Details on Delta TA
06-10-2015 | 02:06 PM
#7341
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,613
Likes: 627
I saw several slides on the RJ scope, but nothing addressing the widebody concessions. This oversight by our "Strategic Planning" committee is significant cause for concern. How could a "Strategic Planning" committee overlook a reduction in top end scope? Why was there no mention of years of willful violation of the JV contract by the company? Shouldn't this enter the perspective of the NMB? Was this a really a scare tactic in disguise? (TIC)
06-10-2015 | 02:08 PM
#7344
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
I'm sure this was their opener, well, no I'm not. We might have made additional concessions from what they asked for to get 8633.
06-10-2015 | 02:10 PM
#7346
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
I saw several slides on the RJ scope, but nothing addressing the widebody concessions. This oversight by our "Strategic Planning" committee is significant cause for concern. How could a "Strategic Planning" committee overlook a reduction in top end scope? Why was there no mention of years of willful violation of the JV contract by the company? Shouldn't this enter the perspective of the NMB? Was this a really a scare tactic in disguise? (TIC)
I don't think it is. But...
I think that's a decision for the membership to make on their own.
I think the clarification is still being crafted.
Again, I apologize for the delay and gaps in communication at times.
But the JV is a big concern to me as well.
06-10-2015 | 02:11 PM
#7347
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
I saw several slides on the RJ scope, but nothing addressing the widebody concessions. This oversight by our "Strategic Planning" committee is significant cause for concern. How could a "Strategic Planning" committee overlook a reduction in top end scope? Why was there no mention of years of willful violation of the JV contract by the company? Shouldn't this enter the perspective of the NMB? Was this a really a scare tactic in disguise? (TIC)
It'll be interesting to hear from council 1 and 20.
06-10-2015 | 02:12 PM
#7348
veut gagner à la loterie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Professor, thanks for live... foruming. .. this.
06-10-2015 | 02:12 PM
#7349
Racketeer
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,327
Likes: 817
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
RJ scope is maxed with the 717 deal. If they really want them add them to mainline and make them common with the E195. They will always look for relief and we have always giving it. The line is drawn, don't redraw it again. The large end scope was probably rewritten in the grievance settlement but I haven't seen those details yet either. Being separate and all they should be available. But...
06-10-2015 | 02:13 PM
#7350
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 618
Likes: 0
The truth is that the LEC reps are the experts. They have been living with the language. But as you know are quite busy.
P2P got it when the membership did and are really trying to fill the gaps as best we can.
Again, it isn't ideal. But for those of you who have been patient and are asking questions. Thank you very much.
P2P got it when the membership did and are really trying to fill the gaps as best we can.
Again, it isn't ideal. But for those of you who have been patient and are asking questions. Thank you very much.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
