Details on Delta TA
#2211
Can anyone explain how a magazine article has anything to do with contract negotiations? Let's just assume that the article is 100% correct, what in the hell difference does it make? Does anyone think someone will actually sit down at a negotiating table and quote this article as some definitive source?
Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not. There is not one media article that will affect the outcome in any way.
Bottom line; who cares what a stupid magazine says? If it doesn't affect your goals it doesn't affect anyone else's either. If you want to be taken seriously then act serious. This whole argument is fluff.
Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not. There is not one media article that will affect the outcome in any way.
Bottom line; who cares what a stupid magazine says? If it doesn't affect your goals it doesn't affect anyone else's either. If you want to be taken seriously then act serious. This whole argument is fluff.
#2212
Typical attack from the far left. Boring.
Really poor attempt at redefinition to discredit. None of us characterize every one we disagree with this way. Not even close. It's only a handful here that are clearly driven to minimize pilot costs to Delta. You are one. Embrace who you are Oberon.
We've been doing nothing but supporting our arguments Oberon. Including posting the exact quotes and our interpretations thereof. You continually respond by saying you don't understand, and wish for someone to explain it to you...when it's already been done to death. We support, but you pretend not to understand. It's the only tactic left in your quest to defend what you've been told to defend.
We are absolutely up to our eyeballs in Ford and Harrison tactics here Oberon. You're behaving exactly as prescribed to ensure the minimization of pilot costs. If you don't like the characterization, stop the behavior.
You're only showing incapability of "hearing" it. You're method of argument now is to pretend nobody is being clear enough to you. Interesting tactic. Good luck with that.
Carl
Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened.
We've been doing nothing but supporting our arguments Oberon. Including posting the exact quotes and our interpretations thereof. You continually respond by saying you don't understand, and wish for someone to explain it to you...when it's already been done to death. We support, but you pretend not to understand. It's the only tactic left in your quest to defend what you've been told to defend.
You're only showing incapability of "hearing" it. You're method of argument now is to pretend nobody is being clear enough to you. Interesting tactic. Good luck with that.
Carl
Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened.
#2213
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves
#2214
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Likes: 0
#2217
No one has illustrated why they are upset with what Moak was actually quoted as saying. The author of the article says Moak was in town to tell Wall Street not to worry about the pilots. What's he supposed to say, "we're hoping we can bankrupt our companies"?
#2218
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
From: DAL FO
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves

My input on sick leave was explicit: "It ain't broke. Don't fix it!"
#2219
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)
Talk among yourselves
The negotiating environment is slanted significantly more in our favor this time. RA is a pretty smart guy; I don't see how he could look at the situation and think the same rate increases would get a quick deal.
#2220
When did the current sick system go into affect? Aside from the sick verification do people like the new system better? It seems like we are pretty well covered for any extended illness under the current system; could you get paid out when you retired under the old system?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



