talking to any of youse guys.
You doing OK after this weekend? ouch.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands