![]() |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1733900)
Can anyone explain how a magazine article has anything to do with contract negotiations? Let's just assume that the article is 100% correct, what in the hell difference does it make? Does anyone think someone will actually sit down at a negotiating table and quote this article as some definitive source?
Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not. There is not one media article that will affect the outcome in any way. Bottom line; who cares what a stupid magazine says? If it doesn't affect your goals it doesn't affect anyone else's either. If you want to be taken seriously then act serious. This whole argument is fluff. |
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733878)
What you and Carl are doing is pure McCarthyism and isn't even veiled.
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733878)
Every time someone disagrees with you they become "DALPA operatives" or more recently company paid spies.
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733878)
It's lazy. You don't bother to support your argument
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733878)
you simply attack with the most powerful accusation this side of "scab".
Originally Posted by Oberon
(Post 1733878)
Argue your point. I'm interested to hear it.
Carl Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened. :( |
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows) He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012 He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey) Talk among yourselves |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1733906)
By this logic, Lee could go to all the media outlets and say we're overpaid and deserve paycuts without any effect on us. Do you agree that he could do that?
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1733907)
Carl Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened. :( |
Originally Posted by alfaromeo
(Post 1733914)
Yes I agree. There are no words that could make you want less. All the rest is webboard fluff.
|
Originally Posted by Scoop
(Post 1733894)
Oberon,
Do you think Moak's statement will benefit us, benefit management, or basically have no effect? I don't think it will be a big deal, but I tell you what - it will not help us no matter how you look at it. My opinion is that Lee got a little carried away. Scoop No one has illustrated why they are upset with what Moak was actually quoted as saying. The author of the article says Moak was in town to tell Wall Street not to worry about the pilots. What's he supposed to say, "we're hoping we can bankrupt our companies"? |
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 1733911)
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows) He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012 He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey) Talk among yourselves My input on sick leave was explicit: "It ain't broke. Don't fix it!" |
Originally Posted by DALMD88FO
(Post 1733911)
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.
RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows) He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012 He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey) Talk among yourselves The negotiating environment is slanted significantly more in our favor this time. RA is a pretty smart guy; I don't see how he could look at the situation and think the same rate increases would get a quick deal. |
Originally Posted by LeineLodge
(Post 1733927)
Who knows? Definitely sounds like a rumor :D
My input on sick leave was explicit: "It ain't broke. Don't fix it!" |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands