|
If this is the best TA we can get I think the negotiating committee needs to go back to flying the line. Donatelli should probably head back also because he is over his head as the chairman. Whoever is erasing messages on Facebook should be fired immediately. This is 100% unsat
|
[QUOTE=Professor;1900731]I could be. But I am not.
I am very happy to stop answering questions.[/QUOTE If the union hadn't pulled down the old forum, that would be the place to answer questions. This smells of desperation. The TA is subpar, plain and simple. By all means, keep answering. |
Hank, if I were in your position I would not disagree.
That is exactly what it looks like. I don't have all the details as to why, but there should be a statement soon. Really. But again, please keep discussing here and elsewhere the merits and de-merits of the proposed TA. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Hank Kingsley
(Post 1900727)
You're claiming to represent my union, how do we know who you are? You could be anyone. Spreading inaccurate information. This stinks. I think it's borderline unethical. What do the alpa lawyers say?
|
Originally Posted by Sounds
(Post 1900732)
C'mon, you know damn well you wouldn't (and shouldn't) post personal information like that online. If you don't believe him, use critical thinking to parse through the information he gives. You should be doing that with everyone anyway...
|
Originally Posted by TheManager
(Post 1900716)
Bumping it for you Prof.
Are you going to keep dodging the question? Professor. Answer this. Did the NC achieve the same band for the A330 at Delta as AMR did for the A330 they have? ***AMR 777/a330/767-4- all in the same band.*** |
Originally Posted by Sounds
(Post 1900723)
This is what I don't want. With the NMB elections coming up they have already said they wouldn't get to us till 2018. Sorry bro, that FUD won't fly here. The company's operation will unravel far sooner with the retirements coming up, and Wall Street will **** themselves when they realize labor risk is on the table. Our "me too" clause will kick in. The company desperately needs a permanent fix to the AF/KLM violation. The arbitrator would not be pleased if the company pretty much plans on eternally ignoring our contract. That generates further leverage. |
When will the vote be out?
|
Originally Posted by MOTOJOE
(Post 1900742)
When will the vote be out?
I'll be surprised if there is a vote today. |
Originally Posted by civmilciv
(Post 1900705)
I'd like to hear more about the JV language changes, EASKs vs block hours etc. and what it means for Delta widebody flying. It sounds horrible to me at first glance but I readily admit that I might be missing something. I hope I am. So, is this being discussed there today and if so what's the deal?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Typing on a tiny phone but here's 3 numbers: DAL Block hours- Right now- 51.5% What it SHOULD have been to comply with the JV- 53.1% What the new TA allows- 49% Edit: that's aircraft block hours not pilot block hours |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands