Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 09-25-2014 | 10:15 AM
  #2331  
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 7,263
Likes: 105
From: DAL 330
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
First of all the reserve concessions we gave up were very significant for both long call and all day one assignments for both reserve QOL and manning. We paid a steep price in work rules we'll never get back for that ADG.

Second, I don't say very much if anything about Moak, other than criticizing him for his obviously fake "I have no intention to run for office at this time" 10 minutes before he ran, and his potential offering up of the DAL pilot seniority list in any possible merger with a young/start up/low longevity airline to estoll the virtues of universal ALPA membership. As well as him signing the unprecidented Pinnacle agreement and secret "vault letter" nonsense that for the first time gave another pilot group the legal ability to negotiate with DL management to "own" DL flying. That is entirely unacceptable.

Other than that, I'm not "anti-Moak" (5 figure oil paintings notwithstanding) critic nor have I advocated the other potential union. I actually think he does a fairly good job on "the hill" with many issues, which is a good thing. And his hair always looks fantastic. Besides he's going away anyway soon regardless. Nor have I condemned the other potential union, though they have their issues as well to be sure. I'm very much in favor of change within up until the moment we actually, legally have another union, if ever, and do not have a card in for the other guys either. Yet.

I have concerns with ALPA, as I would have concerns with any union. But ALPA is what we have.

The ADG increase was a gain for sure. We paid a lot for it though.

5 more weeks to go I guess.
Gloopy,

Can you please expand on what we paid for it? I have to agree with Herkflyr - the 5+15 ADG will be huge - it does not seem to me that we paid a lot - maybe I am missing something.

Thanks

Scoop
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 10:27 AM
  #2332  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

deleted. I have better things to do than argue with a fool.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 10:39 AM
  #2333  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by index
RA "only got" $652,083 in salary during that same timeframe (2012). I don't know how he got by. Sounds kinda meager, huh. Until you consider his TOTAL COMPENSATION which included $2.7m in CASH (not salary, but money nonetheless), $7m in stock, plus another $2m in stock options. Total package almost $12.6m, up a staggering 42% from the year prior where he "only made" $8.9m.
Heresy!

Everybody knows nobody could EVER get a 42% RAISE, in one fell swoop!!

Just ask anyone at Dalpa!

Richard's getting paid, no doubt, remind me again, how much was his pay cut in 2004 to Save Delta?

And does he still have a retirement plan??
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 11:05 AM
  #2334  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
His salary from ALPA was around $347K. The rest of the $1.3M was housing, transportation, and other expense reimbursements.
That's just not correct Alan. $347K was base compensation. $158K was deferred compensation subtotaling $505K. $30K in tax free benefits gives us a subtotal of $535K which is all money in his pocket.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
They were huge to be sure, but they did not take the form of money in his pocket at the end of the day.
Incorrect again. After his direct compensation of $535K, there was "other compensation" totaling $742K. The IRS considers it ALL to be taxable compensation because it is actually money in his pocket. Mr. Moak CHOSE to keep DC as his secondary residence. That means he's CHOSEN to be a commuter. But unlike the rest of us, Moak gets fully reimbursed for his second residence, cars and meals. Since Moak is so reimbursed, the IRS correctly considers it ALL taxable compensation. Furthermore, Moak is not under a plan whereby he only gets reimbursed for actual receipted costs. He gets a block grant of money to handle what ALPA thinks a second residence, cars and food will cost.

Don't mean to return your stubbornness with more stubbornness Alan, but no accountant and no IRS person would agree with the case you're trying to make. Lee's compensation was just under 1.3 million dollars. Exactly as Index said.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 11:15 AM
  #2335  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
It's not a new tactic, my brother.
Yes it is brother Alan. You're the first to assert (2.5 years after the fact) that "cost neutral" was never uttered.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
You continue to assert that those words were used, and have drug out several quotes that do not use those words.
I have never drug out a quote that did not use those words. I've only posted the actual quotes and the links to where those quotes came from over 2 years ago. You're now attempting to say it never happened because I won't oblige you by finding those old posts. Knock yourself out if you think you're helping your cause. Reality is that too many people remember it and you're only damaging your credibility.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Now that each of those have been debunked, you suddenly decide that it must have been in an article that was published 2.5 years ago, but that no one can find anymore. That's new.
See above. Your new tactic hasn't debunked anything. You can't erase history by baiting others to dig up the old articles.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Regarding waiting 2.5 years, I only joined this board late last year, and have only heard about this article today. Sorry if I missed it's posting previously.
You've been baiting me and others to prove it to you by finding the articles for weeks now. It won't work Alan, but I know you'll press on. In fact, I'm counting on it.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 11:19 AM
  #2336  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Carl, how do you explain the quarterly and annual reports showing pilot costs increasing at a higher rate the DALPA even predicted in the road shows.
If they supported your statements you would long ago posted them.

Here we go again for at least the tenth time. The quarterly and annual reports do not show Pilot COSTS. They show WAGES AND SALARIES. Do you know the difference? If so, please explain the difference between pilot wages/salaries and pilot costs.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 11:31 AM
  #2337  
finis72's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: 777 Sim Instructor
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Here we go again for at least the tenth time. The quarterly and annual reports do not show Pilot COSTS. They show WAGES AND SALARIES. Do you know the difference? If so, please explain the difference between pilot wages/salaries and pilot costs.

Carl
Wages and salaries make up around 70% of the total cost for most companies in private industry, the remaining 30% of the cost of an employee group is in insurance etc.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 12:39 PM
  #2338  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,877
Likes: 194
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Here we go again for at least the tenth time. The quarterly and annual reports do not show Pilot COSTS. They show WAGES AND SALARIES. Do you know the difference? If so, please explain the difference between pilot wages/salaries and pilot costs.

Carl
Ok Carl, humor me a bit after all I am a bit slow. You call me names all the time so I know you understand that.
Wages and salaries are up. Retirement expenses are up even more with the 1% increase and funding needs for the NWA plan. Productivity is about the same as verified by block hours per pilot and total system hours verses pilots hired.
So where is this almost half a billion dollars per year they are saving with contract 2012? What is it and where can I find it in the reports?
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 12:41 PM
  #2339  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by finis72
One of the things I liked about our contract was the flexibility it offered, if I wanted more pay I could use the system to fly more, or, I could use the system to fly as little as possible.
The so called "flexibility" to earn more money through flying more hours is precisely managements concept of a "pay raise" they have always wanted us to buy into. The correct answer, more pay with more time with your family at home. Btw, getting time off is near impossible (flying as little as possible is a pipe dream for most catagories) and will probably continue this way due to the way the company staffs reserves now. This needs to change.

Originally Posted by finis72
Another point is that the company has a limit to what they are going to pay in C2015, the pie is only so big before the Company says NO. That is an economic reality so the question is how to divide the pie.
Ford and Harrison called. They want their playbook back. Oh wait, it's on loan to DALPA through C2015. Nevermind.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:04 PM
  #2340  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You're the first to assert that "cost neutral" was never uttered.
Hardly....
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices