Notices

Details on Delta TA

Old 09-25-2014 | 02:16 PM
  #2351  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
But if you're going to include the value of Lee's DC housing, transportation, etc., wouldn't you then need to include the value of our housing while on the road (hotels), transportation (hotel vans), and per diem in our total compensation package?
No Alan and here's why. Pilots travel in the course of their actual work. Most times that work travel requires a hotel away from base. That is rightly paid for by the company and rightly recognized by the IRS as not being income. An office worker (Moak) does not travel away from base when said office worker is at the office. Thus no hotel or housing is required because...it's his base. Now if your company (ALPA) provides it for you anyway, it's considered residential housing at your base. This allows you to keep more of your other money that others have to use for their housing, thus the IRS rightly recognizes this as income. Same with meals, same with cars.

Since you're really struggling with an analogy as the one you're trying to use is collapsing around you, allow me to throw you a lifeline. The correct analogy would be Delta paying for the housing, car and meals of a commuting pilot before and after the trip. If Delta did that, the IRS would rightly consider that income. Why? Because paying for commuting expenses allows you to keep more of your salary.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:30 PM
  #2352  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Herkflyr
"Limited" upside? Are you kidding me? Tbe ADG (applicable to reserves and dh-only duty periods, both firsts in the history of our airline) is probably one of the best two or three contractual improvements EVER, and guys like you are just "meh."

Unbelievable. I don't care if it took a few months to program the company computers. All changes have an implementation schedule, including changes in the company's favor.

(Ask an old guy about getting rid of partial month moveups for reserves in C2K; those were a great scheduling deal that we voluntarily negotiated away in C2K; it was a big "win" for the company but it still took a year to get them programmed out of the company computers--see, it goes both ways.)

The ADG is now in our contract forever. Within a year the entire seniority list will be wondering how we ever allowed the pilot group NOT to have it--you know, kind of like how back in the pre-117 and pre-121/Whitlow days you could be on perpetual short call 24/7. It was accepted as "part of the job" back in the good ol' days, but is inconceivable now.

Your groupthink Moak and ALPA hatefest on this thread is leading you to dismiss significant changes. After all, if you actually acknowledge the huge gain the ADG represents, that interferes with the "ALPA sucks" mindset that let's face it, is kind of fun to embrace.
You can't possibly say this yet Herkflyr. None of us has any idea how the company might build rotations to mitigate ADG 5:15. It could be a big deal, and it could be a big nothing. We won't know until after implementation.

Regarding something in our contract being "in our contract forever", you may want to revise that remark. Anything can be removed either voluntarily or by force of a BK judge. More importantly however is that your union can effectively remove it by not defending the language. Would you like a few examples of that?

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:33 PM
  #2353  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Timbo
Heresy!

Everybody knows nobody could EVER get a 42% RAISE, in one fell swoop!!

Just ask anyone at Dalpa!

Richard's getting paid, no doubt, remind me again, how much was his pay cut in 2004 to Save Delta?

And does he still have a retirement plan??
Absolutely right Timbo. Remember the immortal words of tsquare: "Baby steps people...baby steps."

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:51 PM
  #2354  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That is rightly paid for by the company and rightly recognized by the IRS as not being income.
There is nothing "right" about it. It's a standard practice at airlines, just as provided lodging for a pilot doing work at ALPA is a standard practice. Either way, it saves the employee the expense of having to provide it out of pocket.

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
The correct analogy would be Delta paying for the housing, car and meals of a commuting pilot before and after the trip. If Delta did that, the IRS would rightly consider that income. Why? Because paying for commuting expenses allows you to keep more of your salary.
For example, when Delta pays for a pilot's hotel when he is training at his base? Or when NWA used to provide positive space travel for commuting instructors to NATCO and give them hotels during stretches of sim periods?

Was that considered income?
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 02:59 PM
  #2355  
Alan Shore's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by orvil
...if we go into bankruptcy again, is there anything to stop the Company from cancelling your 2,200 hour bank? My guess is the judge will sign that little account away in a heartbeat.
Well, that did not occur at NWA, UAL, or AA in their bankruptcies.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 03:05 PM
  #2356  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Ok Carl, humor me a bit after all I am a bit slow. You call me names all the time so I know you understand that.
Wages and salaries are up. Retirement expenses are up even more with the 1% increase and funding needs for the NWA plan. Productivity is about the same as verified by block hours per pilot and total system hours verses pilots hired.
So where is this almost half a billion dollars per year they are saving with contract 2012? What is it and where can I find it in the reports?
Answering a question by asking more questions doesn't work bud. You know better than that. So here's my post again for you to actually answer:

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Here we go again for at least the tenth time. The quarterly and annual reports do not show Pilot COSTS. They show WAGES AND SALARIES. Do you know the difference? If so, please explain the difference between pilot wages/salaries and pilot costs.
Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 03:12 PM
  #2357  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
You're the first to assert (2.5 years after the fact) that "cost neutral" was never uttered.
Originally Posted by Alan Shore
Hardly....
Actually you are Alan. Nobody before has attempted to say Richard and Ed never said it. Others have tried to explain away what they meant by "cost neutral", but nobody has said it never happened. Only you.

Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 03:17 PM
  #2358  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Shore
As I understand it, ALPA reimburses any pilot who does not live in the location at which he is working for the cost of his accommodations. This ranges anywhere from a hotel room at an MEC meeting, to the apartment in ATL in which the MEC Chairman stays when he is in the office, to the apartment in DC in which the ALPA President stays while he is at work.

Some amount of this is considered taxable income by the IRS, although I have no idea how much. That's not the same thing as saying that it's spendable income, any more than the hotel, transportation, and per diem that Delta provides us on a layover or while in training.
Argue with accounting standards and the IRS all you want. You just look foolish doing so.

Your effort at saving face is valiant Alan, but your structure ain't lookin too good.





Carl
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 03:22 PM
  #2359  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
Absolutely right Timbo. Remember the immortal words of tsquare: "Baby steps people...baby steps."

Carl

That would be ok if I had 30 years to go, but most of us don't have time for Baby Steps. We've had 10 years of baby steps, and we are nowhere near what we had 10 years ago.

We are making BILLIONS PER QUARTER for Delta, it's payback time...NOW, not 10 years from now.

So, to recap:

1. DALPA has no goals, and won't even mention Restoration in our lifetime.

2. Because they have no defined goals, they have no strategy for achieving anything, other than baby steps.

3. According to Alfa, marching in uniform and informational picketing is so old school, it'll never work now because......

4. Labor Risk has been taken off the table

5. Our contracts are mature


OK, any questions?

Just hurry up and sign up for the next 3% COLA contract with the bankruptcy pay rates in force for the rest of our careers.
Reply
Old 09-25-2014 | 03:34 PM
  #2360  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

We'll never get to the 3% raises on C2012 because something else big is coming.

Don't you remember?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
ksatflyer
Hangar Talk
10
08-20-2008 09:14 PM
INAV8OR
Mergers and Acquisitions
66
05-15-2008 04:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices