Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 09-25-2014 | 01:11 PM
  #2341  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
After his direct compensation of $535K, there was "other compensation" totaling $742K. The IRS considers it ALL to be taxable compensation because it is actually money in his pocket. Mr. Moak CHOSE to keep DC as his secondary residence. That means he's CHOSEN to be a commuter. But unlike the rest of us, Moak gets fully reimbursed for his second residence, cars and meals. Since Moak is so reimbursed, the IRS correctly considers it ALL taxable compensation. Furthermore, Moak is not under a plan whereby he only gets reimbursed for actual receipted costs. He gets a block grant of money to handle what ALPA thinks a second residence, cars and food will cost.
As I understand it, ALPA reimburses any pilot who does not live in the location at which he is working for the cost of his accommodations. This ranges anywhere from a hotel room at an MEC meeting, to the apartment in ATL in which the MEC Chairman stays when he is in the office, to the apartment in DC in which the ALPA President stays while he is at work.

Some amount of this is considered taxable income by the IRS, although I have no idea how much. That's not the same thing as saying that it's spendable income, any more than the hotel, transportation, and per diem that Delta provides us on a layover or while in training.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:18 PM
  #2342  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by index
I never mentioned anything about salary, Alan. You did, in your obvious attempt to add your spin. I said Moak's 2012 compensation was close to $1.3m.
No spin intended, other than to clarify that taxable compensation in the eyes of the IRS and spendable income are two entirely different things.

Originally Posted by index
That's hysterical Alan. Yeah, probably a very close call. Comparing compensation packages between Moak and the average line pilot are just oh so close.
Not particularly close, unless you are in one of the highest paying categories at one of the highest paying ALPA carriers. In that event, your spendable income can certainly rival that of the ALPA President's, provided you are willing to be contactable 24/7 and work (fly, in this case) whenever and wherever the GSs take you.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:28 PM
  #2343  
index's Avatar
Wind the clock beoch
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
No spin intended, other than to clarify that taxable compensation in the eyes of the IRS and spendable income are two entirely different things.
Duh. Thanks for that lesson. But I've never questioned that. What I DID say was that The Donald made nearly $1.3m in 2012 (I was off by $22k). That's his TOTAL COMPENSATION. I never claimed it was his salary. You brought that up to muddy the water. And you failed.

Please Alan. Take a seat. Your going to pass out from spinning so much.

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Not particularly close, unless you are in one of the highest paying categories at one of the highest paying ALPA carriers. In that event, your spendable income can certainly rival that of the ALPA President's, provided you are willing to be contactable 24/7 and work (fly, in this case) whenever and wherever the GSs take you.
More B.S. Alan. If your employer pays for your car, your home, your utilities, your travel, your meals, etc...guess what? You have a HELL of a LOT of spendable income. The line pilot gets no such deal. Try again.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:33 PM
  #2344  
Purple Drank's Avatar
Straight QOL, homie
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,202
Likes: 1
From: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Default

Alan. Your ham-handed obfuscation is making you look silly. Index is crushing your spin. Please cease the disingenuous nonsense.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:38 PM
  #2345  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
The (previous) language plus 117 meant you had to have 10 hours rest after you manually acknowledged in icrew/phone. That, coupled with the 9 hours prior language, meant either 19 hours or, if strictly interpreted, unlimited un-usability. That may or may not have been overturned in a grievance, but the 9+10 was a very safe bet because the language there was very clear.

I was actually thinking we'd split the difference and settle for 16 or so. But instead we settled for 13. Then have the extra hour up and went back to 12. With voicemail notification. The last truly big "hammer" we may ever have is now gone.
That was disappointing to see. But there was never any specific language regarding 9 hours in the contract -- there was only 12 hours of notification and 3 hours prior to report for acknowledgement. I agree that the difference of 9 hours should have given us plenty of leverage, but apparently the MEC and NC didn't see it that way.

Your voicemail issue still confuses me, though. I don't see the difference between where we were last year and where we are now. In both cases, the long call has at least 12 hours from first attempted notification to report for a trip (and now short call, too).

How is it different?

Originally Posted by gloopy
Another huge concession was day one going from noon to 10am. Noon was the company's best case unilateral fatasy they felt they could even maybe stand a chance with in arbitration under the old language. They knew they stood no chance for anything earlier. Yet we willingly gave them 10am, which is the FAR bare bones minimum now.
I'm not sure why we did that, either.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:43 PM
  #2346  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by index
If your employer pays for your car, your home, your utilities, your travel, your meals, etc...guess what? You have a HELL of a LOT of spendable income. The line pilot gets no such deal. Try again.
Now I'm confused. Should I sit down before I pass out from spinning, or should I try again?

I think I'll try again.

As a line pilot, I get transportation, hotel (including utilities), per diem, free passports and visas, etc. Should I consider all of that spendable income?
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:43 PM
  #2347  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Purple Drank
Please cease the disingenuous nonsense.
I replied to Index before I read your post. So sorry...
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:50 PM
  #2348  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
You want to talk about complete BS, then why, even if it were just a software issue that took time, was there no back pay provision once the programming was completed?

They got their end immediately, and we got the biggest part of our limited upside delayed (because of software lol yeah right) with zero back pay.
Again, it's my understanding that the trade was 5:15 ADG for the new duty day limits. Both go into effect at the same time -- November 1.

They got a usable reserve system back, and we got back what we had before -- the ability for a long call pilot to turn his phone off for any length of time up to 12 hours, so long as he would then be in a position to report 12 hours after he turned the phone off.

The latter is what I see both sides having gotten out of the reserve piece.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 01:57 PM
  #2349  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 922
Likes: 0
From: Decoupled
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
I definitely preferred our system. I had over 2,200 hours of sick time banked and never once flew when sick. I considered it my primary long term disability benefit.

Carl
My question for you is how long did it take you to build such robust bank (2,200 hours)? If we started this right now, are they going to place a lump sum in an account for the over 50 age group pilots? Or, are we starting with 60 hours?

Second point, if we go into bankruptcy again, is there anything to stop the Company from cancelling your 2,200 hour bank? My guess is the judge will sign that little account away in a heartbeat.

Because of this, I think that you are wrong about using your sick leave as short term or long term disability plan. DALPA spent a considerable amount of negotiating capital in the bankruptcy process to protect and secure the D&S plan from corporate raiding.

I just don't think sick leave banks are protected in bankruptcy. Now someone reading this might say, we won't go into bankruptcy, we're making record profits. Where have I heard that one before?

I think the current system is not perfect but it's a lot better than it was previously. I learned something from this discussion. I won't voluntarily bid reserve in April and May. Everyone seems to be calling in sick to use up their 100 hours.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:06 PM
  #2350  
Hillbilly's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 972
Likes: 1
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Wow. You actually took the time to sit down with a calculator and derive that?



Carl

Nah. I did it in my head.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices