|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1900409)
What is?......
Certainly not an emotional response like sending in DPA cards. good grief. But I am sure that has a lot of people quaking in their boots.:rolleyes: Let the process work (hopefully) If we don't get the product we think we should have then reps need to be recalled and all that stuff. I think it would be an enormous mistake to go independent. For example: You think dpa could deliver a scope clause like swa? Seriously? (I don't think they are going to be able to keep the one they have either btw) You and I better get our resumes dusted off if dpa were successful though, and at least you better get used to the idea of being in a mad dog right seat.. Or C2K + inflation? On day 1? rotflmao. All puff and no substance is what it is. jmho, ymmv |
The PTIX proposed changes also call for including executives in the employee pay pool. That dilutes our share of the PS pie significantly.
You won't see a slide or a talking point from Shinner with that nugget. |
Originally Posted by Professor
(Post 1900283)
I don't know anything but even talking about 195's as replacement aircraft is kind of silly. This management team is smarter than to eject 50-60 seats that are current filled to the brim on most routes.
Down gauging the 88's would be colossally stupid. I doubt that is a long range plan. The 319/20 is a legit replacement. Oh, and I am still waiting on how you think our JV change to block hours is a good thing. |
Originally Posted by pilotc90a
(Post 1900435)
Its just as silly to replace DC-10's with 757's, and 747's with A330's and 757's with 737-900's... what did Delta replace their L1011's with?
Oh, and I am still waiting on how you think our JV change to block hours is a good thing. I'll get you facts and not my opinion on it when it is concluded. Sorry for the delay. |
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1900420)
That was the change being referred to.
o Remove stock volatility from profit sharing calculation by removing gains/losses on equity securities |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1900427)
Certainly not an emotional response like sending in DPA cards. good grief. But I am sure that has a lot of people quaking in their boots.:rolleyes:
Let the process work (hopefully) If we don't get the product we think we should have then reps need to be recalled and all that stuff. I think it would be an enormous mistake to go independent. For example: You think dpa could deliver a scope clause like swa? Seriously? (I don't think they are going to be able to keep the one they have either btw) You and I better get our resumes dusted off if dpa were successful though, and at least you better get used to the idea of being in a mad dog right seat.. Or C2K + inflation? On day 1? rotflmao. All puff and no substance is what it is. jmho, ymmv You need further clarification on language and you are keeping an open mind. I don't. How is my response emotional. It has been proven to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that what we have in place is broken. Until this TA, I agreed with the assessment that Jerry was over the top. I no longer agree with that. Jerry was right. He may have gotten a few details wrong, but he was right more than he was wrong. You may be okay being a frog in a boiling pot of water...that is your emotional response. My response is from years of proof, yet you characterize it as emotional. If I should get used to being in the right seat of a maddog, you should too. |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1900429)
The PTIX proposed changes also call for including executives in the employee pay pool. That dilutes our share of the PS pie significantly.
You won't see a slide or a talking point from Shinner with that nugget. |
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1900443)
T,
You need further clarification on language and you are keeping an open mind. I don't. How is my response emotional. It has been proven to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that what we have in place is broken. Until this TA, I agreed with the assessment that Jerry was over the top. I no longer agree with that. Jerry was right. He may have gotten a few details wrong, but he was right more than he was wrong. You may be okay being a frog in a boiling pot of water...that is your emotional response. My response is from years of proof, yet you characterize it as emotional. If I should get used to being in the right seat of a maddog, you should too. I don't dispute any of that. Except that the dpa is not the answer; to anything. Let's agree to disagree, 'kay? Pm coming at ya. |
Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez
(Post 1900446)
I don't dispute any of that. Except that the dpa is not the answer; to anything. Let's agree to disagree, 'kay?
Pm coming at ya. |
The whole presentation slides yesterday I believe are under library when you login to Delta Alpa
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands