![]() |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1733900)
Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not.
What's with all the informational picketing we do? http://cbsnews1.cbsistatic.com/hub/i...ge1329955x.jpg http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7...5b3c5f6f_b.jpg http://r2.aviationpros.com/files/cyg...0_10438102.jpg I think you forgot to clear that post with your bosses alfa. The inflatable rat is not about data. Public relations has an effect on customers, Wall Street, the stock price, etc. etc. That gets management's attention. I think you were probably just being argumentative. But if you really believe what you typed then you need to look up from your charts and bar graphs and get a clue. Lee Moak hurt us with his comments. His whole philosophy of labor relations is a disaster. The sooner we see the back of him the better off we will be. Then we can set about the task of getting his minions off the MEC. |
Alpha, without "Labor Risk", what leverage do we have?
Seriously, why would they pay us anything at all, unless we threatened to walk off the job? So where do you draw the line? What is Reasonable? Was a 42% pay cut Reasonable? And if it was, and if it was necessary to "Save Delta" from liquidation (as you and several others told me at the time), then now that we are making BILLIONS for Richard, isn't it time for us to be repaid? Who gets to decide what we make? YOU? Obama? Or some twit on the NMB? |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1733900)
Can anyone explain how a magazine article has anything to do with contract negotiations? Let's just assume that the article is 100% correct, what in the hell difference does it make? Does anyone think someone will actually sit down at a negotiating table and quote this article as some definitive source?
Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not. There is not one media article that will affect the outcome in any way. Bottom line; who cares what a stupid magazine says? If it doesn't affect your goals it doesn't affect anyone else's either. If you want to be taken seriously then act serious. This whole argument is fluff. We all know they cannot spell "RESTORATION"! So what are the goals? |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
Typical attack from the far left. Boring.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
Really poor attempt at redefinition to discredit. None of us characterize every one we disagree with this way. Not even close. It's only a handful here that are clearly driven to minimize pilot costs to Delta. You are one. Embrace who you are Oberon.
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
We've been doing nothing but supporting our arguments Oberon. Including posting the exact quotes and our interpretations thereof. You continually respond by saying you don't understand, and wish for someone to explain it to you...when it's already been done to death. We support, but you pretend not to understand. It's the only tactic left in your quest to defend what you've been told to defend.
I have been told nothing. My only interaction with DALPA was at the new hire dinner and an email exchange about the multipurpose bank. My only interaction with management was my new hire Chief Pilot interview. Maybe Ford & Harrison is sending subliminal messages to me?
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
We are absolutely up to our eyeballs in Ford and Harrison tactics here Oberon. You're behaving exactly as prescribed to ensure the minimization of pilot costs. If you don't like the characterization, stop the behavior.
|
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1733917)
Fair enough. Why do we have a union president at all, then?
We have an outgoing union President who totally changed the organization and operating structure of the staff in Herndon. It was refocused solely on support of pilots negotiating wages and defending their contract. He energized the staff and changed the work dynamic in a very positive way. He looked out years into the future to define the threats that would leave you jobless in 10 years, well after Lee and I both retired. He has organized a combined attack on these threats to your job and to all future airline jobs. He has worked through a challenging negotiating environment that ended up with industry average wages rising 30+% during his tenure. He has increased the credibility and reach of ALPA throughout the government and the investment community. He has helped energize the airlines to work together with the union to protect our industry from a bunch of short term sellouts who will flush you down the toilet for one additional dollar. Maybe I will add the FAR 117 process that was threatened to be hijacked by some who only care about money and not safety. Let's not forget the minimum pilot requirements for an airline job, another process that was primed to get hijacked by dollar signs and not safety. And for both, I am talking about what really happened not some stupid fairy tale concocted by the DPA crowd and their ilk. Both of these were incredibly complex, detailed negotiations that brought together a variety of players, many of whom have no interest in aviation safety. I will just forget that before he became ALPA President he completely changed the paradigm of mergers and their effects on pilots. A change that is paying dividends to this day. So yeah, he really didn't accomplish anything because some dolt wrote a stupid magazine article, that made no sense at all, and now the webboard crowd has yet one other side issue to carp about. I am sorry, but he has changed this union more in the last 4 years than it has in the other 22 I have been a member. If serious people can't recognize that then heaven help us. We will be relegated to the blowhard, do nothing crowd that the Heidi people represent. At some point, you have to make a choice; do you want someone to hold your hand, pat your head and tell you how bad your life is or do you want someone to actually make your life better. Those are the stark choices we face today. Rhetoric over results or results over rhetoric. Just one more time for emphasis: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Compounded.JPG |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1733960)
Alpha, without "Labor Risk", what leverage do we have?
Seriously, why would they pay us anything at all, unless we threatened to walk off the job? Serious question. I don't recall seeing that anywhere. |
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733968)
Who said we can't threaten to strike? Or strike for that matter?
Serious question. I don't recall seeing that anywhere. Stand by and listen to your Reps, you'll hear all about how AA was 'parked' by the NMB because they asked for too much, and we can't do jack diddley when it comes to a job action, etc...:rolleyes: The real question should be, why do we ALLOW the NMB to dictate to US, what THEY think is "Reasonable"? Why isn't ALPA National attacking the Railway Labor Act? |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened. :(
|
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1733967)
That number should be 100%! We should have been Fully Restored by now! :rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1733959)
So you think family awareness and pilot to pilot and DPN and PUB events and all that stuff are just a waste of time?
What's with all the informational picketing we do? http://farm9.staticflickr.com/8143/7...5b3c5f6f_b.jpg http://r2.aviationpros.com/files/cyg...0_10438102.jpg I think you forgot to clear that post with your bosses alfa. The inflatable rat is not about data. Public relations has an effect on customers, Wall Street, the stock price, etc. etc. That gets management's attention. I think you were probably just being argumentative. But if you really believe what you typed then you need to look up from your charts and bar graphs and get a clue. Lee Moak hurt us with his comments. His whole philosophy of labor relations is a disaster. The sooner we see the back of him the better off we will be. Then we can set about the task of getting his minions off the MEC. That magazine article was not worth a warm bucket of spit and if you can't realize that then your negotiations strategy is equally worthless. I am sorry but the results of the people who think like you have been disastrous. And yet you cling to those tactics like some football coach trying to run a single wing offense. It is absolutely incredible that people like you can't seem to change. Numbers don't lie: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Compounded.JPG |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands