Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Details on Delta TA (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/88532-details-delta-ta.html)

80ktsClamp 09-24-2014 06:20 PM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1733900)
Can anyone explain how a magazine article has anything to do with contract negotiations? Let's just assume that the article is 100% correct, what in the hell difference does it make? Does anyone think someone will actually sit down at a negotiating table and quote this article as some definitive source?

Just to be clear, negotiations are about money and data. You guys argue on webboards and think that negotiations are some PR contest. They are not. There is not one media article that will affect the outcome in any way.

Bottom line; who cares what a stupid magazine says? If it doesn't affect your goals it doesn't affect anyone else's either. If you want to be taken seriously then act serious. This whole argument is fluff.

By this logic, Lee could go to all the media outlets and say we're overpaid and deserve paycuts without any effect on us. Do you agree that he could do that?

Carl Spackler 09-24-2014 06:28 PM


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1733878)
What you and Carl are doing is pure McCarthyism and isn't even veiled.

Typical attack from the far left. Boring.


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1733878)
Every time someone disagrees with you they become "DALPA operatives" or more recently company paid spies.

Really poor attempt at redefinition to discredit. None of us characterize every one we disagree with this way. Not even close. It's only a handful here that are clearly driven to minimize pilot costs to Delta. You are one. Embrace who you are Oberon.


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1733878)
It's lazy. You don't bother to support your argument

We've been doing nothing but supporting our arguments Oberon. Including posting the exact quotes and our interpretations thereof. You continually respond by saying you don't understand, and wish for someone to explain it to you...when it's already been done to death. We support, but you pretend not to understand. It's the only tactic left in your quest to defend what you've been told to defend.


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1733878)
you simply attack with the most powerful accusation this side of "scab".

We are absolutely up to our eyeballs in Ford and Harrison tactics here Oberon. You're behaving exactly as prescribed to ensure the minimization of pilot costs. If you don't like the characterization, stop the behavior.


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 1733878)
Argue your point. I'm interested to hear it.

You're only showing incapability of "hearing" it. You're method of argument now is to pretend nobody is being clear enough to you. Interesting tactic. Good luck with that.

Carl

Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened. :(

DALMD88FO 09-24-2014 06:32 PM

Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.

RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)

Talk among yourselves

alfaromeo 09-24-2014 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1733906)
By this logic, Lee could go to all the media outlets and say we're overpaid and deserve paycuts without any effect on us. Do you agree that he could do that?

Yes I agree. There are no words that could make you want less. All the rest is webboard fluff.

80ktsClamp 09-24-2014 06:34 PM


Originally Posted by Carl Spackler (Post 1733907)

Carl

Dang it, 10,000 posts. I can't believe it happened. :(

http://retrocomputacion.com/yabbfile...0000_posts.jpg

80ktsClamp 09-24-2014 06:35 PM


Originally Posted by alfaromeo (Post 1733914)
Yes I agree. There are no words that could make you want less. All the rest is webboard fluff.

Fair enough. Why do we have a union president at all, then?

Oberon 09-24-2014 07:00 PM


Originally Posted by Scoop (Post 1733894)
Oberon,

Do you think Moak's statement will benefit us, benefit management, or basically have no effect?

I don't think it will be a big deal, but I tell you what - it will not help us no matter how you look at it. My opinion is that Lee got a little carried away.

Scoop

I assume you are referring to the article? He said basically nothing. I don't think it has any effect other than to provide ammunition for those who dislike Moak or ALPA in general.

No one has illustrated why they are upset with what Moak was actually quoted as saying. The author of the article says Moak was in town to tell Wall Street not to worry about the pilots. What's he supposed to say, "we're hoping we can bankrupt our companies"?

LeineLodge 09-24-2014 07:05 PM


Originally Posted by DALMD88FO (Post 1733911)
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.

RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)

Talk among yourselves

Who knows? Definitely sounds like a rumor :D

My input on sick leave was explicit: "It ain't broke. Don't fix it!"

Oberon 09-24-2014 07:08 PM


Originally Posted by DALMD88FO (Post 1733911)
Talked to a friend today, yes this guy actually exists, and he heard this rumor about the upcoming contract negotiations.

RA wants a quick deal again (no surprise there, wall street likes things wrapped up in little bows)
He expects about the same pay increases as in C2012
He wants to revamp the sick leave policy (apparently too many people are using the 100 hours now and would explain the questions in the survey)

Talk among yourselves

Is your friend someone who knows something or is this speculation?

The negotiating environment is slanted significantly more in our favor this time. RA is a pretty smart guy; I don't see how he could look at the situation and think the same rate increases would get a quick deal.

Oberon 09-24-2014 07:13 PM


Originally Posted by LeineLodge (Post 1733927)
Who knows? Definitely sounds like a rumor :D

My input on sick leave was explicit: "It ain't broke. Don't fix it!"

When did the current sick system go into affect? Aside from the sick verification do people like the new system better? It seems like we are pretty well covered for any extended illness under the current system; could you get paid out when you retired under the old system?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:34 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands